Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 11;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1270-4.
In 2012, the UK introduced medical revalidation, whereby to retain their licence all doctors are required to show periodically that they are up to date and fit to practise medicine. Early reports suggested that some doctors found the process overly onerous and chose to leave practice. This study investigates the effect of medical revalidation on the rate at which consultants (senior hospital doctors) leave NHS practice, and assesses any differences between the performance of consultants who left or remained in practice before and after the introduction of revalidation.
We used a retrospective cohort of administrative data from the Hospital Episode Statistics database on all consultants who were working in English NHS hospitals between April 2008 and March 2009 (n = 19,334), followed to March 2015. Proportional hazard models were used to identify the effect of medical revalidation on the time to exit from the NHS workforce, as implied by ceasing NHS clinical activity. The main exposure variable was consultants' time-varying revalidation status, which differentiates between periods when consultants were (a) not subject to revalidation-before the policy was introduced, (b) awaiting a revalidation recommendation and (c) had received a positive recommendation to be revalidated. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to compare the performance of those who left practice with those who remained in practice before and after the introduction of revalidation, as proxied by case-mix-adjusted 30-day mortality rates.
After 2012, consultants who had not yet revalidated were at an increased hazard of ceasing NHS clinical practice (HR 2.33, 95% CI 2.12 to 2.57) compared with pre-policy levels. This higher risk remained after a positive recommendation (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.06) but was statistically significantly reduced (p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant differences in mortality rates between those consultants who ceased practice and those who remained, after adjustment for multiple testing.
Revalidation appears to have led to greater numbers of doctors ceasing clinical practice, over and above other contemporaneous influences. Those ceasing clinical practice do not appear to have provided lower quality care, as approximated by mortality rates, when compared with those remaining in practice.
2012 年,英国引入了医疗再认证制度,要求所有医生定期证明自己具备最新的知识和技能,以保持行医资格。早期报告表明,一些医生认为该程序过于繁琐,并选择离开医疗行业。本研究旨在调查医疗再认证对顾问医生(高级医院医生)离开国民保健服务(NHS)行医的影响,并评估再认证引入前后离开或继续行医的顾问医生的表现差异。
我们使用了 2008 年 4 月至 2009 年 3 月期间在英格兰 NHS 医院工作的所有顾问医生的医院入院统计数据库的回顾性队列数据(n=19334),随访至 2015 年 3 月。使用比例风险模型确定医疗再认证对退出 NHS 劳动力队伍的时间的影响,这是通过停止 NHS 临床活动来暗示的。主要暴露变量是顾问医生随时间变化的再认证状态,它区分了顾问医生(a)不受再认证约束的时期(政策引入之前)、(b)等待再认证建议和(c)收到再认证推荐的时期。差异-差异分析用于比较引入再认证前后离开和继续行医的顾问医生的表现,以调整后的 30 天死亡率作为代理。
2012 年后,尚未进行再认证的顾问医生停止 NHS 临床实践的风险显著增加(HR 2.33,95%CI 2.12 至 2.57),与政策前水平相比。在收到积极建议后(HR 1.85,95%CI 1.65 至 2.06),这种风险仍然较高,但统计学上显著降低(p<0.001)。在进行多次检验调整后,我们发现停止行医的顾问医生与继续行医的顾问医生之间的死亡率没有统计学上的显著差异。
再认证似乎导致了更多的医生停止临床实践,超过了其他同期的影响。与继续行医的顾问医生相比,停止临床实践的医生似乎没有提供质量较低的护理,正如死亡率所估计的那样。