• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对根治性手术后癌症监测中使用技术的偏好:一项横断面分析。

Patient preferences on the use of technology in cancer surveillance after curative surgery: A cross-sectional analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.

Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

出版信息

Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):782-788. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2018.12.021
PMID:30770135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6420846/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advances in communication technology have enabled new methods of delivering test results to cancer survivors. We sought to determine patient preferences regarding the use of newer technology in delivering test results during cancer surveillance.

METHODS

A single institutional, cross-sectional analysis of the preferences of adult cancer survivors regarding the means (secure digital communication versus phone call or office visit) to receive surveillance test results was undertaken.

RESULTS

Among 257 respondents, the average age was 59.1 years (SD 13.5) and 61.8% were female. Common malignancies included melanoma/sarcoma (29.5%), thyroid (25.7%), breast (22.8%), and gastrointestinal (22.0%) cancer. Although patients expressed a relative preference to receive normal surveillance results via MyChart or secure e-mail, the majority preferred abnormal imaging (87.2%) or blood results (85.9%) to be communicated by in-office appointments or phone calls irrespective of age or cancer type. Patients with a college degree or higher were more likely to prefer electronic means of communication of abnormal blood results compared with a telephone call or in-person visit (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-4.73, P < .05). In contrast, patients >65 years were more likely to express a preference for telephone or in-person communication of normal imaging results (odds ratio: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.16-3.56, P < .05) versus patients ≤65 years. Preference also varied according to malignancy type.

CONCLUSION

Although many cancer patients preferred to receive "normal" surveillance results electronically, the majority preferred receiving abnormal results via direct conversation with their provider. Shifting routine communication of normal surveillance results to technology-based applications may improve patient satisfaction and decrease health care system costs.

摘要

背景

通信技术的进步使为癌症幸存者提供检测结果的新方法成为可能。我们旨在确定癌症监测期间使用新技术传递检测结果时患者的偏好。

方法

对 257 名成年癌症幸存者对接收监测检测结果的方式(安全数字通信与电话或门诊就诊)的偏好进行了单机构、横断面分析。

结果

在 257 名受访者中,平均年龄为 59.1 岁(标准差 13.5),61.8%为女性。常见的恶性肿瘤包括黑色素瘤/肉瘤(29.5%)、甲状腺(25.7%)、乳腺(22.8%)和胃肠道(22.0%)癌症。尽管患者表示相对倾向于通过 MyChart 或安全电子邮件接收正常的监测结果,但大多数患者希望通过门诊预约或电话通知来报告异常影像学(87.2%)或血液检测结果(85.9%),而与年龄或癌症类型无关。具有大学学历或更高学历的患者比通过电话或亲自就诊更倾向于选择电子方式来传递异常血液检测结果(比值比 2.18,95%置信区间:1.01-4.73,P<.05)。相比之下,年龄>65 岁的患者更倾向于选择通过电话或亲自交流来接收正常影像学结果(比值比:2.03,95%置信区间:1.16-3.56,P<.05),而年龄≤65 岁的患者则不倾向于选择这种方式。偏好也因恶性肿瘤类型而异。

结论

尽管许多癌症患者更喜欢通过电子方式接收“正常”监测结果,但大多数患者更倾向于与他们的医生直接交谈来接收异常结果。将常规的正常监测结果的沟通转移到基于技术的应用程序上可能会提高患者满意度并降低医疗保健系统的成本。

相似文献

1
Patient preferences on the use of technology in cancer surveillance after curative surgery: A cross-sectional analysis.患者对根治性手术后癌症监测中使用技术的偏好:一项横断面分析。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):782-788. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
Patient preferences for and satisfaction with methods of communicating test results in a primary care practice.初级医疗实践中患者对检查结果沟通方式的偏好及满意度。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Oct;35(10):497-501. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35068-0.
3
Identifying subgroups of well-being among patients with cancer: Differences in attitudes and preferences around surveillance after curative-intent surgery.识别癌症患者的健康亚组:根治性手术后监测方面的态度和偏好差异。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;120(2):125-131. doi: 10.1002/jso.25507. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.评估不列颠哥伦比亚省接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性在使用基于网络的调查问卷时参与者偏好和人口统计学特征的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 22;18(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5068.
5
Patient Preferences for Test Result Notification.患者对检查结果通知的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1651-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3344-0.
6
Preferences for Electronic Modes of Communication Among Older Primary Care Patients: Cross-sectional Survey.老年初级保健患者对电子通信方式的偏好:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 24;7:e40709. doi: 10.2196/40709.
7
Ecuadorian Cancer Patients' Preference for Information and Communication Technologies: Cross-Sectional Study.厄瓜多尔癌症患者对信息与通信技术的偏好:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 20;20(2):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8485.
8
Patients' preferences for biopsy result notification in an era of electronic messaging methods.在电子信息传递方式时代,患者对活检结果通知方式的偏好。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 May;151(5):513-21. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.5634.
9
Patient Preferences for Receiving Reports of Test Results.患者对接收检查结果报告的偏好。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(6):759-66. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.06.150030.
10
Optimizing Electronic Release of Imaging Results through an Online Patient Portal.通过在线患者门户优化影像结果的电子发布。
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):136-143. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180883. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review.基层医疗中血液检测结果的传达:一项混合方法的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Mar 27;75(753):e222-e231. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0338. Print 2025 Apr.
2
Surveillance-Associated Anxiety After Curative-Intent Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.根治性癌症手术后的监测相关焦虑:一项系统综述
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan;32(1):47-62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16287-5. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
3
Survey of Danish Head and Neck Cancer Patients' Positions on Personalized Medicine, Gene Tests, and Personalized Follow-Up.丹麦头颈癌患者对个性化医疗、基因检测和个性化随访的态度调查
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 11;14(4):404. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040404.
4
Patient experiences with patient-led, home-based follow-up after curative treatment for colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.患者在结直肠癌根治性治疗后接受以患者为中心、家庭为基础的随访的体验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 17;14(2):e081655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081655.
5
Telemedicine Acceptance Among Older Adult Patients With Cancer: Scoping Review.老年癌症患者对远程医疗的接受度:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 29;24(3):e28724. doi: 10.2196/28724.
6
Multicenter evaluation of breast cancer patients' satisfaction and experience with oncology telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对乳腺癌患者对肿瘤远程医疗访问的满意度和体验的多中心评估。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Nov;125(11):1486-1493. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01555-y. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
Follow-up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals.乳腺癌随访:医疗保健专业人员视角下的差异、最佳实践和改进机会。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Nov;30(6):e13505. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13505. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Does health literacy impact technological comfort in cancer patients?健康素养是否会影响癌症患者对技术的舒适度?
Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
9
Post-discharge Telemonitoring of Physical Activity, Vital Signs, and Patient-Reported Symptoms in Older Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery.癌症手术后老年患者的出院后远程监测体力活动、生命体征和患者报告的症状。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6512-6522. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09707-3. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
10
Telemedicine in Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery: An Effective Alternative in Post COVID-19 Pandemic.口腔颌面外科的远程医疗:后 COVID-19 大流行时期的有效选择。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 9;17(20):7365. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207365.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Intensity of Posttreatment Surveillance Testing and Detection of Recurrence in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.治疗后监测检测强度与结直肠癌患者复发检测的关系。
JAMA. 2018 May 22;319(20):2104-2115. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5816.
2
Clinical Cancer Advances 2018: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤进展 2018:美国临床肿瘤学会癌症进展年度报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;36(10):1020-1044. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.0446. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
Patients' Acceptance of Smartphone Health Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test.患者对用于慢性病管理的智能手机健康技术的接受度:一个理论模型与实证检验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 6;5(12):e177. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7886.
4
Cancer Survivors' Experience With Telehealth: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.癌症幸存者的远程医疗体验:系统评价与主题综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 9;19(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6575.
5
Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.非转移性结直肠癌患者的随访策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD002200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub3.
6
Anticipating the "Silver Tsunami": Prevalence Trajectories and Comorbidity Burden among Older Cancer Survivors in the United States.预测“银色海啸”:美国老年癌症幸存者的患病率轨迹与合并症负担
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jul;25(7):1029-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133.
7
Distance as a Barrier to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Review of the Literature.距离作为癌症诊断和治疗的障碍:文献综述
Oncologist. 2015 Dec;20(12):1378-85. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0110. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Trends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001-2009.2001 - 2009年切除结直肠癌的监测趋势
Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3525-33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29469. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial.根治性前列腺切除术后远程视频就诊的效率、满意度和成本:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):729-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
10
Medical models of teleoncology: current status and future directions.远程肿瘤学的医学模式:现状与未来方向。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep;10(3):200-4. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12225. Epub 2014 Jun 17.