Suppr超能文献

雁类的迁徙路线连通性和交流主要由换羽迁徙驱动。

Flyway connectivity and exchange primarily driven by moult migration in geese.

作者信息

Kölzsch A, Müskens G J D M, Szinai P, Moonen S, Glazov P, Kruckenberg H, Wikelski M, Nolet B A

机构信息

1Department of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Am Obstberg 1, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.

2Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Mov Ecol. 2019 Jan 31;7:3. doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0148-6. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For the conservation and management of migratory species that strongly decrease or increase due to anthropological impacts, a clear delineation of populations and quantification of possible mixing (migratory connectivity) is crucial. Usually, population exchange in migratory species is only studied in breeding or wintering sites, but we considered the whole annual cycle in order to determine important stages and sites for population mixing in an Arctic migrant.

METHODS

We used 91 high resolution GPS tracks of Western Palearctic greater white-fronted geese () from the North Sea and Pannonic populations to extract details of where and when populations overlapped and exchange was possible. Overlap areas were calculated as dynamic Brownian bridges of stopover, nest and moulting sites.

RESULTS

Utilisation areas of the two populations overlapped only somewhat during spring and autumn migration stopovers, but much during moult. During this stage, non-breeders and failed breeders of the North Sea population intermixed with geese from the Pannonic population in the Pyasina delta on Taimyr peninsula. The timing of use of overlap areas was highly consistent between populations, making exchange possible. Two of our tracked geese switched from the North Sea population flyway to the Pannonic flyway during moult on Taimyr peninsula or early during the subsequent autumn migration. Because we could follow one of them during the next year, where it stayed in the Pannonic flyway, we suggest that the exchange was long-term or permanent.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified long-distance moult migration of failed or non-breeders as a key phenomenon creating overlap between two flyway populations of geese. This supports the notion of previously suggested population exchange and migratory connectivity, but outside of classically suggested wintering or breeding sites. Our results call for consideration of moult migration and population exchange in conservation and management of our greater white-fronted geese as well as other waterfowl populations.

摘要

背景

对于因人类活动影响而数量急剧减少或增加的迁徙物种,明确划分种群并量化可能的混合情况(迁徙连通性)至关重要。通常,迁徙物种的种群交换仅在繁殖地或越冬地进行研究,但我们考虑了整个年度周期,以确定北极迁徙物种种群混合的重要阶段和地点。

方法

我们使用了来自北海和潘诺尼亚种群的91条西古北区白额雁()的高分辨率GPS轨迹,以提取种群在何时何地重叠以及可能发生交换的详细信息。重叠区域通过中途停留地、巢穴和换羽地的动态布朗桥进行计算。

结果

两个种群的利用区域仅在春秋季迁徙中途停留期间有一定程度的重叠,但在换羽期间重叠程度较大。在此阶段,北海种群的非繁殖个体和繁殖失败的个体与来自潘诺尼亚种群的大雁在泰梅尔半岛的皮亚西纳三角洲混在一起。种群之间对重叠区域的利用时间高度一致,使得交换成为可能。我们追踪的两只大雁在泰梅尔半岛换羽期间或随后秋季迁徙早期从北海种群的迁徙路线切换到了潘诺尼亚种群的迁徙路线。由于我们能够在次年追踪其中一只,发现它留在了潘诺尼亚种群的迁徙路线上,因此我们认为这种交换是长期的或永久性的。

结论

我们已确定繁殖失败或非繁殖个体的长途换羽迁徙是导致两个大雁迁徙路线种群重叠的关键现象。这支持了先前提出的种群交换和迁徙连通性的观点,但发生在传统上认为的越冬地或繁殖地之外。我们的研究结果呼吁在白额雁以及其他水鸟种群的保护和管理中考虑换羽迁徙和种群交换。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d78/6354378/9a5792c28b79/40462_2019_148_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验