• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估经验证可在巴西使用的哮喘控制问卷。

Evaluation of the asthma control questionnaire validated for use in Brazil.

作者信息

Leite Mylene, Ponte Eduardo Vieira, Petroni Jaqueline, D'Oliveira Júnior Argemiro, Pizzichini Emílio, Cruz Alvaro Augusto

机构信息

Programa de Controle da Asma e Rinite Alérgica na Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brasil.

出版信息

J Bras Pneumol. 2008 Oct;34(10):756-63. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132008001000002.

DOI:10.1590/s1806-37132008001000002
PMID:19009207
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Portuguese version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a valid instrument to measure asthma control in adult outpatients in Brazil.

METHODS

We selected 278 outpatients diagnosed with asthma. All of the patients completed the questionnaire, underwent spirometry and were clinically evaluated by a physician in order to characterize the control of the disease in the first visit. The questionnaire was evaluated in three versions, with 5, 6 and 7 questions, respectively, and scores of 0.75 and 1.50 were used as cut-off points.

RESULTS

Of the 278 patients, 77 (27.7%) had intermittent asthma, 39 (14.0%) had mild persistent asthma, 40 (14.4%) had moderate persistent asthma and 122 (43.9%) had severe persistent asthma. The sensitivity of ACQ to identify uncontrolled asthma ranged from 77% to 99%, and the specificity ranged from 36% to 84%. The positive predictive value ranged from 73% to 90%, and the negative predictive value ranged from 67% to 95%. The positive likelihood ratio ranged from 1.55 to 4.81, and the negative likelihood ratio ranged from 0.03 to 0.27. In the 5- and 6-question versions of the ACQ, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.92. These two versions were both responsive to clinical changes in the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

All three versions of the ACQ satisfactorily discriminated between patients with uncontrolled asthma and those with controlled asthma. The 5- and 6-question versions also presented good reliability and responsiveness. Therefore, the ACQ is a valid tool for evaluating asthma control in adult outpatients in Brazil.

摘要

目的

评估葡萄牙语版哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)是否为衡量巴西成年门诊患者哮喘控制情况的有效工具。

方法

我们选取了278名被诊断为哮喘的门诊患者。所有患者均完成问卷,进行肺功能测定,并由医生进行临床评估,以在首次就诊时对疾病控制情况进行特征描述。问卷以三个版本进行评估,分别有5、6和7个问题,且分别以0.75和1.50的分数作为分界点。

结果

278名患者中,77名(27.7%)患有间歇性哮喘,39名(14.0%)患有轻度持续性哮喘,40名(14.4%)患有中度持续性哮喘,122名(43.9%)患有重度持续性哮喘。ACQ识别未控制哮喘的敏感性范围为77%至99%,特异性范围为36%至84%。阳性预测值范围为73%至90%,阴性预测值范围为67%至95%。阳性似然比范围为1.55至4.81,阴性似然比范围为0.03至0.27。在ACQ的5题和6题版本中,组内相关系数为0.92。这两个版本均对患者的临床变化有反应。

结论

ACQ的所有三个版本都能令人满意地区分未控制哮喘患者和已控制哮喘患者。5题和6题版本还具有良好的可靠性和反应性。因此,ACQ是评估巴西成年门诊患者哮喘控制情况的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the asthma control questionnaire validated for use in Brazil.评估经验证可在巴西使用的哮喘控制问卷。
J Bras Pneumol. 2008 Oct;34(10):756-63. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132008001000002.
2
[Portuguese-language version of the Asthma Control Test].[哮喘控制测试的葡萄牙语版本]
J Bras Pneumol. 2010 Mar-Apr;36(2):159-66. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132010000200002.
3
Cut-off points for defining asthma control in three versions of the Asthma Control Questionnaire.哮喘控制问卷三个版本中用于定义哮喘控制的切点。
J Asthma. 2010 Oct;47(8):865-70. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.491149.
4
Validation of the Spanish version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire.哮喘控制问卷西班牙语版本的验证
Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1918-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.005.
5
Utility of Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 in the assessment of asthma control.哮喘控制问卷 7 在评估哮喘控制中的效用。
J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):171-4. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132014000200011.
6
Prospective evaluation of current asthma control using ACQ and ACT compared with GINA criteria.使用 ACQ 和 ACT 与 GINA 标准对当前哮喘控制进行前瞻性评估。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
7
[Assessment of the simplified versions of the Asthma Control Questionnaire].[哮喘控制问卷简化版的评估]
Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Sep 20;131(9):326-32.
8
Measurement of asthma control according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines: a comparison with the Asthma Control Questionnaire.根据全球哮喘倡议指南测量哮喘控制情况:与哮喘控制问卷的比较。
Respir Res. 2012 Jun 22;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-50.
9
A psychometric comparison of three patient-based measures of asthma control.三种基于患者的哮喘控制测量方法的心理测量学比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Feb;23(2):369-77. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167426.
10
Can the Asthma Control Questionnaire be used to differentiate between patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma symptoms? A pilot study.哮喘控制问卷能否用于区分哮喘症状得到控制和未得到控制的患者?一项初步研究。
Fam Pract. 2006 Dec;23(6):674-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml041. Epub 2006 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of ADRB2 variants on bronchodilator response and asthma control in a mixed population.ADRB2基因变异对混合人群支气管扩张剂反应及哮喘控制的影响。
J Bras Pneumol. 2025 Aug 18;51(4):e20250066. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20250066. eCollection 2025.
2
Validity, Reproducibility, and Minimal Detectable Difference of the Functional Upper Extremity Function Test - Simplified Version - for Adults With Moderate to Severe Asthma and COPD.《简化版功能性上肢功能测试的有效性、可重复性和最小可检测差值:用于中重度哮喘和 COPD 成人》。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1058-1066. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10464. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Physical training in adults with asthma: An integrative approach on strategies, mechanisms, and benefits.
成人哮喘患者的体育锻炼:关于策略、机制及益处的综合方法
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Feb 17;4:1115352. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1115352. eCollection 2023.
4
Characteristics of individuals with moderate to severe asthma who better respond to aerobic training: a cluster analysis.中重度哮喘患者中对有氧运动训练反应更好的个体特征:聚类分析。
J Bras Pneumol. 2023 Feb 3;49(1):e20220225. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220225. eCollection 2023.
5
An online behavior change intervention to promote physical activity in adults with asthma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.一项旨在促进哮喘成人进行身体活动的在线行为改变干预措施:多中心随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Dec 7;23(1):983. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06881-x.
6
Prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype among severe asthma patients in Brazil: the BRAEOS study.巴西严重哮喘患者嗜酸性表型的流行情况:BRAEOS 研究。
J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Jul 8;48(3):e20210367. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210367. eCollection 2022.
7
Body Composition-Specific Asthma Phenotypes: Clinical Implications.体质特异性哮喘表型:临床意义。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 17;14(12):2525. doi: 10.3390/nu14122525.
8
PEDIATRIC ASTHMA: IMPACT OF THE DISEASE IN CHILDREN RECEIVING OUTPATIENT TREATMENT IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL.小儿哮喘:巴西南部接受门诊治疗的儿童患者的疾病影响。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2020;38:e2018398. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2020/38/2018398. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
9
Clinical features and associated factors with severe asthma in Salvador, Brazil.巴西萨尔瓦多重度哮喘的临床特征及相关因素
J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(3):e20180341. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20180341. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
2020 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of asthma.2020 年巴西胸科协会哮喘管理建议。
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Mar 2;46(1):e20190307. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190307. eCollection 2020.