• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊与创伤护理环境中照顾者的心理社会问题与心理困扰

Caregiver's Psychosocial Concerns and Psychological Distress in Emergency and Trauma Care Setting.

作者信息

Kanmani T R, Raju Birudu

机构信息

Department of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):54-59. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_129_18.

DOI:10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_129_18
PMID:30765971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6337970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) will be the third largest killer by the year 2020 in the world. It creates the great amount of morbidity, disability, mortality, and reduces the psychosocial well-being of the patients and their caregivers. Hence, the current paper aimed to explore the psychosocial distress and caregivers' concerns in emergency and trauma care (ETC) setting.

METHODOLOGY

This study adopted qualitative research design. All caregivers of TBI survivors were considered as a universe of the study. A total of 50 caregivers were recruited, and the predesigned questionnaire was administered. Depression, anxiety, stress scale was used to identify the caregivers' depression, stress, and anxiety. The simple thematic analysis was used to derive the themes from the verbatim data. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS South Asia Pvt. Ltd, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India).

RESULTS

In the quantitative analysis, caregivers' mean age was found to be 45 (mean = 45.00 ± 13.83) years. Caregivers had experienced mild depression (13.36 ± 3.07), moderate anxiety (13.70 ± 3.03), and minimum stress (13.66 ± 2.98) levels. Qualitative results identified the following themes: difficulty in accessing timely care, uncertainty about the prognosis and future, family concerns and financial constraints, personal feelings and personal needs, and supportive care. Chi-square test revealed that there was no significant association between gender and depression (χ = 2.381 < 0.12), anxiety (χ = 0.01 < 0.92), and stress (χ = 0.235 < 0.61) levels of caregivers.

CONCLUSION

To accomplish, providing psychosocial care in ETC setting, the role of psychiatric social workers is pivotal.

摘要

背景

到2020年,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)将成为全球第三大杀手。它造成了大量的发病、残疾和死亡,并降低了患者及其护理人员的心理社会幸福感。因此,本文旨在探讨急诊与创伤护理(ETC)环境中的心理社会困扰及护理人员的担忧。

方法

本研究采用定性研究设计。所有TBI幸存者的护理人员被视为研究总体。共招募了50名护理人员,并发放了预先设计的问卷。使用抑郁、焦虑、压力量表来识别护理人员的抑郁、压力和焦虑情况。采用简单的主题分析法从逐字记录的数据中提炼主题。数据使用SPSS 21.0版本(SPSS南亚私人有限公司,印度卡纳塔克邦班加罗尔)进行分析。

结果

在定量分析中,护理人员的平均年龄为45岁(均值 = 45.00 ± 13.83)。护理人员经历了轻度抑郁(13.36 ± 3.07)、中度焦虑(13.70 ± 3.03)和最低压力水平(13.66 ± 2.98)。定性结果确定了以下主题:难以获得及时护理、预后和未来的不确定性、家庭担忧和经济限制、个人感受和个人需求以及支持性护理。卡方检验显示,护理人员的性别与抑郁(χ = 2.381 < 0.12)、焦虑(χ = 0.01 < 0.92)和压力(χ = 0.235 < 0.61)水平之间无显著关联。

结论

为了在ETC环境中提供心理社会护理,精神科社会工作者的作用至关重要。

相似文献

1
Caregiver's Psychosocial Concerns and Psychological Distress in Emergency and Trauma Care Setting.急诊与创伤护理环境中照顾者的心理社会问题与心理困扰
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):54-59. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_129_18.
2
Tailor-Made Psychosocial Intervention for the Caregivers in Emergency and Trauma Care Center.为急诊与创伤护理中心的护理人员量身定制的心理社会干预措施。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2021 Apr;12(2):290-294. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722815. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Burden and Psychological Distress of Intensive Care Unit Caregivers of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.创伤性脑损伤患者重症监护室照顾者的负担与心理困扰
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 May;23(5):220-223. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23164.
4
Clinically providing psycho-social care for caregivers in emergency and trauma care setting: Scope for medical and psychiatric social workers.在急诊和创伤护理环境中为照护者提供临床心理社会护理:医学和精神科社会工作者的作用范围
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec;6(4):206-210. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.195452.
5
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
6
Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression, and Perceived Stress Among Family Caregivers of Patients Diagnosed With Oral Cancer in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study.印度中部一家三级护理医院中口腔癌患者家庭照顾者的焦虑、抑郁和感知压力患病率:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2023 Oct 16;15(10):e47100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47100. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Caregivers' responses to pain in their children in the emergency department.急诊科护理人员对其子女疼痛的应对方式。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jun;161(6):578-82. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.6.578.
9
Some things change, some things stay the same: a longitudinal analysis of cancer caregivers' unmet supportive care needs.有些事情变了,有些事情没变:癌症照顾者未满足的支持性护理需求的纵向分析。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1557-64. doi: 10.1002/pon.3166. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Health care utilization and needs after pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤后的医疗保健利用情况与需求
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e663-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1892. Epub 2006 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Support for Family Members of Brain Injury Patients in the Acute Phase of Hospital Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.赋能支持脑损伤患者家属在医院急性期照护中的作用:一项混合方法系统评价。
J Fam Nurs. 2024 Feb;30(1):50-67. doi: 10.1177/10748407231171933. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
Prehospital Impact on Family Members of Road Traffic Accident.院前急救对道路交通事故家庭成员的影响。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2021 Apr;12(2):350-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723063. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of quantitative research on traumatic brain injury in India.印度创伤性脑损伤的定量研究系统评价。
Neurol India. 2017 Mar-Apr;65(2):305-314. doi: 10.4103/neuroindia.NI_719_16.
2
Quantitative research on traumatic brain injury in India: The travails and the new optimism.印度创伤性脑损伤的定量研究:艰难困苦与新的乐观态度。
Neurol India. 2017 Mar-Apr;65(2):261-262. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.201852.
3
Clinically providing psycho-social care for caregivers in emergency and trauma care setting: Scope for medical and psychiatric social workers.在急诊和创伤护理环境中为照护者提供临床心理社会护理:医学和精神科社会工作者的作用范围
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec;6(4):206-210. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.195452.
4
Traumatic brain injury: Does gender influence outcomes?创伤性脑损伤:性别会影响预后吗?
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;6(2):70-3. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.183024.
5
Application of Mixed Method Approach in Public Health Research.混合方法在公共卫生研究中的应用。
Indian J Community Med. 2016 Apr-Jun;41(2):93-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.173495.
6
Providing effective trauma care: the potential for service provider views to enhance the quality of care (qualitative study nested within a multicentre longitudinal quantitative study).提供有效的创伤护理:服务提供者的观点对提高护理质量的潜力(嵌套在多中心纵向定量研究中的定性研究)
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 8;4(7):e005668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005668.
7
Patient expectations and the paradigm shift of care in emergency medicine.患者期望与急诊医学护理模式的转变。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Apr;4(2):163-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.82199.
8
Experiences of care: perspectives of carers of adults with traumatic brain injury.护理经历:创伤性脑损伤成年患者护理者的观点
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Jun;13(3):218-26. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.549240.
9
Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的结果指标。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;113(6):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
10
Caregiver functioning following early childhood TBI: do moms and dads respond differently?婴幼儿期创伤性脑损伤后照顾者的功能:父母的反应是否不同?
NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(1):63-72. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2010-0581.