• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

詹姆斯·林德倡议:2003年至2018年用于促进对治疗主张进行批判性思考的书籍、网站和数据库

The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018.

作者信息

Chalmers Iain, Atkinson Patricia, Badenoch Douglas, Glasziou Paul, Austvoll-Dahlgren Astrid, Oxman Andy, Clarke Mike

机构信息

James Lind Initiative, Oxford, OX2 7LG UK.

Minervation Ltd, The Wheelhouse, First Floor, Angel Court, 81 St Clements Street Oxford, England, OX4 1AW UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 4;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0138-2. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-019-0138-2
PMID:30766728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6360692/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The James Lind Initiative (JLI) was a work programme inaugurated by Iain Chalmers and Patricia Atkinson to press for better research for better health care. It ran between 2003 and 2018, when Iain Chalmers retired. During the 15 years of its existence, the JLI developed three strands of work in collaboration with the authors of this paper, and with others.

WORK THEMES

The first work strand involved developing a process for use by patients, carers and clinicians to identify shared priorities for research - the James Lind Alliance. The second strand was a series of articles, meetings, prizes and other developments to raise awareness of the massive amounts of avoidable waste in research, and of ways of reducing it. The third strand involved using a variety of approaches to promote better public and professional understanding of the importance of research in clinical practice and public health. JLI work on the first two themes has been addressed in previously published reports. This paper summarises JLI involvement during the 15 years of its existence in giving talks, convening workshops, writing books, and creating websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims.

CONCLUSION

During its 15-year life, the James Lind Initiative worked collaboratively with others to create free teaching and learning resources to help children and adults learn how to recognise untrustworthy claims about the effects of treatments. These resources have been translated in more than twenty languages, but much more could be done to support their uptake and wider use.

摘要

背景

詹姆斯·林德倡议(JLI)是由伊恩·查尔默斯和帕特里夏·阿特金森发起的一项工作计划,旨在推动开展更好的研究以提供更好的医疗保健。该倡议在2003年至2018年伊恩·查尔默斯退休期间开展。在其存在的15年里,JLI与本文作者及其他人员合作开展了三个工作方向。

工作主题

第一个工作方向是开发一个供患者、护理人员和临床医生使用的流程,以确定研究的共同优先事项——詹姆斯·林德联盟。第二个方向是一系列文章、会议、奖项及其他活动,以提高人们对研究中大量可避免浪费的认识以及减少浪费的方法。第三个方向是采用多种方法促进公众和专业人员更好地理解研究在临床实践和公共卫生中的重要性。JLI在前两个主题上的工作已在先前发表的报告中提及。本文总结了JLI在其存在的15年里在开展讲座、举办研讨会、撰写书籍以及创建网站和数据库以促进对治疗主张的批判性思考方面所做的工作。

结论

在其15年的存续期间,詹姆斯·林德倡议与其他各方合作创建了免费的教学资源,以帮助儿童和成年人学习如何识别有关治疗效果的不可信主张。这些资源已被翻译成二十多种语言,但要支持其采用和更广泛的使用,还有很多工作要做。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/a044dea73246/40900_2019_138_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/1969841485d3/40900_2019_138_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/59c1d55f1184/40900_2019_138_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/d5c5c2ca7deb/40900_2019_138_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/d008c2e7fde4/40900_2019_138_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/694b725e20a7/40900_2019_138_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/4a1b85627ce3/40900_2019_138_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/aff26ffcbe82/40900_2019_138_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/a044dea73246/40900_2019_138_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/1969841485d3/40900_2019_138_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/59c1d55f1184/40900_2019_138_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/d5c5c2ca7deb/40900_2019_138_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/d008c2e7fde4/40900_2019_138_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/694b725e20a7/40900_2019_138_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/4a1b85627ce3/40900_2019_138_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/aff26ffcbe82/40900_2019_138_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c9/6360692/a044dea73246/40900_2019_138_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018.詹姆斯·林德倡议:2003年至2018年用于促进对治疗主张进行批判性思考的书籍、网站和数据库
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 4;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0138-2. eCollection 2019.
2
Establishing a library of resources to help people understand key concepts in assessing treatment claims-The "Critical thinking and Appraisal Resource Library" (CARL).建立一个资源库,以帮助人们理解评估治疗主张中的关键概念——“批判性思维与评估资源库”(CARL)。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0178666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178666. eCollection 2017.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance Pressure Ulcer Priority Setting Partnership.探索合作中确定卫生研究重点的挑战:对詹姆斯·林德联盟压疮重点确定合作项目所采用方法的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 2;2:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y. eCollection 2016.
5
What matters to you? Engaging with children in the James Lind Alliance Children's Cancer Priority Setting Partnership.对你来说什么重要?参与詹姆斯·林德联盟儿童癌症优先事项设定合作项目中的儿童相关工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00518-2.
6
Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis.调整詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定流程以更好地支持患者参与:来自囊性纤维化的一个例子。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 20;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0159-x. eCollection 2019.
7
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial.使用《明智医疗选择》(IHC)小学资源是否能提高乌干达五年级儿童评估有关治疗效果说法的可信度的能力:一项整群随机试验方案
Trials. 2017 May 18;18(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1958-8.
8
Overarching Priorities for Health and Care Research in the United Kingdom: A Coproduced Synthesis of James Lind Alliance 'Top 10s'.英国卫生和保健研究的首要重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟“十大”研究的联合制作综合报告。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14096. doi: 10.1111/hex.14096.
9
It takes two to tango: carers' reflections on their participation and the participation of people with dementia in the James Lind Alliance process.二人转:照顾者对其参与以及痴呆症患者对 James Lind 联盟进程参与的反思。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 14;20(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01570-3.
10
Rare musculoskeletal diseases in adults: a research priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.成人罕见肌肉骨骼疾病:与詹姆斯林德联盟的研究重点设定伙伴关系。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 May 19;15(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01398-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Voices from the clinic: a qualitative analysis of physiotherapy strategies in musculoskeletal care for knee osteoarthritis patients.诊所之声:膝关节骨关节炎患者肌肉骨骼护理中物理治疗策略的质性分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08242-y.
2
Physiotherapists' opinions, barriers, and enablers to providing evidence-based care: a mixed-methods study.物理治疗师提供基于证据的护理的意见、障碍和促成因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):1382. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08741-5.
3
Key concepts for informed health choices. 1.1: assumptions that treatments are safe or effective can be misleading.

本文引用的文献

1
Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey.卫生专业人员循证实践的核心能力:基于系统评价和德尔菲调查的共识声明。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281.
2
Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices.评估关于治疗效果的主张并做出明智治疗选择的关键概念。
F1000Res. 2018 Nov 12;7:1784. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16771.2. eCollection 2018.
3
Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.
明智的健康选择的关键概念。1.1:认为治疗是安全或有效的假设可能会产生误导。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Sep;115(9):354-359. doi: 10.1177/01410768221120491.
4
Knowledge and attitudes towards clinical trials among women with ovarian cancer: results of the ACTO study.卵巢癌患者对临床试验的认知和态度:ACTO 研究结果。
J Ovarian Res. 2022 Apr 14;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-00970-w.
知情健康决策的关键概念:帮助人们学习如何评估治疗主张并做出明智选择的框架。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):29-33. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110829.
4
Patients', clinicians' and the research communities' priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch.患者、临床医生和研究团体在治疗研究方面的优先事项:存在重大不匹配。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x. eCollection 2015.
5
Establishing a library of resources to help people understand key concepts in assessing treatment claims-The "Critical thinking and Appraisal Resource Library" (CARL).建立一个资源库,以帮助人们理解评估治疗主张中的关键概念——“批判性思维与评估资源库”(CARL)。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0178666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178666. eCollection 2017.
6
Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: a latent trait analysis of items from the 'Claim Evaluation Tools' database using Rasch modelling.衡量评估治疗效果相关声明的能力:使用拉施模型对“声明评估工具”数据库中的项目进行潜在特质分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 25;7(5):e013185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013185.
7
Effects of the Informed Health Choices podcast on the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess claims about treatment effects: a randomised controlled trial.《知情健康选择播客对乌干达小学生家长评估治疗效果主张能力的影响:一项随机对照试验》
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):389-398. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31225-4. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.知情健康选择小学干预对乌干达儿童评估治疗效果可靠性能力的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):374-388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31226-6. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the 'Claim Evaluation Tools'.衡量评估治疗效果相关声明的能力:“声明评估工具”的开发
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e013184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013184.
10
Critical thinking in healthcare and education.医疗保健与教育中的批判性思维。
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j2234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2234.