Scandiani M, Ferri M, Ferrari B, Formento N, Carmona M, Luque A, Balatti P
Lab. Agr. Río Paraná, Ruiz Moreno 225 (2930) San Pedro, Argentina.
Don Mario Semillas, R 7 km 208, (6740) Chacabuco, Argentina.
Plant Dis. 2012 Jul;96(7):1067. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-12-0154-PDN.
During the growing seasons of 2008 to 2009 and 2009 to 2010, severe outbreaks of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) frogeye leaf spot, a disease caused by Cercospora sojina Hara, occurred in several areas in Argentina (1). Two surveys were conducted in soybean fields, one in 2008 that included the provinces of Buenos Aires, Córdoba, and Santa Fe, and another that was performed in 2009 in the same provinces plus three others: Entre Ríos, Santiago del Estero, and Tucumán. In both surveys, plants presented circular lesions with reddish brown-to-gray spots and bordered by typical, narrow, reddish purple margins (3). To promote sporulation and to enable identification of the causal agent, leaves of diseased plants were collected and placed in a moist chamber for 24 h with a 12-h light cycle at 25°C. Conidia were plated on potato dextrose agar medium amended with streptomycin and were incubated at 25°C and 12 h of fluorescent light. Isolated cultures sporulated in 10 days and, on the basis of their morphology, were identified as C. sojina. A total of 147 isolates were deposited at the Culture Collection of CEREMIC (Centro de Referencia de Micología). They produced one- to nine-septate hyaline, elongate to fusiform conidia that measured 54.9 ± 16.2 × 5.7 ± 1.0 μm. Six isolates of C. sojina, each representing a province, were inoculated on a set of 12 differential soybean cultivars: Lee, Davis, Hood, Richland, Lincoln, Kent, Tracy, S 100, Palmetto, Peking, CNS, and Blackhawk (2). Fifteen plants of each differential were sprayed at V3 growth stage with a suspension of 6 × 10 conidia/ml. The test was conducted twice in a complete randomized design with three replicates. Control plants were sprayed with sterile distilled water. After inoculation, plants were placed in a greenhouse bench humidity chamber at 26 to 28°C for 72 h. Disease was rated 14 days after inoculation; plants with numerous lesions were considered susceptible and each of the 15 plants was given a score of 1. Plants with small or no lesions were classified as resistant and given a score of 0. Control plants remained healthy. The pathogen was reisolated from symptomatic plants and morphological characteristics were consistent with C. sojina. Based on the response of the differentials to each isolate and on the race designations, the isolates from Buenos Aires, Córdoba, Santa Fe, and Tucumán belong to race 11, while those from Santiago del Estero and Entre Ríos province to race 12. The finding of these two races threatening soybean cultivars in Argentina may be indicative of additional races. Thus, the incorporation of multiple resistance genes may reduce the impact of the disease on soybean. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the identification of races of C. sojina in Argentina. References: (1) M. A. Carmona et al. Plant Dis. 93:966, 2009. (2) M. A. R. Mian et al. Crop Sci. 48:14, 2008. (3) D.V. Phillips. Page 20 in: Compendium of Soybean Diseases. 4th ed. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 1999.
在2008年至2009年以及2009年至2010年的生长季节,阿根廷多个地区爆发了严重的大豆(Glycine max (L.) Merr.)蛙眼病,该病由大豆尾孢菌(Cercospora sojina Hara)引起(1)。在大豆田进行了两次调查,一次在2008年,涵盖布宜诺斯艾利斯省、科尔多瓦省和圣菲省,另一次于2009年在相同省份以及另外三个省份进行:恩特雷里奥斯省、圣地亚哥 - 德尔埃斯特罗省和图库曼省。在这两次调查中,植株上出现圆形病斑,病斑有红棕色至灰色斑点,并以典型的窄红紫色边缘为界(3)。为促进孢子形成并确定病原菌,采集患病植株的叶片,置于湿度箱中,在25°C、12小时光照周期下放置24小时。将分生孢子接种在添加链霉素的马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基上,于25°C和12小时荧光灯下培养。分离培养物在10天内产生孢子,根据其形态特征鉴定为大豆尾孢菌。总共147个分离物保藏于CEREMIC(真菌学参考中心)的菌种保藏中心。它们产生1至9个隔膜的透明、细长至梭形的分生孢子,大小为54.9 ± 16.2 × 5.7 ± 1.0μm。选取代表每个省份的6个大豆尾孢菌分离物,接种在一组12个鉴别大豆品种上:Lee、Davis、Hood、Richland、Lincoln、Kent、Tracy、S 100、Palmetto、Peking、CNS和Blackhawk(2)。在V3生长阶段,给每个鉴别品种的15株植株喷洒浓度为6×10分生孢子/毫升的悬浮液。试验采用完全随机设计进行两次,每次三个重复。对照植株喷洒无菌蒸馏水。接种后,将植株置于26至28°C的温室台架湿度箱中72小时。接种14天后对病害进行评级;病斑众多的植株被视为感病,15株中的每一株都给予1分。病斑小或无病斑的植株被归类为抗病,给予0分。对照植株保持健康。从有症状的植株上重新分离出病原菌,其形态特征与大豆尾孢菌一致。根据鉴别品种对每个分离物的反应以及小种分类,来自布宜诺斯艾利斯省、科尔多瓦省圣菲省和图库曼省的分离物属于11号小种,而来自圣地亚哥 - 德尔埃斯特罗省和恩特雷里奥斯省的分离物属于12号小种。在阿根廷发现这两个威胁大豆品种的小种可能意味着还有其他小种存在。因此,引入多个抗性基因可能会降低该病对大豆的影响。据我们所知,这是在阿根廷鉴定大豆尾孢菌小种的首次报道。参考文献:(1)M. A. Carmona等人,《植物病害》93:966,2009年。(2)M. A. R. Mian等人,《作物科学》48:14,2008年。(3)D.V. Phillips,载于《大豆病害简编》第4版,APS出版社,明尼苏达州圣保罗,1999年,第20页。