• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放手术修补十二指肠溃疡穿孔:单中心经验

Laparoscopic and open repair for perforated duodenal ulcer: single-center experience.

作者信息

Stepanyan Suren Agho, Petrosyan Areg Artak, Safaryan Hayk Hovhannes, Yeghiazaryan Hayk Henrik, Aleksanyan Andranik Yuri, Hakobyan Vahe Mkrtich, Papazyan Karen Tigran, Mkrtchyan Mkrtich Hamlet

机构信息

Department of Surgery 1, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Jan;14(1):60-69. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76281. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2018.76281
PMID:30766630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6372872/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Perforation is a dangerous complication of peptic ulcer disease and requires emergency surgical treatment. In recent decades laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation has been widely used in emergency abdominal surgery.

AIM

To analyze laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of 120 consecutive patients with perforated duodenal ulcer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included a group of 120 consecutive patients, operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer in a single institution. Laparoscopic or open repair with or without an omental patch was performed. The value of the Boey score was investigated in predicting the outcomes of treatment in the entire study group.

RESULTS

In 61 (50.8%) cases open repair was performed, in 56 (46.7%) cases laparoscopic repair, and in 3 (2.5%) cases conversion was performed. In the laparoscopy group the mean hospital stay was 5 days (range: 3-14), in the open group 11.7 days (range: 6-63), and in the conversion group 9.3 days (8-10) (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference between characteristics of patients in the laparoscopic groups: in the second period of laparoscopic procedures (2014-2017) the duration of the operation was significantly shorter and the number of postoperative complications was significantly lower than in the initial study group (2010-2013).

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach is an effective method for treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer in selected cases. A number of 20-25 cases for the surgeon operating with the laparoscopic method is sufficient to achieve an acceptable level of expertise. More prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer.

摘要

引言

穿孔是消化性溃疡疾病的一种危险并发症,需要紧急手术治疗。近几十年来,十二指肠穿孔的腹腔镜修补术已在急诊腹部手术中广泛应用。

目的

分析120例连续性十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者的腹腔镜手术和开放手术治疗情况。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了在单一机构接受十二指肠溃疡穿孔手术的120例连续性患者。采用有或无网膜补片的腹腔镜或开放修补术。研究了Boey评分在预测整个研究组治疗结果中的价值。

结果

61例(50.8%)采用开放修补术,56例(46.7%)采用腹腔镜修补术,3例(2.5%)进行了中转手术。腹腔镜组平均住院时间为5天(范围:3 - 14天),开放组为11.7天(范围:6 - 63天),中转组为9.3天(8 - 10天)(p < 0.001)。腹腔镜组患者特征存在显著差异:在腹腔镜手术的第二阶段(2014 - 2017年),手术时间明显缩短,术后并发症数量明显低于初始研究组(2010 - 2013年)。

结论

腹腔镜手术方法是治疗部分十二指肠溃疡穿孔病例的有效方法。对于采用腹腔镜方法手术的外科医生来说,20 - 25例病例足以达到可接受的专业水平。需要更多前瞻性随机研究来评估十二指肠溃疡穿孔腹腔镜修补术的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb0/6372872/4016899ebbca/WIITM-14-32987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb0/6372872/6993e01c21ef/WIITM-14-32987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb0/6372872/4016899ebbca/WIITM-14-32987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb0/6372872/6993e01c21ef/WIITM-14-32987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb0/6372872/4016899ebbca/WIITM-14-32987-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic and open repair for perforated duodenal ulcer: single-center experience.腹腔镜与开放手术修补十二指肠溃疡穿孔:单中心经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Jan;14(1):60-69. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76281. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
[The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcers].[腹腔镜检查在胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔治疗中的作用]
Magy Seb. 2020 Dec 12;73(4):140-147. doi: 10.1556/1046.73.2020.4.2.
3
Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair.无网膜补片的腹腔镜下消化性溃疡穿孔修补术与传统开放修补术的对比
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Oct;17(5):615-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0195.
4
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):313-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
5
Risk factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic simple closure in perforated duodenal ulcer.与腹腔镜单纯缝合术治疗穿孔性十二指肠溃疡中转开腹相关的危险因素。
Int J Surg. 2015 Mar;15:40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.028. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
6
Primary laparoscopic approach to repair perforated peptic ulcer. A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡:一项回顾性队列研究。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Dec;75(6):436-441. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08287-5. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers.单孔腹腔镜修补穿孔性十二指肠溃疡。
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1425-1430. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05352-w.
8
Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer - single centre experience.十二指肠溃疡穿孔外科治疗模式的变化——单中心经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Sep;10(3):430-6. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54057. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
9
Laparoscopic suture repair of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer for patients without risk factors.对无危险因素患者行腹腔镜十二指肠消化性溃疡穿孔缝合修补术。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2008 Nov-Dec;103(6):629-33.
10
Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer.腹腔镜网膜补片修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔
Ann Surg. 1995 Mar;221(3):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199503000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study on laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for perforated peptic ulcer repair: efficacy and outcomes analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的比较研究:疗效与结局分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 14;408(1):435. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03171-1.
2
Experience of management of pediatric upper gastrointestinal perforations: a series of 30 cases.小儿上消化道穿孔的管理经验:30例系列报道
Front Pediatr. 2023 Oct 11;11:1261336. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1261336. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic pyloroplasty for perforated peptic ulcer.腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):311-314. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68537. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Laparoscopic and Open Surgical Treatment in Gastroduodenal Perforations: Our Experience.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胃十二指肠穿孔:我们的经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Apr;27(2):113-115. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000376.
3
Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.
腹腔镜修补中小尺寸中线腹疝时桥接与补片增强的效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):382-388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4984-9. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
4
Risk factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic simple closure in perforated duodenal ulcer.与腹腔镜单纯缝合术治疗穿孔性十二指肠溃疡中转开腹相关的危险因素。
Int J Surg. 2015 Mar;15:40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.028. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
5
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results.腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡:单中心研究结果
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2302-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3481-2. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
6
Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.提高穿孔性消化性溃疡急诊手术效果的策略。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(1):e51-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9368. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
7
Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术修复穿孔性胃十二指肠溃疡:国家手术质量改进计划分析。
Am J Surg. 2013 Dec;206(6):957-62; discussion 962-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
8
Therapeutic management of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcer: literature review.穿孔性胃十二指肠溃疡的治疗管理:文献综述。
J Visc Surg. 2013 Nov;150(5):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
9
[Gastric and duodenal perforations: what is the role of laparoscopic surgery?].[胃十二指肠穿孔:腹腔镜手术的作用是什么?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2014 Feb;139(1):72-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328344. Epub 2013 May 21.
10
Outcome of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers.腹腔镜修补穿孔性十二指肠溃疡的结果。
Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):216-9. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013076.