Yanez Carlos, Güemes Antonio, Navarro Ana, Vazquez Jacqueline, Moreno Alberto
Royo Villanova Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Lozano Blesa University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Jan 12;4(1):e000227. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000227. eCollection 2019.
The American College of Surgeons Bleeding Control Basic (BCon) course aimed at teaching hemorrhage control techniques in the USA had not yet been taught in Spain. The purpose of this study is to assess its implementation among students and healthcare employees in the Lozano Blesa University Hospital of Zaragoza, a middle-sized Spanish city.
The study was conducted in a University Hospital and at the University of Zaragoza, scheduling four free B-Con sessions from 2017 to 2018. Two groups were identified as forming the population: healthcare employees and medical students. An anonymous questionnaire was completed at the end of the course regarding content, applicability, usefulness, relevance, and satisfaction. Study variables were ranked from 0 to 10: poor (when graded from 0 to 3), fair (4 to 6) and good (7 to 10). Results were compared between the groups, expressed in percentages and χ tested to analyze significant differences if any.
Among the 83 individuals who completed the course, 46 were medical students and 37 healthcare employees; 61% women and 39% men; aged 21 years to 52 years. Attendees evaluated satisfaction with the highest grade (84%), followed by usefulness (73%), applicability (70%), and relevance (66%). There was no variable graded as poor. The comparison of perceptions between groups did not reveal statistical differences based on a 0.05 significance level.
We concluded that the B-Con course was valued as good for relevance, usefulness, applicability, and satisfaction by the majority of the studied population.
Level III.
美国外科医师学会基础出血控制（BCon）课程旨在在美国教授出血控制技术，但尚未在西班牙开展。本研究的目的是评估该课程在西班牙中型城市萨拉戈萨的洛萨诺·布莱萨大学医院的学生和医护人员中的实施情况。
本研究在一家大学医院和萨拉戈萨大学进行，于2017年至2018年安排了四次免费的B-Con课程。确定了两组人群：医护人员和医学生。课程结束时完成了一份关于内容、适用性、实用性、相关性和满意度的匿名问卷。研究变量的评分从0到10分：差（0至3分）、一般（4至6分）和好（7至10分）。对两组结果进行比较，以百分比表示，并进行χ检验以分析是否存在显著差异。
在完成课程的83人中，46人为医学生，37人为医护人员；女性占61%，男性占39%；年龄在21岁至52岁之间。参与者对满意度的评价最高（84%），其次是实用性（73%）、适用性（70%）和相关性（66%）。没有变量被评为差。基于0.05的显著性水平，两组之间的认知比较未发现统计学差异。
我们得出结论，大多数研究人群认为B-Con课程在相关性、实用性、适用性和满意度方面都很好。
三级。
