Emilio Cassia Caroline, Mingotti Cintia Fernanda Bertagni, Fiorin Paula Regina, Lima Leydiane Araujo, Muniz Raisa Lemos, Bigotto Luis Henrique, Marchi Evaldo, Ponte Eduardo Vieira
. Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Jundiaí (SP) Brasil.
. Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Jundiaí (SP) Brasil.
J Bras Pneumol. 2019 Feb 11;45(1):e20180052. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20180052.
To determine whether a low level of education is a risk factor for uncontrolled asthma in a population of patients who have access to pulmonologists and to treatment.
This was a cross-sectional study involving outpatients > 10 years of age diagnosed with asthma who were followed by a pulmonologist for at least 3 months in the city of Jundiai, located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The patients completed a questionnaire specifically designed for this study, the 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (to assess the control of asthma symptoms), and a questionnaire designed to assess treatment adherence. Patients underwent spirometry, and patient inhaler technique was assessed.
358 patients were enrolled in the study. Level of education was not considered a risk factor for uncontrolled asthma symptoms (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94-1.05), spirometry findings consistent with obstructive lung disease (OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99-1.01), uncontrolled asthma (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.95-1.10), or the need for moderate/high doses of inhaled medication (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94-1.06). The number of years of schooling was similar between the patients in whom treatment adherence was good and those in whom it was poor (p = 0.08), as well as between those who demonstrated proper inhaler technique and those who did not (p = 0.41).
Among asthma patients with access to pulmonologists and to treatment, a low level of education does not appear to be a limiting factor for adequate asthma control.
确定在能够接触到肺科医生并接受治疗的患者群体中,低教育水平是否为哮喘控制不佳的风险因素。
这是一项横断面研究,纳入了巴西圣保罗州容迪亚伊市年龄大于10岁、被诊断为哮喘且由肺科医生随访至少3个月的门诊患者。患者完成了专门为本研究设计的问卷、6项哮喘控制问卷(用于评估哮喘症状的控制情况)以及一项用于评估治疗依从性的问卷。患者接受了肺活量测定,并对患者的吸入器使用技术进行了评估。
358名患者纳入本研究。教育水平未被视为哮喘症状控制不佳的风险因素(OR = 0.99;95% CI:0.94 - 1.05)、与阻塞性肺疾病一致的肺活量测定结果(OR = 1.00;95% CI:0.99 - 1.01)、哮喘控制不佳(OR = 1.03;95% CI:0.95 - 1.10)或需要中/高剂量吸入药物治疗的风险因素(OR = 0.99;95% CI:0.94 - 1.06)。治疗依从性良好的患者与依从性差的患者之间的受教育年限相似(p = 0.08),吸入器使用技术正确的患者与不正确的患者之间的受教育年限也相似(p = 0.41)。
在能够接触到肺科医生并接受治疗的哮喘患者中,低教育水平似乎不是充分控制哮喘的限制因素。