Suppr超能文献

我们是否对化疗引起的周围神经病的评估存在偏差?对接受神经毒性化疗的患者进行前瞻性、多国、纵向队列研究的评估方法分析。

Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy.

机构信息

School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China.

Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5302-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the prevalence and assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). This study explored CIPN natural history and its characteristics in patients receiving taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multi-country multisite prospective longitudinal observational study. Patients were assessed before commencing and three weekly during chemotherapy for up to six cycles, and at 6,9, and 12 months using clinician-based scales (NCI-CTCAE; WHO-CIPN criterion), objective assessments (cotton wool test;10 g monofilament); patient-reported outcome measures (FACT/GOG-Ntx; EORTC-CIPN20), and Nerve Conduction Studies.

RESULTS

In total, 343 patients were recruited in the cohort, providing 2399 observations. There was wide variation in CIPN prevalence rates using different assessments (14.2-53.4%). Prevalence of sensory neuropathy (and associated symptom profile) was also different in each type of chemotherapy, with paclitaxel (up to 63%) and oxaliplatin (up to 71.4%) showing the highest CIPN rates in most assessments and a more complex symptom profile. Peak prevalence was around the 6-month assessment (up to 71.4%). Motor neurotoxicity was common, particularly in the docetaxel subgroup (up to 22.1%; detected by NCI-CTCAE). There were relatively moderately-to-low correlations between scales (r = 0.15,p < 0.05-r = 0.48 p < 0.001), suggesting that they measure different neurotoxicity aspects from each other. Cumulative chemotherapy dose was not associated with onset and course of CIPN.

CONCLUSION

The historical variation reported in CIPN incidence and prevalence is possibly confounded by disagreement between assessment modalities. Clinical practice should consider assessment of motor neuropathy for neurotoxic chemotherapy. Current scales may not be all appropriate to measure CIPN in a valid way, and a combination of scales are needed.

摘要

背景

关于化疗引起的周围神经病(CIPN)的发生率和评估,文献中存在不一致之处。本研究探讨了接受紫杉烷类和铂类化疗的患者的 CIPN 自然史及其特征。

患者和方法

多国家多地点前瞻性纵向观察研究。患者在开始化疗前和化疗的三个每周期间进行评估,最多 6 个周期,然后在 6、9 和 12 个月时使用临床医生为基础的量表(NCI-CTCAE;WHO-CIPN 标准)、客观评估(棉絮测试;10g 单丝)、患者报告的结果测量(FACT/GOG-Ntx;EORTC-CIPN20)和神经传导研究进行评估。

结果

共招募了 343 名患者,提供了 2399 次观察。使用不同评估方法,CIPN 的发生率差异很大(14.2-53.4%)。每种化疗药物的感觉神经病(和相关症状特征)的发生率也不同,紫杉醇(高达 63%)和奥沙利铂(高达 71.4%)在大多数评估中显示出最高的 CIPN 率和更复杂的症状特征。患病率高峰在 6 个月评估时(高达 71.4%)。运动神经毒性很常见,特别是在多西他赛亚组(高达 22.1%;通过 NCI-CTCAE 检测)。量表之间的相关性相对较低(r=0.15,p<0.05-r=0.48,p<0.001),表明它们彼此测量不同的神经毒性方面。累积化疗剂量与 CIPN 的发病和病程无关。

结论

CIPN 发生率和患病率的历史变化可能因评估方式的不一致而受到混淆。临床实践应考虑评估神经毒性化疗的运动神经病变。目前的量表可能并不都适合以有效的方式测量 CIPN,需要使用组合量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8000/6368751/5a711dd58ddb/12885_2019_5302_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验