• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区域和全球作物多样性在人类世的变化。

Regional and global shifts in crop diversity through the Anthropocene.

机构信息

Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences and The Centre for Critical Development Studies, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Canada.

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0209788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209788. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0209788
PMID:30726231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6364885/
Abstract

The Anthropocene epoch is partly defined by anthropogenic spread of crops beyond their centres of origin. At global scales, evidence indicates that species-level taxonomic diversity of crops being cultivated on large-scale agricultural lands has increased linearly over the past 50 years. Yet environmental and socio-economic differences support expectations that temporal changes in crop diversity vary across regions. Ecological theory also suggests that changes in crop taxonomic diversity may not necessarily reflect changes in the evolutionary diversity of crops. We used data from the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations to assess changes in crop taxonomic- and phylogenetic diversity across 22 subcontinental-scale regions from 1961-2014. We document certain broad consistencies across nearly all regions: i) little change in crop diversity from 1961 through to the late 1970s; followed by ii) a 10-year period of sharp diversification through the early 1980s; followed by iii) a "levelling-off" of crop diversification beginning in the early 1990s. However, the specific onset and duration of these distinct periods differs significantly across regions and are unrelated to agricultural expansion, indicating that unique policy or environmental conditions influence the crops being grown within a given region. Additionally, while the 1970s and 1980s are defined by region-scale increases in crop diversity this period marks the increasing dominance of a small number of crop species and lineages; a trend resulting in detectable increases in the similarity of crops being grown across regions. Broad similarities in the species-level taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of crops being grown across regions, primarily at large industrial scales captured by FAO data, represent a unique feature of the Anthropocene epoch. Yet nuanced asymmetries in regional-scale trends suggest that environmental and socio-economic factors play a key role in shaping observed macro-ecological changes in the plant diversity on agricultural lands.

摘要

人类世部分由作物在起源地以外的人为传播来定义。在全球范围内,有证据表明,过去 50 年来,在大规模农业土地上种植的作物的种级分类多样性呈线性增长。然而,环境和社会经济差异表明,不同地区的作物多样性变化存在时间差异。生态理论还表明,作物分类多样性的变化不一定反映作物进化多样性的变化。我们利用联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)的数据,评估了 1961 年至 2014 年 22 个次大陆尺度区域的作物分类和系统发育多样性的变化。我们记录了几乎所有地区都存在的某些广泛一致性:i)从 1961 年到 70 年代末,作物多样性变化不大;其次,ii)在 80 年代初的 10 年时间里,作物多样性急剧多样化;随后,iii)从 90 年代初开始,作物多样化开始“趋平”。然而,这些不同阶段的具体开始时间和持续时间在不同地区差异显著,与农业扩张无关,这表明独特的政策或环境条件影响了特定地区种植的作物。此外,尽管 70 年代和 80 年代以区域范围内作物多样性的增加为特征,但这一时期标志着少数作物物种和谱系的主导地位不断增强;这一趋势导致了跨地区种植作物的相似性增加。在 FAO 数据捕捉的大工业规模上,各地区种植作物的种级分类和系统发育多样性的广泛相似性代表了人类世的一个独特特征。然而,区域尺度趋势的细微差异表明,环境和社会经济因素在塑造农业土地上植物多样性的观测宏观生态变化方面发挥着关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/c09d5a910d13/pone.0209788.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/58cd6f2898cd/pone.0209788.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/99cb1ba69242/pone.0209788.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/c09d5a910d13/pone.0209788.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/58cd6f2898cd/pone.0209788.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/99cb1ba69242/pone.0209788.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5b/6364885/c09d5a910d13/pone.0209788.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Regional and global shifts in crop diversity through the Anthropocene.区域和全球作物多样性在人类世的变化。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0209788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209788. eCollection 2019.
2
National-scale changes in crop diversity through the Anthropocene.人类世背景下的作物多样性的国家尺度变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99728-5.
3
Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator dependence without a parallel increase in crop diversification.全球农业生产力正受到日益增长的传粉媒介依赖的威胁,而作物多样化却没有相应增加。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Oct;25(10):3516-3527. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14736. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Crop Species Diversity Changes in the United States: 1978-2012.美国农作物物种多样性变化:1978 - 2012年
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0136580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136580. eCollection 2015.
5
The scale dependency of spatial crop species diversity and its relation to temporal diversity.空间作物物种多样性的尺度依赖性及其与时间多样性的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 20;117(42):26176-26182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011702117. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
Agricultural intensification was associated with crop diversification in India (1947-2014).农业集约化与印度(1947-2014 年)的作物多样化有关。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 11;14(12):e0225555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225555. eCollection 2019.
7
Larger nations benefit more than smaller nations from the stabilizing effects of crop diversity.从作物多样性的稳定效应来看,大国比小国受益更多。
Nat Food. 2024 Jun;5(6):491-498. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-00992-1. Epub 2024 May 24.
8
National food production stabilized by crop diversity.作物多样性稳定了国家的粮食生产。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7764):257-260. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1316-y. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Diversity increases yield but reduces harvest index in crop mixtures.多样性增加产量,但降低作物混种的收获指数。
Nat Plants. 2021 Jul;7(7):893-898. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00948-4. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Agrobiodiversity and in situ conservation in ethnic minority communities of Xishuangbanna in Yunnan Province, Southwest China.中国西南部云南省西双版纳少数民族社区的农业生物多样性与原地保护
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 May 15;13(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0158-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Using landscape genomics to infer genomic regions involved in environmental adaptation of soybean genebank accessions.利用景观基因组学推断大豆基因库种质环境适应性相关的基因组区域。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1175. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-07202-5.
2
Shifting Herbal Knowledge: The Ecological and Cultural Dynamics Behind Plant Use Changes in the Southern Occitan Alps.变迁的草药知识:南奥克西塔尼阿尔卑斯山植物利用变化背后的生态与文化动态
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jan 25;14(3):367. doi: 10.3390/plants14030367.
3
An integrated genomic and biochemical approach to investigate the potentiality of heirloom tomatoes: Breeding resources for food quality and sustainable agriculture.

本文引用的文献

1
Commercial Plant Production and Consumption Still Follow the Latitudinal Gradient in Species Diversity despite Economic Globalization.尽管经济全球化,但商业植物生产和消费仍遵循物种多样性的纬度梯度。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0163002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163002. eCollection 2016.
2
Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives.作物野生近缘种的全球保护重点。
Nat Plants. 2016 Mar 21;2:16022. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.22.
3
Crop Diversity: An Unexploited Treasure Trove for Food Security.作物多样性:未开发的食品安全宝库
一种综合基因组学和生物化学方法来研究传统番茄的潜力:食品质量和可持续农业的育种资源。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 4;13:1031776. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1031776. eCollection 2022.
4
Climate change in the Catalan Pyrenees intersects with socioeconomic factors to shape crop diversity and management.加泰罗尼亚比利牛斯山脉的气候变化与社会经济因素相互交织,从而塑造了作物多样性和管理方式。
Agron Sustain Dev. 2022;42(5):91. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00806-3. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
5
Temporal and regional shifts of crop species diversity in rainfed and irrigated cropland in Iran.伊朗雨养和灌溉农田作物物种多样性的时间和区域变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0264702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264702. eCollection 2022.
6
Phylogenetic diversity and conservation of crop wild relatives in Colombia.哥伦比亚农作物野生近缘种的系统发育多样性与保护
Evol Appl. 2021 Sep 16;14(11):2603-2617. doi: 10.1111/eva.13295. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
National-scale changes in crop diversity through the Anthropocene.人类世背景下的作物多样性的国家尺度变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99728-5.
8
Crop origins explain variation in global agricultural relevance.作物起源解释了全球农业相关性的变化。
Nat Plants. 2021 May;7(5):598-607. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00905-1. Epub 2021 May 13.
9
Biodiversity in Tomatoes: Is It Reflected in Nutrient Density and Nutritional Yields Under Organic Outdoor Production?番茄中的生物多样性:它是否反映在有机露天生产下的营养密度和营养产量中?
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 24;11:589692. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.589692. eCollection 2020.
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 May;21(5):365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.02.006.
4
An enhanced calibration of a recently released megatree for the analysis of phylogenetic diversity.对最近发布的用于系统发育多样性分析的巨树进行增强校准。
Braz J Biol. 2016 Apr 19;76(3):619-28. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.20814.
5
BIOGEOGRAPHY. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene.生物地理学。在人类世,外来物种的扩散重新定义了生物地理学。
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):1248-51. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8913.
6
Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology.改善间作:农学、植物生理学与生态学研究综述
New Phytol. 2015 Apr;206(1):107-117. doi: 10.1111/nph.13132. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
7
Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security.全球食物供应的同质性不断增加及其对食品安全的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 18;111(11):4001-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313490111. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
The taxonomic name resolution service: an online tool for automated standardization of plant names.分类名称解析服务:一个用于植物名称自动标准化的在线工具。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 16;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-16.
9
Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops.作物驯化的模式和过程:对 203 种全球粮食作物的历史回顾和定量分析。
New Phytol. 2012 Oct;196(1):29-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04253.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
10
Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology.辣:用于整合系统发育和生态学的 R 工具。
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166. Epub 2010 Apr 15.