Suppr超能文献

在学术医疗中心中,医师与行政管理人员关系的成长之痛及其对医师参与度的影响。

The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement.

机构信息

Center for Bioethics & Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

HuNamics, LLC, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0212014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212014. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION: This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.

CONCLUSIONS

A qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement.

摘要

背景

医生的参与度已成为医疗保健领导层的关键指标,与更好的医疗保健效果相关。然而,参与度往往较低,难以衡量和改善。本研究旨在高效描述学术医院医生和管理人员之间的专业文化动态,以及这些动态如何影响医生的参与度。

材料和方法

在 6 周内完成了定性混合方法分析,包括对医院系统历史的初步分析,该分析用于有针对性地招募 20 名跨专业的医生和 20 名跨管理级别的医疗管理人员进行半结构化访谈和观察。医生和管理人员的参与率分别达到 77%(20/26)和 83%(20/24)。队列由组织内经验从 1 到 35 年的男女均等组成。使用迭代归纳演绎方法系统地分析现场记录和转录本。出现的主题与组织内大约 400 名医生和管理人员一起呈现和讨论,以评估有效性和哪些结果最有意义。

结果与讨论

这项调查表明,专业文化脱节正在破坏改善医生参与度的努力。这种脱节进一步复杂化,因为少数(10%)人不相信存在问题,而且参与者往往提供类似的解决方案,不易察觉的矛盾内涵。医生和管理人员认为这些结果准确反映了他们的现实情况,并将这些信息用作改善医生参与度的共同语言来计划有针对性的干预措施。研究的局限性包括其在单一机构的横断面性质和适度的样本量。

结论

定性混合方法分析高效地确定了学术医院内的专业文化障碍,作为改善医生参与度的机构特定指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af40/6373942/56bbbbe55249/pone.0212014.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验