• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波治疗网球肘的效果:一项随机对照试验系统评价方案

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave for tennis elbow: A protocol for systematic review of randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Tang Hua-Yu, Yu Tao, Wei Wei, Zhao Yu

机构信息

Second Ward of Orthopedics Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi.

Department of Orthopedics, Huludao Central Hospital, Huludao, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14517. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014517.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000014517
PMID:30762789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6408112/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical studies have reported that extracorporeal shock wave (EPSW) is an effective treatment for patients with tennis elbow (TE). However, no systematic review has assessed its effectiveness and safety for the treatment of TE.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we will search the potential eligible literature from the following electronic databases: Central, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CNKI from inception to the present. All literatures of randomized controlled trials of EPSW for TE will be considered without language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently select the studies, extract the data, and evaluate the methodology quality. All disagreements between those 2 reviewers will be resolved by a third reviewer involved through discussion. Outcome data will be pooled by RevMan 5.3 software if the heterogeneity is reasonable. Reporting bias will also be conducted if more than 10 included studies can be reached.

RESULTS

This systematic review will evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of EPSW for TE.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study will summarize the current evidence of EPSW on TE outcomes and may provide guidance for both clinical practice and further studies.

DISSEMINATION AND ETHICS

This systematic review does not need ethical approval, because it does not utilize the individual patient data. Its findings are expected to publish in peer-reviewed journals.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019119687.

摘要

背景

既往临床研究报道,体外冲击波(EPSW)是治疗网球肘(TE)患者的一种有效方法。然而,尚无系统评价评估其治疗TE的有效性和安全性。

方法

在本系统评价中,我们将检索以下电子数据库从建库至目前的潜在合格文献:Cochrane中心对照试验注册库、Embase、医学索引数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库以及中国知网。将纳入所有关于EPSW治疗TE的随机对照试验文献,无语言限制。两名评价者将独立选择研究、提取数据并评估方法学质量。这两名评价者之间的所有分歧将通过第三名评价者参与讨论来解决。如果异质性合理,结局数据将采用RevMan 5.3软件进行合并。如果纳入研究超过10项,还将进行发表偏倚分析。

结果

本系统评价将评估EPSW治疗TE 的临床有效性和安全性。

结论

本研究结果将总结目前EPSW对TE结局的证据,并可能为临床实践和进一步研究提供指导。

传播与伦理

本系统评价无需伦理批准,因为它不使用个体患者数据。其研究结果有望发表在同行评审期刊上。

系统评价注册

国际前瞻性系统评价注册库CRD42019119687。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b410/6408112/7fe9524ce143/medi-98-e14517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b410/6408112/7fe9524ce143/medi-98-e14517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b410/6408112/7fe9524ce143/medi-98-e14517-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of extracorporeal shock wave for tennis elbow: A protocol for systematic review of randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗网球肘的效果:一项随机对照试验系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14517. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014517.
2
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave for low back pain: A protocol of systematic review.体外冲击波治疗腰痛的有效性:一项系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14511. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014511.
3
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave monotherapy for avascular necrosis of femoral head: A systematic review protocol of randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波单一疗法治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e15119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015119.
4
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for frozen shoulder: A protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗肩周炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验系统评价的方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14506. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014506.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave combined spinal core decompression for the treatment of patients with femoral head necrosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波联合脊柱核心减压治疗股骨头坏死患者的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 22;99(21):e20350. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020350.
7
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.体外冲击波治疗中风后肩手综合征的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20664. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020664.
8
Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for rotator cuff injury: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗肩袖损伤的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0301820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301820. eCollection 2024.
9
A comparative study of the efficacy of ultrasonics and extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of tennis elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声与体外冲击波治疗网球肘疗效的比较研究:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 6;14(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1290-y.
10
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection for Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.体外冲击波疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2598-2607. doi: 10.1111/os.14212. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term Efficacy Comparison of High-intensity and Low-intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study.高强度与低强度激光疗法治疗外侧上髁炎的短期疗效比较:一项随机双盲临床研究
Arch Rheumatol. 2019 Apr 24;35(1):60-67. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2020.7347. eCollection 2020 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Tennis Elbow Surgery: Open Versus Arthroscopic Versus Percutaneous Release of the Common Extensor Origin.网球肘手术的系统评价:开放手术、关节镜手术与经皮伸肌总腱起点松解术的比较
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jun;33(6):1260-1268.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.042. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
Comparison of corticosteroid, autologous blood or sclerosant injections for chronic tennis elbow.皮质类固醇、自体血或硬化剂注射治疗慢性网球肘的比较
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jun;20(6):528-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
3
A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial on the efficacy of arthroscopic tennis elbow release for the management of chronic lateral epicondylitis.
一项关于关节镜下网球肘松解术治疗慢性外侧上髁炎疗效的随机、双盲、假手术对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 1;17:239. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1093-9.
4
Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus ultrasound therapy in chronic tennis elbow.体外冲击波疗法与超声疗法对慢性网球肘的镇痛效果比较
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Aug;27(8):2563-7. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2563. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
6
Management of tennis elbow with topical glyceryl trinitrate.硝酸甘油局部用药治疗网球肘
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(2):175-80. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.3123.
7
Acupuncture for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow): study protocol for a randomized, practitioner-assessor blinded, controlled pilot clinical trial.针刺治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎(网球肘):一项随机、医师评估盲法、对照的临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Jun 14;14:174. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-174.
8
Evaluation and management of elbow tendinopathy.肘肌腱病的评估与管理。
Sports Health. 2012 Sep;4(5):384-93. doi: 10.1177/1941738112454651.
9
A randomized controlled trial of exercise versus wait-list in chronic tennis elbow (lateral epicondylosis).一项针对慢性网球肘(外侧上髁炎)的运动与等待名单对照的随机对照试验。
Ups J Med Sci. 2011 Nov;116(4):269-79. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2011.600476.
10
Tennis elbow.网球肘
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jun 27;2011:1117.