University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2019 Jun;49(6):808-818. doi: 10.1111/cea.13361. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Confirmation of the clinical relevance of sensitisation is important for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.
To investigate the usefulness of an in vitro basophil activation test and component-resolved diagnosis in distinguishing between symptomatic allergic rhinitis patients and asymptomatic sensitization to house dust mites (HDMs).
Thirty-six subjects with a positive skin prick test (SPT) for HDM were divided into a symptomatic (n = 17) and an asymptomatic (n = 19) group on the basis of their clinical history and a nasal provocation test. A basophil CD63 response to in vitro stimulation with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus whole allergen extract and the IgE reactivity profiles for Der p 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 21, 23 were evaluated. Serum IgE and IgG specific to D pteronyssinus whole allergen extract and total IgE were measured.
There were no statistically significant differences in the levels of IgE (IgE levels were higher in symptomatic patients with P = 0.055) and IgG specific to D pteronyssinus and total IgE. Symptomatic patients showed a lower threshold for in vitro basophil activation (3.33 ng/mL vs 33.3 ng/mL), a higher area under the curve (AUC) of basophil activation (171 vs 127) (P = 0.017), a higher response to positive control with anti-FcεRI stimulation (97% vs 79%) (P < 0.001), a recognition of more HDM allergens (4 vs 2) and more frequent sensitization to rDer p 7 (P = 0.016) and rDer p 23 compared to asymptomatic subjects (P = 0.018). There was a positive correlation (r = 0.63; P < 0.001) between the number of recognized allergens and the AUC of basophil activation.
In the subjects studied, the differences in the basophil response to D pteronyssinus allergen extract, number of recognized HDM allergens and reactivity to rDer p 7 and rDer p 23 distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic HDM sensitisation better than SPT or allergen extract-specific IgE. Information regarding the clinical relevance of sensitization is important for the prescription of allergen-specific immunotherapy.
确认致敏的临床相关性对于过敏性鼻炎的诊断很重要。
研究体外嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验和成分分辨诊断在区分有症状的过敏性鼻炎患者和无症状的屋尘螨(HDM)致敏中的有用性。
36 名对 HDM 皮肤点刺试验(SPT)呈阳性的受试者根据其临床病史和鼻激发试验分为有症状(n=17)和无症状(n=19)组。评估体外刺激后嗜碱性粒细胞 CD63 反应对屋尘螨全过敏原提取物的反应,以及 Der p 1、2、4、5、7、10、11、14、15、18、21、23 的 IgE 反应谱。测量血清 IgE 和针对 D pteronyssinus 全过敏原提取物和总 IgE 的特异性 IgG。
无症状患者的 IgE 水平(P=0.055)和针对 D pteronyssinus 的特异性 IgG 和总 IgE 水平没有统计学差异。有症状患者的体外嗜碱性粒细胞激活的阈值较低(3.33ng/mL 比 33.3ng/mL),激活的曲线下面积(AUC)较高(171 比 127)(P=0.017),对 FcεRI 刺激的阳性对照的反应较高(97%比 79%)(P<0.001),识别更多的 HDM 过敏原(4 比 2),对 rDer p 7(P=0.016)和 rDer p 23 的致敏频率更高,无症状患者(P=0.018)。识别的过敏原数量与嗜碱性粒细胞激活的 AUC 之间存在正相关(r=0.63;P<0.001)。
在研究的受试者中,对 D pteronyssinus 过敏原提取物的嗜碱性粒细胞反应、识别的 HDM 过敏原数量以及对 rDer p 7 和 rDer p 23 的反应能力可以更好地区分有症状和无症状的 HDM 致敏,优于 SPT 或过敏原提取物特异性 IgE。致敏的临床相关性信息对于过敏原特异性免疫治疗的处方很重要。