Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 15;86(2):97-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.015. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
Genetics provides two major opportunities for understanding human disease-as a transformative line of etiological inquiry and as a biomarker for heritable diseases. In psychiatry, biomarkers are very much needed for both research and treatment, given the heterogenous populations identified by current phenomenologically based diagnostic systems. To date, however, useful and valid biomarkers have been scant owing to the inaccessibility and complexity of human brain tissue and consequent lack of insight into disease mechanisms. Genetic biomarkers are therefore especially promising for psychiatric disorders. Genome-wide association studies of common diseases have matured over the last decade, generating the knowledge base for increasingly informative individual-level genetic risk prediction. In this review, we discuss fundamental concepts involved in computing genetic risk with current methods, strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, assessments of utility, and applications to various psychiatric disorders and related traits. Although genetic risk prediction has become increasingly straightforward to apply and common in published studies, there are important pitfalls to avoid. At present, the clinical utility of genetic risk prediction is still low; however, there is significant promise for future clinical applications as the ancestral diversity and sample sizes of genome-wide association studies increase. We discuss emerging data and methods aimed at improving the value of genetic risk prediction for disentangling disease mechanisms and stratifying subjects for epidemiological and clinical studies. For all applications, it is absolutely critical that polygenic risk prediction is applied with appropriate methodology and control for confounding to avoid repeating some mistakes of the candidate gene era.
遗传学为理解人类疾病提供了两个主要机会——作为一种变革性的病因学研究方法,以及作为遗传性疾病的生物标志物。在精神病学中,鉴于当前基于现象学的诊断系统所确定的异质人群,研究和治疗都非常需要生物标志物。然而,由于人脑组织的不可及性和复杂性,以及对疾病机制的缺乏了解,迄今为止,还缺乏有用和有效的生物标志物。因此,遗传生物标志物对精神疾病尤其有前途。过去十年,常见疾病的全基因组关联研究已经成熟,为越来越有信息的个体遗传风险预测提供了知识库。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了使用当前方法计算遗传风险所涉及的基本概念、各种方法的优缺点、效用评估以及在各种精神障碍和相关特征中的应用。尽管遗传风险预测的应用变得越来越简单,并且在已发表的研究中也很常见,但仍有一些重要的陷阱需要避免。目前,遗传风险预测的临床实用性仍然较低;然而,随着全基因组关联研究的祖先多样性和样本量的增加,它在未来的临床应用中具有重要的前景。我们讨论了旨在提高遗传风险预测对疾病机制的解析和对流行病学和临床研究的受试者分层的价值的新兴数据和方法。对于所有应用,都绝对需要使用适当的方法学和混杂控制来应用多基因风险预测,以避免重复候选基因时代的一些错误。