Downing Amy, Morris Eva Ja, Corrigan Neil, Sebag-Montefiore David, Finan Paul J, Thomas James D, Chapman Michael, Hamilton Russell, Campbell Helen, Cameron David, Kaplan Richard, Parmar Mahesh, Stephens Richard, Seymour Matt, Gregory Walter, Selby Peter
Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Gut. 2017 Jan;66(1):89-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311308. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
In 2001, the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network (NCRN) was established, leading to a rapid increase in clinical research activity across the English NHS. Using colorectal cancer (CRC) as an example, we test the hypothesis that high, sustained hospital-level participation in interventional clinical trials improves outcomes for all patients with CRC managed in those research-intensive hospitals.
Data for patients diagnosed with CRC in England in 2001-2008 (n=209 968) were linked with data on accrual to NCRN CRC studies (n=30 998). Hospital Trusts were categorised by the proportion of patients accrued to interventional studies annually. Multivariable models investigated the relationship between 30-day postoperative mortality and 5-year survival and the level and duration of study participation.
Most of the Trusts achieving high participation were district general hospitals and the effects were not limited to cancer 'centres of excellence', although such centres do make substantial contributions. Patients treated in Trusts with high research participation (≥16%) in their year of diagnosis had lower postoperative mortality (p<0.001) and improved survival (p<0.001) after adjustment for casemix and hospital-level variables. The effects increased with sustained research participation, with a reduction in postoperative mortality of 1.5% (6.5%-5%, p<2.2×10) and an improvement in survival (p<10; 5-year difference: 3.8% (41.0%-44.8%)) comparing high participation for ≥4 years with 0 years.
There is a strong independent association between survival and participation in interventional clinical studies for all patients with CRC treated in the hospital study participants. Improvement precedes and increases with the level and years of sustained participation.
2001年,英国国家卫生研究院癌症研究网络(NCRN)成立,导致英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)内的临床研究活动迅速增加。以结直肠癌(CRC)为例,我们检验了以下假设:医院层面持续高度参与介入性临床试验可改善在这些研究密集型医院接受治疗的所有CRC患者的治疗效果。
将2001 - 2008年在英格兰被诊断为CRC的患者数据(n = 209968)与NCRN CRC研究的入组数据(n = 30998)相链接。医院信托机构按每年介入性研究的患者入组比例进行分类。多变量模型研究了术后30天死亡率和5年生存率与研究参与水平及持续时间之间的关系。
大多数实现高参与度的信托机构是地区综合医院,其影响并不局限于癌症“卓越中心”,尽管这些中心确实做出了重大贡献。在诊断当年研究参与度高(≥16%)的信托机构接受治疗的患者,在调整病例组合和医院层面变量后,术后死亡率较低(p < 0.001),生存率提高(p < 0.001)。随着持续参与研究,效果增强,与0年的高参与度相比,≥4年的高参与度使术后死亡率降低1.5%(6.5% - 5%,p < 2.2×10),生存率提高(p < 10;5年差异:3.8%(41.0% - 44.8%))。
在医院研究参与者中,所有CRC患者的生存与参与介入性临床研究之间存在强烈的独立关联。改善在持续参与的水平和年限之前出现,并随其增加。