Evaluation of the effect of different surface conditioning methods on shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to aged composite restorations.

INTRODUCTION

There are controversies regarding the most reliable conditioning method of the aged composite surface to ensure optimum bond strength. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of metal brackets to microhybrid composite restorations after different surface preparation techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of sixty microhybrid composite samples were prepared using upper right central incisor celluloid crown as a mold. Samples were treated with 4 different surface conditioning methods: (1) etching, (2) sandblasting, (3) grinding, and (4) CO laser irradiation. Samples were then bonded with metal brackets and underwent shear bond strength testing. A scanning electron microscope was carried out and the data was analysed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. Bond failure was examined by stereomicroscope and scored based on adhesive remnant index (ARI). Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare ARI values (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Shear bond strength values in the sandblasting group (17.18±1.53MPa) were significantly higher than the other groups. There was no significant difference between the grinding (12.87±3.38MPa) and laser (11.08±1.37MPa) groups (P=0.09). The lowest values were recorded in the etching group (6.78±1.69MPa). There was a significant difference in ARI scores among the four groups (P<0.001). ARI scores were mostly 2 and 3 in the sandblasting and grinding group, while in the etching and laser groups ARI was mostly 0 and 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface preparation by sandblasting and CO laser provides clinically acceptable results with regards to bond strength and ARI score, however grinding and acid etching failed to produce the same results.