• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去半个世纪中,蚜虫、蝴蝶、飞蛾和鸟类物候的时空和栖息地变化。

Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.

机构信息

Rothamsted Insect Survey, Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):1982-1994. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14592. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.14592
PMID:30761691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6563090/
Abstract

Global warming has advanced the timing of biological events, potentially leading to disruption across trophic levels. The potential importance of phenological change as a driver of population trends has been suggested. To fully understand the possible impacts, there is a need to quantify the scale of these changes spatially and according to habitat type. We studied the relationship between phenological trends, space and habitat type between 1965 and 2012 using an extensive UK dataset comprising 269 aphid, bird, butterfly and moth species. We modelled phenologies using generalized additive mixed models that included covariates for geographical (latitude, longitude, altitude), temporal (year, season) and habitat terms (woodland, scrub, grassland). Model selection showed that a baseline model with geographical and temporal components explained the variation in phenologies better than either a model in which space and time interacted or a habitat model without spatial terms. This baseline model showed strongly that phenologies shifted progressively earlier over time, that increasing altitude produced later phenologies and that a strong spatial component determined phenological timings, particularly latitude. The seasonal timing of a phenological event, in terms of whether it fell in the first or second half of the year, did not result in substantially different trends for butterflies. For moths, early season phenologies advanced more rapidly than those recorded later. Whilst temporal trends across all habitats resulted in earlier phenologies over time, agricultural habitats produced significantly later phenologies than most other habitats studied, probably because of nonclimatic drivers. A model with a significant habitat-time interaction was the best-fitting model for birds, moths and butterflies, emphasizing that the rates of phenological advance also differ among habitats for these groups. Our results suggest the presence of strong spatial gradients in mean seasonal timing and nonlinear trends towards earlier seasonal timing that varies in form and rate among habitat types.

摘要

全球变暖已经提前了生物事件的时间,可能导致营养级之间的混乱。有人认为,物候变化作为种群趋势的驱动因素具有重要意义。为了充分了解可能产生的影响,需要根据空间和栖息地类型对这些变化的规模进行量化。我们利用包含 269 种蚜虫、鸟类、蝴蝶和飞蛾物种的广泛英国数据集,研究了 1965 年至 2012 年间物候趋势、空间和栖息地类型之间的关系。我们使用广义加性混合模型来模拟物候,该模型包含地理(纬度、经度、海拔)、时间(年份、季节)和栖息地(林地、灌丛、草地)的协变量。模型选择表明,具有地理和时间成分的基线模型比空间和时间相互作用的模型或没有空间项的栖息地模型更好地解释了物候的变化。该基线模型强烈表明,物候随时间逐渐提前,海拔升高导致物候延迟,空间成分决定物候时间,特别是纬度。物候事件的季节性时间(即它是否发生在一年的上半年或下半年),对于蝴蝶来说并没有导致明显不同的趋势。对于飞蛾,早期季节的物候变化比后期记录的物候变化更快。尽管所有栖息地的时间趋势都导致物候随时间提前,但农业栖息地的物候明显比其他大多数研究的栖息地晚,可能是因为非气候驱动因素。对于鸟类、飞蛾和蝴蝶,具有显著栖息地-时间相互作用的模型是最佳拟合模型,这强调了这些物种的物候提前率在不同栖息地之间也存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,存在强烈的平均季节性时间的空间梯度,以及非线性的提前季节性时间趋势,这种趋势在形式和速度上因栖息地类型而异。

相似文献

1
Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.过去半个世纪中,蚜虫、蝴蝶、飞蛾和鸟类物候的时空和栖息地变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):1982-1994. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14592. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
2
Breakpoints in butterfly decline in Central Europe over the last century.上个世纪中欧蝴蝶数量减少的转折点。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158315. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158315. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
Consistent trait-temperature interactions drive butterfly phenology in both incidental and survey data.一致的特征-温度相互作用驱动蝴蝶物候在偶然和调查数据中。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13370. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16104-7.
4
Active around the year: Butterflies and moths adapt their life cycles to a warming world.活跃期:蝴蝶和飞蛾适应气候变化调整生命周期。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e17103. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17103.
5
Detecting mismatches of bird migration stopover and tree phenology in response to changing climate.检测鸟类迁徙中途停歇地与树木物候对气候变化响应的不匹配情况。
Oecologia. 2015 Aug;178(4):1227-38. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3293-7. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Long-term phenological trends, species accumulation rates, aphid traits and climate: five decades of change in migrating aphids.长期物候趋势、物种积累率、蚜虫特征与气候:迁徙蚜虫五十年的变化
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):21-34. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12282. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Tritrophic phenological match-mismatch in space and time.时空三营养层物候匹配失配。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun;2(6):970-975. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0543-1. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Phenological responses in a sycamore-aphid-parasitoid system and consequences for aphid population dynamics: A 20 year case study.[文章标题]:在槭树-蚜虫-寄生蜂系统中的物候反应及其对蚜虫种群动态的影响:一项长达 20 年的案例研究。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):2814-2828. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15015. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
9
Differentiating the effects of climate and land use change on European biodiversity: A scenario analysis.区分气候和土地利用变化对欧洲生物多样性的影响:情景分析
Ambio. 2017 Apr;46(3):277-290. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0840-3. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Butterfly species respond differently to climate warming and land use change in the northern Alps.蝴蝶物种对阿尔卑斯山北部的气候变暖与土地利用变化的响应存在差异。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 10;890:164268. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164268. Epub 2023 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
30 years of climate related phenological research: themes and trends.30年的气候相关物候学研究:主题与趋势
Int J Biometeorol. 2025 Jun;69(6):1459-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00484-025-02903-w. Epub 2025 May 12.
2
Modelling asynchrony in phenology considering a dynamic representation of meteorological variables.考虑气象变量动态表示的物候异步建模。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 11;13:e18653. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18653. eCollection 2025.
3
Resolving biology's dark matter: species richness, spatiotemporal distribution, and community composition of a dark taxon.

本文引用的文献

1
The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5°C rather than 2°C.将全球变暖限制在 1.5°C 而不是 2°C,对昆虫、脊椎动物和植物的预计影响。
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):791-795. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3646.
2
Tritrophic phenological match-mismatch in space and time.时空三营养层物候匹配失配。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun;2(6):970-975. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0543-1. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
The sensitivity of breeding songbirds to changes in seasonal timing is linked to population change but cannot be directly attributed to the effects of trophic asynchrony on productivity.
解析生物学的暗物质:暗类群的物种丰富度、时空分布和群落组成。
BMC Biol. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02010-z.
4
Metabarcoding dietary analysis in the insectivorous bat and implications for conservation.食虫蝙蝠的代谢条形码饮食分析及其保护意义。
Biodivers Data J. 2023 Nov 14;11:e111146. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.11.e111146. eCollection 2023.
5
From identification to forecasting: the potential of image recognition and artificial intelligence for aphid pest monitoring.从识别到预测:图像识别与人工智能在蚜虫虫害监测中的潜力
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 19;14:1150748. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1150748. eCollection 2023.
6
Species diversity, relative abundance, and distribution of avifauna in different habitats within Lewi Mountain, Awi zone, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿维地区刘易斯山不同栖息地鸟类的物种多样性、相对丰度和分布情况。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 8;9(6):e17127. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17127. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Prediction of the Current and Future Distribution of Tomato Leafminer in China Using the MaxEnt Model.利用MaxEnt模型预测番茄潜叶蛾在中国的当前和未来分布
Insects. 2023 Jun 6;14(6):531. doi: 10.3390/insects14060531.
8
The Distribution Pattern and Species Richness of Scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae).蝎蛉(长翅目:蝎蛉科)的分布模式与物种丰富度
Insects. 2023 Mar 29;14(4):332. doi: 10.3390/insects14040332.
9
rGAI: An R package for fitting the generalized abundance index to seasonal count data.rGAI:一个用于将广义丰度指数拟合到季节性计数数据的R软件包。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Aug 22;12(8):e9200. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9200. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Differences in phenology, daily timing of activity, and associations of temperature utilization with survival in three threatened butterflies.三种受威胁蝴蝶的物候差异、活动日时间安排以及与温度利用相关的生存关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10676-0.
繁殖鸣禽对季节性时间变化的敏感性与种群变化有关,但不能直接归因于营养物不同步对生产力的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):957-971. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13960. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Phenological synchrony between a butterfly and its host plants: Experimental test of effects of spring temperature.蝴蝶与其宿主植物的物候同步性:春季温度影响的实验检验。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):150-161. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12770. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
5
Migration phenology and breeding success are predicted by methylation of a photoperiodic gene in the barn swallow.迁徙物候和繁殖成功率可通过 barn swallow 中光周期基因的甲基化预测。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 31;7:45412. doi: 10.1038/srep45412.
6
Large extents of intensive land use limit community reorganization during climate warming.大面积的集约土地利用限制了气候变暖期间的群落重组。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2272-2283. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13587. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people.气候变化从基因到生物群落到人类的广泛影响。
Science. 2016 Nov 11;354(6313). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7671.
8
Interspecific variation in the relationship between clutch size, laying date and intensity of urbanization in four species of hole-nesting birds.四种洞巢鸟类的窝卵数、产卵日期与城市化强度之间关系的种间差异。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul 25;6(16):5907-20. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2335. eCollection 2016 Aug.
9
Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels.跨分类群和营养级的物候对气候的敏感性。
Nature. 2016 Jul 14;535(7611):241-5. doi: 10.1038/nature18608. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Passerines may be sufficiently plastic to track temperature-mediated shifts in optimum lay date.雀形目鸟类可能具有足够的可塑性,以跟踪受温度影响的最佳产卵日期的变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3259-72. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13302. Epub 2016 May 13.