Martin Kelly, Radler Diane Rigassio, Sackey Joachim, Zhang Cuilin, Shrestha Kusum, Shrestha Abha, Shrestha Archana, Barrett Emily S, Rawal Shristi
Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, 65 Bergen Street. Room 157, Newark, NJ, 07107, USA.
Department of Human Ecology, SUNY Oneonta, Oneonta, NY, USA.
BMC Nutr. 2022 Nov 11;8(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40795-022-00623-7.
Despite promising data from high-income countries, the impact of diet quality on gestational weight gain (GWG) has not been investigated in the context of many low-income countries including Nepal.
We prospectively examined the association between 1 trimester diet quality and GWG rate among a cohort of singleton pregnant women (n = 101; age 25.9 ± 4.1 years) from a community-based periurban hospital in Dhulikhel, Nepal. Diet quality was assessed from the adapted Nepali version of the 21-item PrimeScreen questionnaire in the 1 trimester. The diet quality score is based on consumption frequency of 21 food group components (score ranging 0-42), categorized as healthy (12 groups) versus unhealthy (9 groups), with higher scores indicative of better overall diet quality. The GWG rate was calculated as the measured weight at early-to-mid 3 trimester (28-35 wks) minus the weight at 2 trimester (13-25 wks), divided by the number of weeks in between. Linear regression estimated the association between diet quality and GWG rate, adjusting for a priori covariates (i.e. age, education, ethnicity, pre-pregnancy BMI, and nausea/vomiting.) RESULTS: The mean GWG rate in mid-to-late pregnancy was 0.46 ± 0.2 kg/wk and the mean diet quality score was 23.6 ± 2.5. Based on pre-pregnancy BMI, 49.4% of women had excessive GWG rate, while nearly equal numbers had either adequate GWG or inadequate GWG rate. There was no significant association between diet quality and GWG rate [adjusted β (95% CI) = -0.02 (-0.05, 0.01); p = 0.14]. The mean GWG rate was marginally higher (0.57 vs. 0.44 kg/wk; p = 0.06) among those with high versus low (2 + servings vs. 0-1 serving/wk) intake of red meat; similar findings were seen when comparing red meat intake between women with excessive versus adequate GWG (Cramer's V = 0.2; p = 0.06).
While 1 trimester diet quality is not related to GWG among Nepali women, a high intake of red meat may be a potential risk factor for excessive GWG in this population.
尽管高收入国家有令人鼓舞的数据,但在包括尼泊尔在内的许多低收入国家,饮食质量对孕期体重增加(GWG)的影响尚未得到研究。
我们前瞻性地研究了尼泊尔杜利凯尔一家城郊社区医院的单胎孕妇队列(n = 101;年龄25.9±4.1岁)中孕早期饮食质量与GWG率之间的关联。在孕早期,通过改编后的尼泊尔语版21项PrimeScreen问卷评估饮食质量。饮食质量得分基于21种食物组成分的消费频率(得分范围0 - 42),分为健康组(12组)和不健康组(9组),得分越高表明总体饮食质量越好。GWG率的计算方法是孕晚期早期至中期(28 - 35周)测得的体重减去孕中期(13 - 25周)的体重,再除以两者之间的周数。线性回归估计了饮食质量与GWG率之间的关联,并对先验协变量(即年龄、教育程度、种族、孕前BMI和恶心/呕吐)进行了调整。结果:妊娠中后期的平均GWG率为0.46±0.2kg/周,平均饮食质量得分为23.6±2.5。根据孕前BMI,49.4%的女性GWG率过高,而GWG率充足或不足的女性数量几乎相等。饮食质量与GWG率之间无显著关联[调整后的β(95%CI)= -0.02(-0.05,0.01);p = 0.14]。红肉摄入量高(每周2份及以上)与低(每周0 - 1份)的人群相比,平均GWG率略高(0.57对0.44kg/周;p = 0.06);在比较GWG率过高与充足的女性之间的红肉摄入量时也有类似发现(克莱默V = 0.2;p = 0.06)。
虽然尼泊尔女性孕早期的饮食质量与GWG无关,但红肉的高摄入量可能是该人群GWG过高的一个潜在风险因素。