Radiology Division, "ISTITUTO NAZIONALE TUMORI - IRCCS - FONDAZIONE G. PASCALE, NAPOLI, ITALIA", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Radiology Division, "UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II", Via Pansini, Naples, Italy.
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108912. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108912. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
To quantitatively assess the dose of Dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to investigate the relationship between average absorbed glandular dose (AGD), compressed breast thickness (CBT) and compression force (CF).
All CEDM and DBT examinations were performed in cranio-caudal (CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO) view. Exposure parameters of 135 mammographic procedures that using AEC (automatic exposure control) mode were recorded. AGDs were calculated. Kruskal Wallis test was performed.
CBT population ranged from 23 to 94 mm with a thickness median value of 52 mm in CC view and of 57 mm in MLO views. CEDM AGD median value was significatively lower than DBT AGD in each views (p << 0.01). AGD showed a positive correlation and linear regression with CBT for both CEDM and DBT while CF did not show a correlation and linear regression with AGD. The highest values were found for MLO view: R of 0.74 for CEDM and R of 0.61 for DBT. Kruskal Wallis test shows that there was a difference statistically significant between AGD values of CEDM and DBT in CC view respect to MLO views (p < 0.01).
Dose values of both techniques meet the recommendations for maximum dose in mammography. The results of the present study indicated that there was significant difference between AGD for CEDM and DBT exposure in different views (AGD in CC views had the lowest value) and that CBT could influence the AGD while CF was not correlated to AGD.
定量评估双能对比增强数字乳腺摄影术(CEDM)和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)的剂量,并研究平均腺体吸收剂量(AGD)、压缩乳腺厚度(CBT)和压缩力(CF)之间的关系。
所有 CEDM 和 DBT 检查均在头尾(CC)和内外斜(MLO)位进行。记录了 135 例使用自动曝光控制(AEC)模式的乳腺摄影术的曝光参数。计算 AGD。进行 Kruskal-Wallis 检验。
CBT 人群的范围从 23 到 94mm,CC 位的厚度中位数为 52mm,MLO 位为 57mm。CEDM AGD 的中位数在每个视图中均显著低于 DBT AGD(p<<0.01)。AGD 与 CBT 呈正相关和线性回归,而 CF 与 AGD 没有相关性和线性回归。MLO 位的数值最高:CEDM 的 R 为 0.74,DBT 的 R 为 0.61。Kruskal-Wallis 检验表明,CC 位和 MLO 位的 CEDM 和 DBT 的 AGD 值之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p<0.01)。
两种技术的剂量值均符合乳腺摄影术最大剂量的建议。本研究结果表明,在不同视图中,CEDM 和 DBT 曝光的 AGD 值存在显著差异(CC 视图中的 AGD 值最低),CBT 可以影响 AGD,而 CF 与 AGD 无关。