Suppr超能文献

糖尿病对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者心室结构、动脉僵硬度和脉动血流动力学的影响。

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Ventricular Structure, Arterial Stiffness, and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

1 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.

2 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia PA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e011457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011457.

Abstract

Background Heterogeneity in the underlying processes that contribute to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction ( HF p EF ) is increasingly recognized. Diabetes mellitus is a frequent comorbidity in HF p EF , but its impact on left ventricular and arterial structure and function in HF p EF is unknown. Methods and Results We assessed the impact of diabetes mellitus on left ventricular cellular and interstitial hypertrophy (assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, including T1 mapping pregadolinium and postgadolinium administration), arterial stiffness (assessed with arterial tonometry), and pulsatile arterial hemodynamics (assessed with in-office pressure-flow analyses and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring) among 53 subjects with HF p EF (32 diabetic and 21 nondiabetic subjects). Despite few differences in clinical characteristics, diabetic subjects with HFpEF exhibited a markedly greater left ventricular mass index (78.1 [95% CI , 70.4-85.9] g versus 63.6 [95% CI , 55.8-71.3] g; P=0.0093) and indexed extracellular volume (23.6 [95% CI , 21.2-26.1] mL/m versus 16.2 [95% CI , 13.1-19.4] mL/m; P=0.0008). Pronounced aortic stiffening was also observed in the diabetic group (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, 11.86 [95% CI , 10.4-13.1] m/s versus 8.8 [95% CI , 7.5-10.1] m/s; P=0.0027), with an adverse pulsatile hemodynamic profile characterized by increased oscillatory power (315 [95% CI , 258-373] mW versus 190 [95% CI , 144-236] mW; P=0.0007), aortic characteristic impedance (0.154 [95% CI , 0.124-0.183] mm Hg/mL per second versus 0.096 [95% CI , 0.072-0.121] mm Hg/mL per second; P=0.0024), and forward (59.5 [95% CI , 52.8-66.1] mm Hg versus 40.1 [95% CI , 31.6-48.6] mm Hg; P=0.0010) and backward (19.6 [95% CI , 16.2-22.9] mm Hg versus 14.1 [95% CI , 10.9-17.3] mm Hg; P=0.0169) wave amplitude. Abnormal pulsatile hemodynamics were also evident in 24-hour ambulatory monitoring, despite the absence of significant differences in 24-hour systolic blood pressure between the groups. Conclusions Diabetes mellitus is a key determinant of left ventricular remodeling, arterial stiffness, adverse pulsatile hemodynamics, and ventricular-arterial interactions in HF p EF . Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01516346.

摘要

背景

射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)的潜在发病机制存在异质性,这一点日益受到重视。糖尿病是 HFpEF 的常见合并症,但它对 HFpEF 患者的左心室和动脉结构与功能的影响尚不清楚。

方法和结果

我们评估了糖尿病对 HFpEF 患者左心室细胞和间质肥大(采用心脏磁共振成像评估,包括钆增强前后的 T1 映射)、动脉僵硬度(采用动脉张力测定法评估)和脉动性动脉血流动力学(采用诊室压力-流量分析和 24 小时动态监测评估)的影响,共纳入 53 例 HFpEF 患者(32 例糖尿病患者和 21 例非糖尿病患者)。尽管临床特征差异不大,但 HFpEF 合并糖尿病患者的左心室质量指数明显更高(78.1 [95%置信区间,70.4-85.9] g 比 63.6 [95%置信区间,55.8-71.3] g;P=0.0093),细胞外容积指数也明显更高(23.6 [95%置信区间,21.2-26.1] mL/m 比 16.2 [95%置信区间,13.1-19.4] mL/m;P=0.0008)。糖尿病组也观察到明显的主动脉僵硬度增加(颈股脉搏波速度,11.86 [95%置信区间,10.4-13.1] m/s 比 8.8 [95%置信区间,7.5-10.1] m/s;P=0.0027),伴有脉动血流动力学特征恶化,表现为振荡功率增加(315 [95%置信区间,258-373] mW 比 190 [95%置信区间,144-236] mW;P=0.0007)、主动脉特征阻抗增加(0.154 [95%置信区间,0.124-0.183] mm Hg/mL/s 比 0.096 [95%置信区间,0.072-0.121] mm Hg/mL/s;P=0.0024)、正向波幅度增加(59.5 [95%置信区间,52.8-66.1] mm Hg 比 40.1 [95%置信区间,31.6-48.6] mm Hg;P=0.0010)和反向波幅度增加(19.6 [95%置信区间,16.2-22.9] mm Hg 比 14.1 [95%置信区间,10.9-17.3] mm Hg;P=0.0169)。尽管两组 24 小时收缩压无显著差异,但在 24 小时动态监测中也可观察到异常的脉动血流动力学。

结论

糖尿病是 HFpEF 患者左心室重构、动脉僵硬度、不良脉动血流动力学和心室-动脉相互作用的关键决定因素。

临床试验注册网址

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT 01516346。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fdc/6405670/1d798fc2f413/JAH3-8-e011457-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验