• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过拟合密集的 A/C 曲线来估算 C 光合作用参数。

Estimating C photosynthesis parameters by fitting intensive A/C curves.

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 433 S University Ave., 314 Leidy Labs, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Photosynth Res. 2019 Aug;141(2):181-194. doi: 10.1007/s11120-019-00619-8. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11120-019-00619-8
PMID:30758752
Abstract

Measurements of photosynthetic assimilation rate as a function of intercellular CO (A/C curves) are widely used to estimate photosynthetic parameters for C species, yet few parameters have been reported for C plants, because of a lack of estimation methods. Here, we extend the framework of widely used estimation methods for C plants to build estimation tools by exclusively fitting intensive A/C curves (6-8 more sampling points) for C using three versions of photosynthesis models with different assumptions about carbonic anhydrase processes and ATP distribution. We use simulation analysis, out of sample tests, existing in vitro measurements and chlorophyll-fluorescence measurements to validate the new estimation methods. Of the five/six photosynthetic parameters obtained, sensitivity analyses show that maximal-Rubisco-carboxylation-rate, electron-transport-rate, maximal-PEP-carboxylation-rate, and carbonic-anhydrase were robust to variation in the input parameters, while day respiration and mesophyll conductance varied. Our method provides a way to estimate carbonic anhydrase activity, a new parameter, from A/C curves, yet also shows that models that do not explicitly consider carbonic anhydrase yield approximate results. The two photosynthesis models, differing in whether ATP could freely transport between RuBP and PEP regeneration processes yielded consistent results under high light, but they may diverge under low light intensities. Modeling results show selection for Rubisco of low specificity and high catalytic rate, low leakage of bundle sheath, and high PEPC affinity, which may further increase C efficiency.

摘要

作为细胞间 CO(A/C 曲线)函数的光合作用同化率的测量被广泛用于估计 C 物种的光合作用参数,但由于缺乏估计方法,很少有参数被报道用于 C 植物。在这里,我们扩展了广泛用于 C 植物的估计方法的框架,通过仅拟合 intensive A/C 曲线(6-8 个更多的采样点),使用三种不同的光合作用模型来构建估计工具,这些模型对碳酸酐酶过程和 ATP 分布有不同的假设。我们使用模拟分析、样本外测试、现有的体外测量和叶绿素荧光测量来验证新的估计方法。在获得的五个/六个光合作用参数中,敏感性分析表明,最大 RuBP 羧化酶羧化速率、电子传递速率、最大 PEP 羧化速率和碳酸酐酶对输入参数的变化具有鲁棒性,而白天呼吸和质膜导度则发生了变化。我们的方法提供了一种从 A/C 曲线估计碳酸酐酶活性的方法,这是一个新的参数,但也表明不明确考虑碳酸酐酶的模型会产生近似的结果。这两个光合作用模型,在 ATP 是否可以在 RuBP 和 PEP 再生过程之间自由运输方面存在差异,在高光下产生一致的结果,但在低光强度下可能会出现分歧。模型结果表明,Rubisco 具有低特异性和高催化速率、鞘细胞泄漏低和 PEPC 亲和力高的选择,这可能进一步提高 C 效率。

相似文献

1
Estimating C photosynthesis parameters by fitting intensive A/C curves.通过拟合密集的 A/C 曲线来估算 C 光合作用参数。
Photosynth Res. 2019 Aug;141(2):181-194. doi: 10.1007/s11120-019-00619-8. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Temperature Responses of C4 Photosynthesis: Biochemical Analysis of Rubisco, Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase, and Carbonic Anhydrase in Setaria viridis.C4光合作用的温度响应:绿色狗尾草中核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶、磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化酶和碳酸酐酶的生化分析
Plant Physiol. 2015 Nov;169(3):1850-61. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00586. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
3
Modelling (18)O2 and (16)O2 unidirectional fluxes in plants. III: fitting of experimental data by a simple model.植物中(18)O₂和(16)O₂单向通量的建模。III:用简单模型拟合实验数据。
Biosystems. 2013 Aug;113(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
4
Inconsistency of mesophyll conductance estimate causes the inconsistency for the estimates of maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation among the linear, rectangular and non-rectangular hyperbola biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis--a case study of CO₂ enrichment and leaf aging effects in soybean.叶肉导度估计的不一致导致了叶片光合作用线性、矩形和非矩形双曲线生化模型中核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶最大羧化速率估计的不一致——以大豆中二氧化碳富集和叶片衰老效应为例
Plant Sci. 2014 Sep;226:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
5
A new method to estimate photosynthetic parameters through net assimilation rate-intercellular space CO concentration (A-C ) curve and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements.一种通过净同化率-细胞间隙CO₂浓度(A-Ci)曲线和叶绿素荧光测量来估算光合参数的新方法。
New Phytol. 2017 Feb;213(3):1543-1554. doi: 10.1111/nph.14260. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Comparison of the A-Cc curve fitting methods in determining maximum ribulose 1.5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase carboxylation rate, potential light saturated electron transport rate and leaf dark respiration.用于确定最大核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶/加氧酶羧化速率、潜在光饱和电子传递速率和叶片暗呼吸的A-Cc曲线拟合方法比较
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Feb;32(2):109-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01900.x.
7
Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis.提高 C4 光合作用的策略。
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Jun;31:125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
8
Unsolved Problems of Carbonic Anhydrases Functioning in Photosynthetic Cells of Higher C3 Plants.高等 C3 植物光合作用细胞中碳酸酐酶作用的未解问题。
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2021 Oct;86(10):1243-1255. doi: 10.1134/S0006297921100072.
9
Lack of leaf carbonic anhydrase activity eliminates the C carbon-concentrating mechanism requiring direct diffusion of CO into bundle sheath cells.缺乏叶片碳酸酐酶活性会消除需要 CO2 直接扩散到维管束鞘细胞的 C 集中碳机制。
Plant Cell Environ. 2022 May;45(5):1382-1397. doi: 10.1111/pce.14291. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
Photosynthesis-related characteristics of the midrib and the interveinal lamina in leaves of the C3-CAM intermediate plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum.C3-CAM中间型植物冰叶日中花叶片中脉和叶脉间叶片的光合作用相关特性
Ann Bot. 2016 Jun;117(7):1141-51. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw049. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
PhotoGEA: An R Package for Closer Fitting of Photosynthetic Gas Exchange Data With Non-Gaussian Confidence Interval Estimation.PhotoGEA:一个用于通过非高斯置信区间估计更精确拟合光合气体交换数据的R软件包。
Plant Cell Environ. 2025 Jul;48(7):5104-5119. doi: 10.1111/pce.15501. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
2
Assessment of 3-Cyanobenzoic Acid as a Possible Herbicide Candidate: Effects on Maize Growth and Photosynthesis.3-氰基苯甲酸作为潜在除草剂候选物的评估:对玉米生长和光合作用的影响
Plants (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;14(1):1. doi: 10.3390/plants14010001.
3
C4 grasses employ distinct strategies to acclimate rubisco activase to heat stress.

本文引用的文献

1
Temperature response of mesophyll conductance in three C species calculated with two methods: O discrimination and in vitro V.用两种方法(O 同位素 discrimination 和离体 V)计算的三种 C 物种的叶肉导度温度响应
New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(1):66-80. doi: 10.1111/nph.14359. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
2
A compendium of temperature responses of Rubisco kinetic traits: variability among and within photosynthetic groups and impacts on photosynthesis modeling.核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶/加氧酶动力学特性的温度响应简编:光合类群之间和内部的变异性及其对光合作用建模的影响
J Exp Bot. 2016 Sep;67(17):5067-91. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw267. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
3
C4 植物采用不同的策略使 Rubisco 激活酶适应热胁迫。
Biosci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;44(10). doi: 10.1042/BSR20240353.
4
Mulched Drip Fertigation with Growth Inhibitors Reduces Bundle-Sheath Cell Leakage and Improves Photosynthesis Capacity and Barley Production in Semi-Arid Regions.覆盖滴灌施肥结合生长抑制剂可减少半干旱地区大麦维管束鞘细胞渗漏,提高光合能力及产量。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;13(2):239. doi: 10.3390/plants13020239.
5
Activation of CO assimilation during photosynthetic induction is slower in C than in C photosynthesis in three phylogenetically controlled experiments.在三项系统发育控制实验中,光合诱导期间CO同化的激活在C植物中比在C植物中更慢。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 4;13:1091115. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1091115. eCollection 2022.
6
Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Iranian licorice ( l.) accessions under salinity stress.盐分胁迫下伊朗甘草(Glycyrrhiza glabra L.)种质的光合作用与叶绿素荧光
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 7;13:984944. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.984944. eCollection 2022.
7
The limiting factors and regulatory processes that control the environmental responses of C, C-C intermediate, and C photosynthesis.控制 C、C-C 中间产物和 C 光合作用环境响应的限制因素和调节过程。
Oecologia. 2021 Dec;197(4):841-866. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-05062-y. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
MicroRNA156-mediated changes in leaf composition lead to altered photosynthetic traits during vegetative phase change.MicroRNA156 介导的叶片组成变化导致营养阶段转变过程中光合特性的改变。
New Phytol. 2021 Aug;231(3):1008-1022. doi: 10.1111/nph.17007. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Online CO2 and H2 O oxygen isotope fractionation allows estimation of mesophyll conductance in C4 plants, and reveals that mesophyll conductance decreases as leaves age in both C4 and C3 plants.
在线二氧化碳和水的氧同位素分馏能够估算C4植物的叶肉导度,并且揭示出在C4和C3植物中,叶肉导度均会随着叶片衰老而降低。
New Phytol. 2016 May;210(3):875-89. doi: 10.1111/nph.13830. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
4
Temperature Responses of C4 Photosynthesis: Biochemical Analysis of Rubisco, Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase, and Carbonic Anhydrase in Setaria viridis.C4光合作用的温度响应:绿色狗尾草中核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶、磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化酶和碳酸酐酶的生化分析
Plant Physiol. 2015 Nov;169(3):1850-61. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00586. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
Deriving C4 photosynthetic parameters from combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence using an Excel tool: theory and practice.使用Excel工具从气体交换和叶绿素荧光相结合的数据中推导C4光合参数:理论与实践
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Jun;39(6):1164-79. doi: 10.1111/pce.12626. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Temperature dependence of in vitro Rubisco kinetics in species of Flaveria with different photosynthetic mechanisms.不同光合机制的黄顶菊属植物中体外核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶动力学的温度依赖性
Photosynth Res. 2015 Apr;124(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s11120-015-0092-2. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
A high throughput gas exchange screen for determining rates of photorespiration or regulation of C4 activity.一种用于测定光呼吸速率或C4活性调节的高通量气体交换筛选方法。
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(13):3769-79. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru238. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
8
Bundle-sheath leakiness in C4 photosynthesis: a careful balancing act between CO2 concentration and assimilation.C4 光合作用中的束鞘渗漏:二氧化碳浓度与同化之间的谨慎平衡。
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(13):3443-57. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru157. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
9
Photosynthesis of C3, C3-C4, and C4 grasses at glacial CO2.冰川期二氧化碳浓度下C3、C3-C4和C4禾本科植物的光合作用。
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(13):3669-81. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru155. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
10
Stability-activity tradeoffs constrain the adaptive evolution of RubisCO.Rubisco 的适应性进化受到稳定性-活性权衡的限制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 11;111(6):2223-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310811111. Epub 2014 Jan 27.