Effect of different surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns.

INTRODUCTION

The number of adult patients seeking orthodontic treatment has been consistently increasing. Since the placing of the final restoration must be postponed until the completion of the orthodontic treatment, provisional restoration is recommended for the duration of the orthodontic treatment. These surfaces have special chemical properties, which necessitate the orthodontists to prepare the bonding area with special measures.

METHODS

Polycarbonate and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) crowns (n=80) were randomly subdivided into 4 groups. Conditioning methods were grinding, sandblasting, CO laser and methyl methacrylate application. Samples underwent SBS testing. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was carried out. The data was analysed with ANOVA, Student t-test and Post-hoc test. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) was analysed with Chi test.

RESULTS

In all surface treatments, the mean Shear Bond Strength (SBS) of PMMA was significantly higher than that of polycarbonate (P<0.001). In the polycarbonate groups, there was a significant difference between the mean SBS of the four treatment methods (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in PMMA group (P=0.076). In both crown materials, the mode of the failure was adhesive type, regardless of the conditioning method (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PMMAs rendered higher bond strength than polycarbonates. In PMMA, all the surface treatment methods resulted in acceptable bond strength. However, if bonding the brackets to polycarbonate crown is needed, other conditioning methods are preferred over CO laser.