School of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Endocrinology and Nephrology Unit, CHU of Quebec-Laval University Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
School of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Jun;51(6):677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
To examine the associations between intuitive eating and trimester-specific gestational weight gain (GWG), and between intuitive eating and diet quality at each trimester.
At each trimester, participants completed the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 and 3 24-hour recalls from which the Healthy Eating Index was calculated. Trimester-specific GWG was calculated with interpolated weights.
A total of 79 pregnant women.
Intuitive eating, GWG, and diet quality.
One-way ANOVA was used to compare intuitive eating scores between GWG groups. Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess the association between the intuitive eating score and the Healthy Eating Index score.
In the first trimester, women within GWG recommendations had a higher total intuitive eating score compared with women above recommendations (3.9 ± 0.5 vs 3.6 ± 0.6; P = .04). The unconditional permission to eat subscale was associated with lower diet quality in the first trimester (r = -.26; P = .02) whereas the body-food choice congruence subscale was associated with better diet quality in the second and third trimesters (r = .26, P = .02 and r = .27, P = .01, respectively).
The researchers found an association between higher levels of intuitive eating and adequate first-trimester GWG. Further research might investigate whether promoting intuitive eating among pregnant women favors healthy GWG.
研究直觉饮食与妊娠特定阶段体重增加(GWG)之间的关系,以及直觉饮食与每个妊娠阶段饮食质量之间的关系。
在每个妊娠阶段,参与者完成了直觉饮食量表-2 和 3 次 24 小时回忆,从中计算出健康饮食指数。使用插值体重计算特定妊娠阶段的 GWG。
共有 79 名孕妇。
直觉饮食、GWG 和饮食质量。
采用单向方差分析比较 GWG 组之间的直觉饮食评分。采用皮尔逊相关分析评估直觉饮食评分与健康饮食指数评分之间的相关性。
在孕早期,符合 GWG 建议的女性的总体直觉饮食评分高于建议以上的女性(3.9±0.5 与 3.6±0.6;P=0.04)。无条件允许进食子量表与孕早期饮食质量较差相关(r=-0.26;P=0.02),而身体-食物选择一致性子量表与孕中期和孕晚期饮食质量较好相关(r=-0.26,P=0.02 和 r=-0.27,P=0.01)。
研究人员发现,较高水平的直觉饮食与孕早期适当的 GWG 之间存在关联。进一步的研究可能会调查在孕妇中促进直觉饮食是否有利于健康的 GWG。