• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PI-RADS(版本 2)3、4、5 级病变中的假阳性:与读者经验和区域位置的关系。

False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Mar;44(3):1044-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01919-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-019-01919-2
PMID:30737547
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of reader experience and zonal location on the occurrence of false positives (FPs) in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions on multiparametric (MP)-MRI of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 139 patients who had consecutively undergone an MP-MRI of the prostate in combination with a transrectal ultrasound MRI fusion-guided biopsy between 2014 and 2017. MRI exams were prospectively read by a group of inexperienced radiologists (cohort 1; 54 patients) and an experienced radiologist (cohort 2; 85 patients). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association of experience of the radiologist and zonal location with a FP reading. FP rates were compared between readings by inexperienced and experienced radiologists according to zonal location, using Chi-square (χ) tests.

RESULTS

A total of 168 lesions in 139 patients were detected. Median patient age was 68 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 62.5-73), and median PSA was 10.9 ng/mL (IQR 7.6-15.9) for the entire patient cohort. According to multivariable logistic regression, inexperience of the radiologist was significantly (P = 0.044, odds ratio 1.927, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.017-3.651) and independently associated with a FP reading, while zonal location was not (P = 0.202, odds ratio 1.444, 95% CI 0.820-2.539). In the transition zone (TZ), the FP rate of the inexperienced radiologists 59% (17/29) was significantly higher (χP = 0.033) than that of the experienced radiologist 33% (13/40).

CONCLUSION

Inexperience of the radiologist is significantly and independently associated with a FP reading, while zonal location is not. Inexperienced radiologists have a significantly higher FP rate in the TZ.

摘要

目的

探讨读者经验和区域位置对前列腺多参数(MP)MRI 的 PIRADS(V2)3、4 和 5 级病变中假阳性(FP)发生的影响。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年间连续进行 MP-MRI 前列腺检查并结合经直肠超声 MRI 融合引导活检的 139 例患者。前瞻性地由一组无经验的放射科医生(队列 1;54 例患者)和有经验的放射科医生(队列 2;85 例患者)阅读 MRI 检查结果。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定放射科医生经验和区域位置与 FP 阅读之间的关联。根据区域位置,使用卡方(χ)检验比较无经验和有经验的放射科医生阅读之间的 FP 率。

结果

在 139 例患者中,共发现 168 个病灶。整个患者队列的中位年龄为 68 岁(四分位距 62.5-73),中位 PSA 为 10.9ng/ml(四分位距 7.6-15.9)。根据多变量逻辑回归分析,放射科医生经验不足与 FP 阅读显著相关(P=0.044,优势比 1.927,95%置信区间[CI]1.017-3.651),而区域位置无显著相关(P=0.202,优势比 1.444,95% CI 0.820-2.539)。在移行区(TZ),无经验放射科医生的 FP 率为 59%(17/29),明显高于有经验放射科医生的 33%(13/40)(χP=0.033)。

结论

放射科医生经验不足与 FP 阅读显著相关,而区域位置无显著相关。无经验的放射科医生在 TZ 中的 FP 率明显更高。

相似文献

1
False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location.PI-RADS(版本 2)3、4、5 级病变中的假阳性:与读者经验和区域位置的关系。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Mar;44(3):1044-1051. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01919-2.
2
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
3
MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting.前列腺的MRI-TRUS融合活检:临床环境下的图像融合质量
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(4):433-440. doi: 10.3233/CH-189308.
4
[Evaluation of the PI-RADSv2 classification in a cohort of patients who underwent a prostate fusion biopsy.].[对接受前列腺融合活检的患者队列中PI-RADSv2分类的评估。]
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Jan;73(1):1-10.
5
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists.前列腺磁共振成像解读在放射科医生之间存在很大差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
In-gantry MRI guided prostate biopsy diagnosis of prostatitis and its relationship with PIRADS V.2 based score.机架内磁共振成像引导下前列腺炎的前列腺活检诊断及其与基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版评分的关系
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr;61(2):212-215. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12555. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
7
Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard.使用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)版本 2 对 3T 多参数前列腺 MRI 与活检作为参考标准的相关性分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jan;44(1):252-258. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1696-8.
8
Comparison of PIRADS 3 lesions with histopathological findings after MRI-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in a real world-setting.在真实临床环境中,对前列腺MRI融合靶向活检后PIRADS 3类病变与组织病理学结果的比较。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(2):165-170. doi: 10.3233/CH-189407.
9
"In-bore" MRI-guided Prostate Biopsy Using an Endorectal Nonmagnetic Device: A Prospective Study of 70 Consecutive Patients.使用直肠内非磁性装置的“孔内”磁共振成像引导下前列腺活检:70例连续患者的前瞻性研究
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Jun;15(3):417-427. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.多参数前列腺 MRI 发现前列腺影像报告和数据系统版本 2 类别 5 病变的 MRI-超声融合靶向活检为假阳性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):W218-W225. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18680. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
PI-RADS in Predicting csPCa: A Comparison Between Academic and Nonacademic Centers.PI-RADS在预测临床显著前列腺癌中的应用:学术中心与非学术中心的比较
Prostate. 2025 Mar;85(4):337-343. doi: 10.1002/pros.24832. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
2
Optimizing prostate biopsy decision-making for patients with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions: novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based nomograms.优化前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)≥3级病变患者的前列腺活检决策:基于磁共振成像(MRI)的新型列线图
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8196-8210. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1072. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
3
Differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using qualitative and semi-quantitative indices of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
利用动态对比增强磁共振成像的定性和半定量指标鉴别临床显著性前列腺癌与临床非显著性前列腺癌。
Discov Oncol. 2024 Dec 18;15(1):770. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01668-9.
4
Prostate magnetic resonance imaging and the value of experience: An intrareader variability study.前列腺磁共振成像与经验的价值:一项阅片者内部变异性研究。
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Refining clinical decision strategies and prostate cancer detection through fine adjustments in the combination of PSA-derived parameters and MRI.通过对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)衍生参数与磁共振成像(MRI)组合进行微调来优化临床决策策略和前列腺癌检测。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6227-6228. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10734-3. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
6
Proteomic Identification of Small Extracellular Vesicle Proteins LAMB1 and Histone H4 for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Risk Stratification.蛋白质组学鉴定用于前列腺癌诊断和风险分层的小细胞外囊泡蛋白 LAMB1 和组蛋白 H4。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Jun;11(23):e2402509. doi: 10.1002/advs.202402509. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Using an artificial intelligence model to detect and localize visible clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter external validation study.使用人工智能模型在前列腺磁共振成像中检测和定位可见的临床显著前列腺癌:一项多中心外部验证研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):43-60. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-791. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
8
Prostate Cancer and Its Mimics-A Pictorial Review.前列腺癌及其影像学表现——图片综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;15(14):3682. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143682.
9
Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study.临床及前列腺多参数磁共振成像结果作为一般及临床显著前列腺癌风险的预测指标:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Curr Urol. 2023 Sep;17(3):147-152. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000173. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
10
False-positive magnetic resonance imaging prostate cancer correlates and clinical implications.磁共振成像前列腺癌假阳性的相关因素及临床意义。
Urol Ann. 2023 Jan-Mar;15(1):54-59. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_22_22. Epub 2022 Nov 8.