Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Department of Family Studies and Human Development, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
J Pers. 2019 Dec;87(6):1189-1205. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12467. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
This study seeks to understand the ways in which spouses' gender-related attitudes are configured within couples and how such configurations are linked to marital satisfaction in Chinese marriage.
Latent profile analysis was conducted using dyadic data from a nationwide large sample of Chinese couples from the China Family Panel Studies (N = 7,257 couples; M = 28.36, SD = 12.84; M = 52.38, SD = 12.63; M = 50.51, SD = 12.37).
Four profile groups were identified: the "modern female and traditional male" group (MFTM); the "traditional female and modern male" group; the "child-oriented" group; and the "traditional female and traditional male" group. Husbands' and wives' marital satisfaction varied across groups in different patterns (yet all relevant effect sizes were modest). In general, husbands in the congruent group reported higher satisfaction than did those in the incongruent groups, whereas wives in the "MFTM" group reported lower satisfaction than did those in the other groups.
Such findings shed light on the understudied heterogeneity that inherently exists in the within-couple patterning of gender-related attitudes and its implications for marital well-being in a Chinese cultural context.
本研究旨在探讨配偶性别态度在夫妻关系中的构成方式,以及这些构成方式如何与中国婚姻中的婚姻满意度相关联。
使用来自全国大样本中国夫妻的中国家庭动态跟踪调查(CFPS)的对偶数据(N=7257 对夫妇;M=28.36,SD=12.84;M=52.38,SD=12.63;M=50.51,SD=12.37)进行潜在剖面分析。
确定了四个轮廓组:“现代女性和传统男性”组(MFTM);“传统女性和现代男性”组;“以孩子为中心”组;和“传统女性和传统男性”组。丈夫和妻子的婚姻满意度在不同的模式中因组而异(尽管所有相关的效应大小都适中)。一般来说,一致组的丈夫报告的满意度高于不一致组的丈夫,而“MFTM”组的妻子报告的满意度低于其他组的妻子。
这些发现揭示了在夫妻性别态度的内在模式中存在的被忽视的异质性,以及其对中国文化背景下婚姻幸福感的影响。