Lekatou Aristea, Metaxas Vasileios, Messaris Gerasimos, Antzele Penelope, Tzavellas George, Panayiotakis George
Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019 Dec 23;185(2):239-251. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncz005.
The objective of this study was to survey breast dose in screening mammography, establish institutional doses and compare them with the corresponding dose values. Three hundred women between the ages of 40 and 80 years old participated in the study. All mammographic examinations were performed with a digital mammography system. The women characteristics (age, weight, height, BMI), technical and exposure parameters (anode/filter material, projection, compressed breast thickness (CBT), compression force, tube voltage, tube load), the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the average glandular dose (AGD) were recorded. The mean, median, 75th and 95th percentiles of the AGD and ESD distributions were estimated for all examinations, for right and left breast, as well as for CBT within 55-65 mm, for Cranio-Caudal (CC) and Medio-Lateral Oblique (MLO) projections. A statistical analysis was also performed, to investigate the impact of the recorded parameters on the ESD and AGD. The mean/median values of the ESD and AGD for all examinations, for CC and MLO projections were 4.60/4.29 and 5.42/5.25 mGy and 1.18/1.13 and 1.32/1.30 mGy, respectively. The mean/median values of the ESD and AGD for CC and MLO projections at CBT range 55-65 mm were 5.29/5.08 and 5.56/5.42 mGy and 1.30/1.24 and 1.36/1.32 mGy, respectively. The 75th percentile for CC and MLO projections were estimated 5.79 and 6.17 mGy, as well as 1.41 and 1.48 mGy in terms of ESD and AGD values, respectively. The 95th percentile of the ESD and AGD for CC and MLO projections were also 7.40 and 7.53 mGy and 1.76 and 1.78 mGy, respectively. The tube voltage, tube load, age and CBT had a significant influence on the dose values. The estimated values were found to be comparable, or in most cases lower, than the corresponding 75th and 95th percentile values from previous studies.
本研究的目的是调查乳腺钼靶筛查中的乳房剂量,确定机构剂量并将其与相应的剂量值进行比较。300名年龄在40至80岁之间的女性参与了该研究。所有乳腺钼靶检查均使用数字乳腺钼靶系统进行。记录了女性的特征(年龄、体重、身高、BMI)、技术和曝光参数(阳极/滤过材料、投照方式、乳房压缩厚度(CBT)、压缩力、管电压、管负荷)、体表入射剂量(ESD)和平均腺体剂量(AGD)。估算了所有检查、左右乳房以及CBT在55 - 65毫米范围内、头尾位(CC)和内外斜位(MLO)投照的AGD和ESD分布的均值、中位数、第75百分位数和第95百分位数。还进行了统计分析,以研究记录参数对ESD和AGD的影响。所有检查、CC和MLO投照的ESD和AGD的均值/中位数分别为4.60/4.29和5.42/5.25 mGy以及1.18/1.13和1.32/1.30 mGy。CBT范围在55 - 65毫米时,CC和MLO投照的ESD和AGD的均值/中位数分别为5.29/5.08和5.56/5.42 mGy以及1.30/1.24和1.36/1.32 mGy。CC和MLO投照的第75百分位数在ESD和AGD值方面分别估计为5.79和6.17 mGy以及1.41和1.48 mGy。CC和MLO投照的ESD和AGD的第95百分位数也分别为7.40和7.53 mGy以及1.76和1.78 mGy。管电压、管负荷、年龄和CBT对剂量值有显著影响。发现估算值与先前研究的相应第75和第95百分位数相当,或在大多数情况下更低。