Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Chemin de l'Impératrice 1, 1292 Chambésy, Genève, Switzerland; Laboratoire de Systématique végétale et Biodiversité, University of Geneva, Chemin de l'Impératrice 1, 1292 Chambésy, Genève, Switzerland.
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Chemin de l'Impératrice 1, 1292 Chambésy, Genève, Switzerland.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019 May;134:172-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Zelkova species, trees of the elm family (Ulmaceae), are part of the Cenozoic relict flora. In western Eurasia, the genus comprises three species that are restricted to disjunct areas (Z. sicula on Sicily, Z. abelicea on Crete and Z. carpinifolia in Transcaucasia). The situation is different in East Asia, where three species (Z. serrata, Z. schneideriana and Z. sinica) have at least partly overlapping distributions. The phylogenetic and phylogeographic status of these East Asian species is still not well understood, mainly since all previous studies used almost exclusively plant material collected in botanical gardens and were based on very small numbers of individuals. Our study is the first based on 33 natural populations covering all important areas with Zelkova species in the Sino-Japanese Floristic Region. Chloroplast and microsatellite markers were used, and Bayesian analyses were run for both types of markers. East Asian Zelkova species cluster into two groups that partially overlap when comparing the two types of markers. For chloroplast markers, the two groups coincide with all Japanese, some Korean and northern Chinese Z. serrata in one group and all other individuals in the other group, regardless of whether they are attributed to Z. serrata, Z. sinica or Z. schneideriana from Korea, mainland China and Taiwan. At the nuclear level, however, the clustering clearly groups all the Z. serrata individuals together, regardless of whether they are from Japan, Korea or China, and the two other species in a second group. This complex genetic pattern in East Asian Zelkova species is most likely due to a combination of ancient diversification and speciation events and more recent hybridization during the last glacial/interglacial retractions and recolonizations. One of the surprising results of our study concerns the populations from Taiwan, which are genetically similar to Z. schneideriana. Thus, their assignation to a separate taxon (Z. tarokoensis) or to a variety of Z. serrata (Z. serrata var. tarokoensis), as currently reported in all local and national floras, might be in need of revision. Furthermore, our results indicate that the East Asian species are more closely related to Z. carpinifolia than to any other Western European species. Haplotypes of Z. sicula and Z. abelicea (Mediterranean region) as well as those of Z. sinica and Z. schneideriana (East Asia) seem to have diversified more recently. The most ancient haplotypes are found among the western Eurasian Z. carpinifolia and the East Asian Z. serrata. This result is in agreement with the carpinifolia and serrata-like morphotypes commonly found in the fossil record.
榉树属(榆科)是新生代遗迹植物的一部分,其树种为榆树。在西欧亚,该属包含 3 个种,分布在离散区域(西西里岛的 Z. sicula、克里特岛的 Z. abelicea 和外高加索的 Z. carpinifolia)。东亚的情况则不同,这里有 3 个种(Z. serrata、Z. schneideriana 和 Z. sinica),分布区域至少部分重叠。这些东亚种的系统发育和系统地理状况仍未得到很好的理解,主要是因为之前所有的研究都几乎只使用了植物园中收集的植物材料,并且基于非常少的个体。我们的研究是第一个基于 33 个自然种群的研究,涵盖了中国-日本植物区系中榉树属的所有重要分布区。我们使用了叶绿体和微卫星标记,并对这两种标记类型进行了贝叶斯分析。东亚榉树属物种聚类为两个组,当比较两种标记类型时,这两个组部分重叠。对于叶绿体标记,这两个组与一组中的所有日本、一些韩国和中国北部的 Z. serrata 以及另一组中的所有其他个体相吻合,而不管它们是属于韩国、中国大陆还是台湾的 Z. serrata、Z. sinica 还是 Z. schneideriana。然而,在核水平上,聚类清楚地将所有 Z. serrata 个体聚为一组,无论它们来自日本、韩国还是中国,而其他两个种则在第二组中。东亚榉树属复杂的遗传模式很可能是由于古老的多样化和物种形成事件以及最近在末次冰期/间冰期退缩和再殖民化期间的杂交造成的。我们研究的一个令人惊讶的结果是关于来自台湾的种群,它们在遗传上与 Z. schneideriana 相似。因此,它们被分配到一个单独的分类群(Z. tarokoensis)或一个种的变种(Z. serrata var. tarokoensis),如目前所有地方和国家植物区系所报告的那样,可能需要修订。此外,我们的结果表明,东亚种与 Z. carpinifolia 的亲缘关系比与任何其他西欧种都要密切。Z. sicula 和 Z. abelicea(地中海地区)的单倍型以及 Z. sinica 和 Z. schneideriana(东亚)的单倍型似乎最近才多样化。最古老的单倍型存在于西欧亚的 Z. carpinifolia 和东亚的 Z. serrata 中。这一结果与化石记录中常见的 carpinifolia 和 serrata 样形态类型一致。