a Data and Analytics Section, Division of Data, Research and Policy (DRP) , UNICEF , New York , NY , USA.
b International Centre for Reproductive Health , Ghent University , Gent , Belgium.
Glob Public Health. 2019 Aug;14(8):1139-1152. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1571091. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
While Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) has been in existence for centuries, the rigorous and systematic documentation of the extent of the practice is a recent undertaking. This paper discusses data availability related to the practice of FGM and reviews the methods used to generate prevalence estimates. The aim is to illustrate strengths and limitations of the available data. The review is organised around two main categories of countries: FGM countries of origin, where representative prevalence data exist, and countries of migration for women and girls who have undergone FGM, for which representative prevalence data are lacking. This second category also includes countries across the world where FGM is only found among small autochthonous populations.
虽然女性外阴残割(FGM)已经存在了几个世纪,但对该行为的广泛而系统的记录却是最近才开始的。本文讨论了与女性外阴残割实践相关的数据可用性,并回顾了用于生成流行率估计的方法。目的是说明现有数据的优势和局限性。综述围绕着两个主要类别的国家展开:存在代表性流行率数据的女性外阴残割原籍国,以及存在女性外阴残割移民但缺乏代表性流行率数据的女性和女孩移民目的地国。第二类还包括在世界各地只有少量原住民群体存在女性外阴残割的国家。