Rosso M L, Vazquez A, Rainey K M
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061.
Plant Dis. 2011 Jul;95(7):878. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-11-0151.
Frogeye leaf spot of soybean (FLS) (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), caused by Cercospora sojina Hara, was first detected in Virginia in 1942 (1). During the 2008 growing season, a FLS survey was conducted in soybean fields in Virginia. This was the first FLS race survey conducted in Virginia. Typical frogeye leaf spot symptoms, as reported by Phillips (4), were observed on soybean leaves in Westmoreland County. During 2008, Westmoreland County planted 7,365 ha of soybean. Symptomatic leaves were collected from V06-1891, V06-1365, V05-4394, V04-8405, and Hutcheson cultivars from plants in growth stages R5 to R6. Leaves were placed in a moist chamber for 24 h at 21°C with 12-h light to induce sporulation. C. sojina was only recovered from V06-1365. Conidia were removed from the leaves, placed into V8 juice agar amended with rifampicin (10 mg ml) and ampicillin (0.25 g liter) and incubated at 21°C with 12-h light. Cultures with dark pigmentation and presence of conidia were observed after 3 weeks. Conidia matched the description of C. sojina (4). Conidia had three to nine septa, were hyaline, elongate to fusiform, and measured 3 to 6 × 25 to 40 μm. Race identification was conducted using the set of differentials reported by Mian et al. (3). Spores for inoculation were produced on soybean stem lima bean agar (SSLBA) media. Tencentimeter-diameter pots, each containing four plants, were used. The test was conducted twice in a complete randomized design with three replications. Seedlings were inoculated at the V3 growth stage with a spore suspension of 6 × 10 spores/ml. Control plants were sprayed with sterile distilled water. Plants were placed in a greenhouse bench humidity chamber at 21°C for 72 h. Disease rating was conducted 14 days after inoculation. Since the resistance to FLS is known to be controlled by single dominant genes, the FLS was scored as a qualitative trait (i.e., resistant versus susceptible) as previously done by Mian et al. (2). Plants that showed numerous, large, spreading lesions were classified as susceptible and each plant was given a score of 1. Plants that showed no lesions or only small lesions or flecks were classified as resistant and each plant was given a score of 0. Control plants remained healthy. On the basis of the reaction response of the isolate on the set of differentials and comparison with the proposed race designations of Mian et al. (3), the isolate was classified as race 11. Race 11 shows compatible reaction (susceptibility) on the soybean cv. Lincoln, which is the source of Rcs1 resistance gene, and incompatible reactions (resistance) on cvs. Peking, Davis, and Kent. The latter two cultivars are sources of the Rcs3 and Rcs2 genes, respectively. Successful development of soybean cultivars with FLS resistance not only depends on knowledge of the presence of resistance genes, but also on the understanding of the pathogen population structure. To our knowledge this is the first report of C. sojina race 11 from soybean in Virginia. Resistance to this race is conditioned by Rcs2, Rcs3, and the single dominant gene in Peking (3). We recommend use of Rcs3 and Rcs2 genes and the single dominant gene in Peking for resistance to FLS in Virginia. References: (1) S. B. Fenn. Plant Dis. Rep. 26:383, 1942. (2) M. A. R. Mian et al. Crop Sci. 39:1687, 1999. (3) M. A. R. Mian et al. Crop Sci. 48:14, 2008. (4) D. V. Phillips. Page 20 in: Compendium of Soybean Diseases. 4th ed. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, MN, 1999.
大豆蛙眼病(FLS)由大豆尾孢菌(Cercospora sojina Hara)引起,1942年在弗吉尼亚首次被发现(1)。在2008年生长季,对弗吉尼亚的大豆田进行了一次大豆蛙眼病调查。这是在弗吉尼亚进行的首次大豆蛙眼病生理小种调查。在威斯特摩兰县的大豆叶片上观察到了菲利普斯(4)所描述的典型蛙眼病症状。2008年,威斯特摩兰县种植了7365公顷大豆。从处于R5至R6生长阶段的V06 - 1891、V06 - 1365、V05 - 4394、V04 - 8405和哈奇森品种的植株上采集有症状的叶片。将叶片置于湿度箱中,在21°C、12小时光照条件下放置24小时以诱导产孢。仅从V06 - 1365上分离到了大豆尾孢菌。从叶片上取下分生孢子,放入添加了利福平(10毫克/毫升)和氨苄青霉素(0.25克/升)的V8汁琼脂中,在21°C、12小时光照条件下培养。3周后观察到有深色色素沉着且存在分生孢子的培养物。分生孢子符合大豆尾孢菌的描述(4)。分生孢子有3至9个隔膜,无色透明,细长至梭形,大小为3至6×25至40微米。使用米安等人(3)报道的鉴别品种组进行生理小种鉴定。接种用的孢子在大豆茎 - 利马豆琼脂(SSLBA)培养基上产生。使用直径10厘米的花盆,每个花盆种4株植物。试验采用完全随机设计进行了两次,每次3个重复。在V3生长阶段用6×10个孢子/毫升的孢子悬浮液对幼苗进行接种。对照植株喷洒无菌蒸馏水。将植株置于21°C的温室试验台湿度箱中72小时。接种后14天进行病情评级。由于已知对大豆蛙眼病的抗性由单个显性基因控制,因此像米安等人(2)之前所做的那样,将大豆蛙眼病作为一个质量性状(即抗病与感病)进行评分。表现出大量、大型、扩展性病斑的植株被归类为感病,每株得分为1。没有病斑或只有小病斑或斑点的植株被归类为抗病,每株得分为0。对照植株保持健康。根据该分离物在鉴别品种组上的反应以及与米安等人(根据该分离物在鉴别品种组上的反应以及与米安等人(3)提出的生理小种命名进行比较,该分离物被归类为11号生理小种。11号生理小种在携带Rcs1抗性基因的大豆品种林肯上表现为亲和反应(感病),而在品种北京、戴维斯和肯特上表现为非亲和反应(抗病)。后两个品种分别是Rcs3和Rcs2基因的来源。成功培育出抗大豆蛙眼病的大豆品种不仅取决于对抗性基因存在情况的了解,还取决于对病原菌群体结构 的认识。据我们所知,这是弗吉尼亚大豆上大豆尾孢菌11号生理小种的首次报道。对该生理小种的抗性由Rcs2、Rcs3以及北京品种中的单个显性基因决定(3)。我们建议在弗吉尼亚利用Rcs3、Rcs2基因以及北京品种中的单个显性基因来培育抗大豆蛙眼病的品种。参考文献:(1)S. B. Fenn。植物病害报告26:383,1942。(2)M. A. R. Mian等人。作物科学39:1687,1999。(3)M. A. R. Mian等人。作物科学48:14,2008。(4)D. V. Phillips。载于:《大豆病害简编》第4版。美国植物病理学会。明尼苏达州圣保罗,1999,第20页。 (原文中“Tencentimeter - diameter”疑有误,但按要求未修改翻译)