• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家卫生研究院超急性中风研究中心和 ENCHANTED 试验:增强研究基础设施对试验指标和患者结局的影响。

The National Institute for Health Research Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres and the ENCHANTED trial: the impact of enhanced research infrastructure on trial metrics and patient outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 13;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0417-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-019-0417-2
PMID:30760277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6375185/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The English National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network first established Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres (HSRCs) in 2010 to support multicentre hyperacute (< 9 h) and complex stroke research. We assessed the impact of this investment on research performance and patient outcomes in a post-hoc analysis of country-specific data from a large multicentre clinical trial.

METHODS

Comparisons of baseline, outcome and trial metric data were made for participants recruited to the alteplase-dose arm of the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke study (ENCHANTED) at National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network HSRCs and non-HSRCs between June 2012 and October 2015.

RESULTS

Among 774 ENCHANTED United Kingdom participants (41% female; mean age 72 years), 502 (64.9%) were recruited from nine HSRCs and 272 (35.1%) from 24 non-HSRCs. HSRCs had higher monthly recruitment rates (median 1.5, interquartile interval 1.4-2.2 vs. 0.7, 0.5-1.3; p = 0.01) and shorter randomisation-to-treatment times (2.6 vs. 3.1 min; p = 0.01) compared to non-HSRCs. HSRC participants were younger and had milder stroke severity, but clinically important between-group differences in 90-day death or disability outcomes remained after adjustment for minimisation criteria and important baseline variables at randomisation, whether defined by ordinal modified Rankin scale score shift (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.08; p = 0.15), scores 2 to 6 (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.01; p = 0.05), or scores 3 to 6 (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.17; p = 0.27). There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, nor heterogeneity in the comparative treatment effects between low- and standard-dose alteplase by HSRCs or non-HSRCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Infrastructure investment in HSRCs was associated with improved research performance metrics, particularly recruitment and time to treatment with clinically important, though not statistically significant, improvements in patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Unique identifier: NCT01422616 .

摘要

背景

英国国家健康研究协会临床研究网络于 2010 年首次成立了超急性中风研究中心(HSRCs),以支持多中心超急性(<9 小时)和复杂中风研究。我们通过对一项大型多中心临床试验的特定国家数据的事后分析,评估了这一投资对研究表现和患者结局的影响。

方法

比较 2012 年 6 月至 2015 年 10 月在国家健康研究协会临床研究网络的 HSRCs 和非 HSRCs 招募的国际强化控制高血压和溶栓中风研究(ENCHANTED)中阿替普酶剂量臂的参与者的基线、结局和试验指标数据。

结果

在 774 名 ENCHANTED 英国参与者中(41%为女性;平均年龄 72 岁),502 名(64.9%)来自 9 个 HSRCs,272 名(35.1%)来自 24 个非 HSRCs。HSRCs 的每月招募率较高(中位数 1.5,四分位间距 1.4-2.2 与 0.7,0.5-1.3;p=0.01),随机化至治疗的时间较短(2.6 与 3.1 分钟;p=0.01)与非 HSRCs 相比。HSRC 参与者更年轻,中风严重程度较轻,但调整最小化标准和随机化时重要的基线变量后,90 天死亡或残疾的组间临床重要结局差异仍然存在,无论是通过序贯改良 Rankin 量表评分变化来定义(调整后的 OR 0.82,95%CI 0.62-1.08;p=0.15),评分 2-6(调整后的 OR 0.71,95%CI 0.50-1.01;p=0.05),还是评分 3-6(调整后的 OR 0.82,95%CI 0.57-1.17;p=0.27)。症状性颅内出血无显著差异,且 HSRCs 和非 HSRCs 的低剂量和标准剂量阿替普酶的治疗效果比较也无异质性。

结论

HSRCs 的基础设施投资与研究表现指标的改善相关,特别是在招募和治疗时间方面,与患者结局的临床重要但无统计学显著改善相关。

试验注册

唯一标识符:NCT01422616。

相似文献

1
The National Institute for Health Research Hyperacute Stroke Research Centres and the ENCHANTED trial: the impact of enhanced research infrastructure on trial metrics and patient outcomes.国家卫生研究院超急性中风研究中心和 ENCHANTED 试验:增强研究基础设施对试验指标和患者结局的影响。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 13;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0417-2.
2
Influence of Renal Impairment on Outcome for Thrombolysis-Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke: ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study) Post Hoc Analysis.肾功能不全对溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中结局的影响:ENCHANTED(强化高血压控制和溶栓治疗卒中研究)事后分析。
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2605-2609. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017808. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Low- Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase in Patients on Prior Antiplatelet Therapy: The ENCHANTED Trial (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study).既往接受抗血小板治疗患者使用低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶的疗效对比:ENCHANTED试验(高血压与溶栓性中风强化控制研究)
Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1877-1883. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016274. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
Applicability of ENCHANTED trial results to current acute ischemic stroke patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis in England and Wales: Comparison with the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme registry.ENCHANTED 试验结果对目前适合在英格兰和威尔士接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的适用性:与 Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme 登记处的比较。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Oct;14(7):678-685. doi: 10.1177/1747493019841246. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Comparative effects of low-dose versus standard-dose alteplase in ischemic patients with prior stroke and/or diabetes mellitus: The ENCHANTED trial.缺血性卒中患者和/或糖尿病患者中低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶的比较效果:ENCHANTED 试验。
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Apr 15;387:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
6
Rationale, design, and progress of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial: An international multicenter 2 × 2 quasi-factorial randomized controlled trial of low- vs. standard-dose rt-PA and early intensive vs. guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis treatment.强化控制高血压与溶栓治疗卒中研究(ENCHANTED)试验的原理、设计与进展:一项国际多中心2×2准析因随机对照试验,针对符合溶栓治疗条件的急性缺血性卒中患者,比较低剂量与标准剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)以及早期强化降压与指南推荐降压的效果。
Int J Stroke. 2015 Jul;10(5):778-88. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12486. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
7
Clinical Utility of Electronic Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score Software in the ENCHANTED Trial Database.电子阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期 CT 评分软件在 ENCHANTED 试验数据库中的临床应用价值。
Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1407-1411. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019863. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Intensive blood pressure reduction with intravenous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): an international, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial.急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗的强化降压(ENCHANTED)试验:一项国际、随机、开放标签、盲终点、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):877-888. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30038-8. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
9
Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.低剂量与标准剂量静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2313-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515510. Epub 2016 May 10.
10
Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Secondary Analysis of the ENCHANTED Randomized Clinical Trial.急性缺血性卒中患者低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶治疗:ENCHANTED随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1328-1335. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2286.

引用本文的文献

1
If health organisations and staff engage in research, does healthcare improve? Strengthening the evidence base through systematic reviews.如果健康组织和工作人员参与研究,医疗保健是否会得到改善?通过系统评价加强证据基础。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01187-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Does a biomedical research centre affect patient care in local hospitals?生物医学研究中心会影响当地医院的患者护理吗?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jan 21;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0163-7.
2
High hospital research participation and improved colorectal cancer survival outcomes: a population-based study.高医院研究参与度与改善的结直肠癌生存结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Gut. 2017 Jan;66(1):89-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311308. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.低剂量与标准剂量静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2313-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515510. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review.医疗服务中强大研究文化的组织效益:一项系统综述
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):45-53. doi: 10.1071/AH15180.
5
NHS Trusts' clinical research activity and overall CQC performance - Is there a correlation?国民保健服务信托基金的临床研究活动与护理质量委员会的总体表现——两者存在关联吗?
Public Health. 2015 Nov;129(11):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
Rationale, design, and progress of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial: An international multicenter 2 × 2 quasi-factorial randomized controlled trial of low- vs. standard-dose rt-PA and early intensive vs. guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis treatment.强化控制高血压与溶栓治疗卒中研究(ENCHANTED)试验的原理、设计与进展:一项国际多中心2×2准析因随机对照试验,针对符合溶栓治疗条件的急性缺血性卒中患者,比较低剂量与标准剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)以及早期强化降压与指南推荐降压的效果。
Int J Stroke. 2015 Jul;10(5):778-88. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12486. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
7
Research activity and the association with mortality.研究活动及其与死亡率的关联。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0118253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118253. eCollection 2015.
8
Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.治疗延迟、年龄及卒中严重程度对阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中疗效的影响:来自随机试验的个体患者数据的荟萃分析
Lancet. 2014 Nov 29;384(9958):1929-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
9
Bigger, faster? Associations between hospital thrombolysis volume and speed of thrombolysis administration in acute ischemic stroke.医院溶栓量与急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗速度之间的关系:更大、更快?
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3129-35. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001981. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
10
Exploring gender distribution in patients with acute stroke: A multi-national approach.探索急性中风患者的性别分布:一种多国研究方法。
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):10-6.