Department of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Knowledge Institute of the Federation of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May;22(2):69-80. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12302. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
To develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for orthodontic retention (OR).
The CPG was developed according to the AGREE II instrument and EBRO (Dutch methodology for evidence-based guideline development). Reporting was done according the RIGHT statement. A Task Force developed clinical questions regarding OR. To answer these questions, a systematic literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was performed. Two independent researchers identified and selected studies, assessed risk of bias using Cochrane RoB tool and rated quality of evidence using GRADE. The Task Force formulated considerations and recommendations after discussing the evidence. The concept CPG was sent for commentary to all relevant stakeholders.
One systematic review-with 15 studies-met the inclusion criteria. In case of low evidence and lack of outcome measures, expert-based considerations were developed. Over four meetings, the Task Force reached consensus on considerations and recommendations, after which the concept CPG was ready for the commentary phase. After processing the comments, the CPG was presented to the Dutch Association of Orthodontists, whereafter authorization followed.
The paucity of evidence-based studies concerning OR and the reporting of measurable patient outcomes.
This CPG offers practitioner recommendations for best practice regarding OR, may reduce variation between practices and assists with patient aftercare. A carefully chosen retention procedure for individual patients, combined with clear information and communication between orthodontist, dentist and patient will contribute to long-term maintenance of orthodontic treatment results.
制定正畸保持(OR)的临床实践指南(CPG)。
该 CPG 是根据 AGREE II 工具和 EBRO(荷兰循证指南制定方法)制定的。报告遵循 RIGHT 声明。一个工作组针对 OR 提出了临床问题。为了回答这些问题,在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 中进行了系统的文献检索。两名独立的研究人员确定并选择了研究,使用 Cochrane RoB 工具评估了风险偏倚,并使用 GRADE 评估了证据质量。工作组在讨论证据后提出了考虑因素和建议。CPG 概念发送给所有相关利益相关者征求意见。
一项系统评价-包括 15 项研究-符合纳入标准。在证据水平低且缺乏结局测量的情况下,制定了基于专家的考虑因素。在四次会议上,工作组就考虑因素和建议达成了共识,之后 CPG 就可以进入征求意见阶段。在处理完意见后,CPG 提交给荷兰正畸医师协会,随后获得批准。
缺乏针对 OR 的基于证据的研究以及可衡量的患者结局报告。
该 CPG 为 OR 提供了实践建议,以实现最佳实践,可以减少实践之间的差异,并为患者提供后续护理。为个体患者精心选择保留程序,结合正畸医生、牙医和患者之间的清晰信息和沟通,将有助于长期维持正畸治疗效果。