• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在核心活检标本中孤立的平坦上皮不典型增生与切除时低升级风险相关。

Isolated Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy Specimens Is Associated With a Low Risk of Upgrade at Excision.

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Apr 2;151(5):511-515. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy175.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqy175
PMID:30753261
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We present a retrospective review of 111 breast core biopsy specimens with flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and corresponding excision to better understand rates of upgrade following this diagnosis.

METHODS

In total, 252 breast core biopsy specimens were identified. Cases were excluded if biopsy slides or excision results were unavailable, for ipsilateral carcinoma or other findings warranting excision, or biopsy performed for indications other than mammographically detected calcifications. Coincident atypical lobular hyperplasia was not excluded. Diagnoses were confirmed by breast pathologists, and mammographic images were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 111 biopsy specimens with FEA were included. In subsequent excisions, one (1%) of 111 showed invasive carcinoma, 20 (18%) atypical ductal hyperplasia, 20 (18%) lobular neoplasia, 31 (28%) FEA, and 39 (35%) no atypical findings.

CONCLUSIONS

FEA on core biopsy specimens is associated with a low rate of upgrade to invasive carcinoma. Close follow-up may be a reasonable alternative to excision for isolated FEA on core needle biopsy specimens.

摘要

目的

我们回顾性分析了 111 例伴有平坦上皮不典型(FEA)的乳腺核心活检标本,并对相应的切除标本进行了研究,以更好地了解在诊断为 FEA 后升级为浸润性癌的比例。

方法

共分析了 252 例乳腺核心活检标本。如果活检切片或切除结果不可用、同侧癌或其他需要切除的发现、或活检是为了检测乳腺 X 线摄影发现的钙化以外的其他指征,则排除这些病例。同时排除伴有不典型小叶增生的病例。由乳腺病理学家对诊断进行确认,并对乳腺 X 线摄影图像进行了回顾。

结果

最终纳入了 111 例有 FEA 的活检标本。在后续的切除标本中,111 例中有 1 例(1%)为浸润性癌,20 例(18%)为非典型导管增生,20 例(18%)为小叶肿瘤,31 例(28%)为 FEA,39 例(35%)为无不典型发现。

结论

在核心活检标本中,FEA 与浸润性癌升级的发生率较低相关。对于核心针活检标本中孤立性 FEA,密切随访可能是切除的合理替代方案。

相似文献

1
Isolated Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy Specimens Is Associated With a Low Risk of Upgrade at Excision.在核心活检标本中孤立的平坦上皮不典型增生与切除时低升级风险相关。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Apr 2;151(5):511-515. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy175.
2
Classic lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: a clinical and radio-pathologic correlation study with follow-up excision biopsy.经典型乳腺小叶肿瘤的核心活检:临床与放射病理相关性研究,随访切除活检。
Mod Pathol. 2013 Jun;26(6):762-71. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.221. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
3
Flat Epithelial Atypia in Breast Core Needle Biopsies With Radiologic-Pathologic Concordance: Is Excision Necessary?乳腺芯针活检中与影像学-病理学一致的平坦上皮不典型性:是否需要切除?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):182-190. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001385.
4
Flat epithelial atypia: are we being too aggressive?平坦上皮不典型增生:我们是否过于激进?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(2):511-517. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05481-9. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Outcome of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion associated with epithelial proliferations with atypia diagnosed on breast core biopsy: results from a multicentric UK-based study.乳腺核心活检中诊断的伴有非典型上皮增生的放射状瘢痕/复杂硬化性病变的转归:一项基于英国的多中心研究结果。
J Clin Pathol. 2019 Dec;72(12):800-804. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205764. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.在粗针活检中诊断出的高危乳腺病变的升级率:单机构经验及文献综述
Mod Pathol. 2016 Dec;29(12):1471-1484. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
Surgical excision of pure flat epithelial atypia identified on core needle breast biopsy.对在乳腺粗针活检中发现的单纯扁平上皮异型增生进行手术切除。
Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
8
Pure flat epithelial atypia (DIN 1a) on core needle biopsy: study of 60 biopsies with follow-up surgical excision.粗针活检中的单纯平坦上皮不典型增生(DIN 1a):60 例伴后续外科切除的活检研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jan;125(1):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1208-1. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy does not always mandate excisional biopsy.核心针活检中的扁平上皮不典型增生并非总是需要进行切除术活检。
Breast J. 2020 Apr;26(4):679-684. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13507. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
10
Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: Should it be excised?乳腺旋切针芯活检中扁平上皮异型增生的意义:是否应将其切除?
Hum Pathol. 2007 Jan;38(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Upgrade Rates and Breast Cancer Development Among Germline Pathogenic Variant Carriers with High-Risk Breast Lesions.胚系致病性变异携带者中具有高风险乳腺病变的升级率和乳腺癌发展情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):3120-3127. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14947-0. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
Isolated Flat Epithelial Atypia: Upgrade Outcomes After Multidisciplinary Review-Based Management Using Excision or Imaging Surveillance.孤立性扁平上皮异型增生:基于多学科评估管理采用切除或影像监测后的升级结果
J Breast Imaging. 2023 Jul 22;5(5):575-584. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad049. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
3
Are Columnar Cell Lesions the Earliest Non-Obligate Precursor in the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway?
柱状细胞病变是否是低级别乳腺肿瘤通路中最早的非必需前体?
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;29(8):5664-5681. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080447.
4
Upgrade Rate of Pure Flat Epithelial Atypia Diagnosed at Core Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在核心针活检中诊断为单纯平坦上皮不典型性的升级率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Jan 22;3(1):e200116. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200116. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.基于临床和影像学的多变量模型作为决策支持工具的性能,有助于避免高危乳腺病变的不必要手术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;185(2):479-494. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05947-1. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
Flat Epithelial Atypia in Breast Core Needle Biopsies With Radiologic-Pathologic Concordance: Is Excision Necessary?乳腺芯针活检中与影像学-病理学一致的平坦上皮不典型性:是否需要切除?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):182-190. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001385.