In Vitro Toxicology Group, Institute of Life Science, Swansea Univeristy Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK.
Faculty of Health Sciences and Life Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019 Feb 13;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12989-019-0291-7.
It is well established that toxicological evaluation of engineered nanomaterials (NMs) is vital to ensure the health and safety of those exposed to them. Further, there is a distinct need for the development of advanced physiologically relevant in vitro techniques for NM hazard prediction due to the limited predictive power of current in vitro models and the unsustainability of conducting nano-safety evaluations in vivo. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop alternative in vitro approaches to assess the potential of NMs to induce genotoxicity by secondary mechanisms.
This was first undertaken by a conditioned media-based technique, whereby cell culture media was transferred from differentiated THP-1 (dTHP-1) macrophages treated with γ-FeO or FeO superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) to the bronchial cell line 16HBE14o. Secondly construction and SPION treatment of a co-culture model comprising of 16HBE14o cells and dTHP-1 macrophages. For both of these approaches no cytotoxicity was detected and chromosomal damage was evaluated by the in vitro micronucleus assay. Genotoxicity assessment was also performed using 16HBE14o monocultures, which demonstrated only γ-FeO nanoparticles to be capable of inducing chromosomal damage. In contrast, immune cell conditioned media and dual cell co-culture SPION treatments showed both SPION types to be genotoxic to 16HBE14o cells due to secondary genotoxicity promoted by SPION-immune cell interaction.
The findings of the present study demonstrate that the approach of using single in vitro cell test systems precludes the ability to consider secondary genotoxic mechanisms. Consequently, the use of multi-cell type models is preferable as they better mimic the in vivo environment and thus offer the potential to enhance understanding and detection of a wider breadth of potential damage induced by NMs.
众所周知,对工程纳米材料(NMs)进行毒理学评价对于确保接触它们的人员的健康和安全至关重要。此外,由于当前体外模型的预测能力有限,以及在体内进行纳米安全性评估的不可持续性,因此迫切需要开发先进的、具有生理相关性的体外技术来预测 NM 危害。因此,本研究的目的是开发替代的体外方法来评估 NM 通过次级机制诱导遗传毒性的潜力。
首先通过基于条件培养基的技术来实现,即将经 γ-FeO 或 FeO 超顺磁性氧化铁纳米粒子(SPION)处理的分化 THP-1(dTHP-1)巨噬细胞的细胞培养物转移到支气管细胞系 16HBE14o 中。其次构建并处理包含 16HBE14o 细胞和 dTHP-1 巨噬细胞的共培养模型。对于这两种方法,均未检测到细胞毒性,并用体外微核试验评估染色体损伤。还使用 16HBE14o 单细胞培养物进行了遗传毒性评估,结果表明只有 γ-FeO 纳米粒子能够诱导染色体损伤。相比之下,免疫细胞条件培养基和双细胞共培养 SPION 处理均显示两种 SPION 类型均对 16HBE14o 细胞具有遗传毒性,这是由于 SPION-免疫细胞相互作用促进的次级遗传毒性所致。
本研究的结果表明,使用单一体外细胞测试系统的方法排除了考虑次级遗传毒性机制的能力。因此,使用多细胞类型模型更为可取,因为它们更能模拟体内环境,从而有潜力增强对 NM 诱导的更广泛潜在损伤的理解和检测。