• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生培训13至18岁学童心肺复苏术的效果:一项系统评价。

Outcomes of medical students training schoolchildren of ages 13-18 in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.

作者信息

Li Peitong, Milkovic Anita, Morley Peter, Ng Louisa

机构信息

Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.

Department of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Victoria 3050, Australia.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2023 Sep 26;16:100463. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100463. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100463
PMID:37779883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10540049/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training schoolchildren in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can increase the number of qualified people in the community, which in turn can improve survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Medical students could be a valuable resource for providing the training. This systematic review aims to determine the outcomes of medical students providing CPR training to schoolchildren, aged 13-18 (who are thought to have the strength for effective chest compression), specifically CPR skills for both and non-technical skills such as communication and leadership for medical students.

METHODS

A literature search of academic databases was conducted on 5 July 2023 using the following keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, basic life support, medical students and high/middle/secondary school students. For the purpose of this review, "schoolchildren" refer to those aged 13-18. Studies were included where the primary focus was medical students teaching CPR to schoolchildren. The studies were critically appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) tool and outcomes categorised by Kirkpatrick's Levels.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included, six randomised controlled trials and five cohort studies, with 1670 schoolchildren and 355 medical students as participants. Eight studies examined outcomes targeting schoolchildren, two examined outcomes for medical students and one examined both. Four of the eleven studies used validated outcome measures. Only outcomes at Kirkpatrick Level 1 and 2 were found, and all outcomes for both schoolchildren and medical students were positive. Schoolchildren showed improvements in theoretical and practical elements of CPR post-training, while medical students demonstrated improved professional practice skills such as leadership and mentorship as well as improvements in their own CPR skills post-teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

Schoolchildren can effectively acquire CPR skills through being trained by medical students, who themselves also benefit from improved CPR and professional practice skills after teaching. Further studies with robust methodology such as multi-site randomised controlled trials, the use of consistent and validated outcome measures, and the measurement of outcomes at higher Kirkpatrick levels to determine the impact on bystander CPR rates and community OHCA survival rates, are needed.

摘要

背景

对学童进行心肺复苏术(CPR)培训可以增加社区中合格人员的数量,进而提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的存活率。医学生可能是提供此类培训的宝贵资源。本系统评价旨在确定医学生为13至18岁学童(被认为具备进行有效胸外按压的力量)提供CPR培训的效果,具体包括学童和医学生的CPR技能以及沟通和领导力等非技术技能。

方法

于2023年7月5日使用以下关键词对学术数据库进行文献检索:心肺复苏术、基础生命支持、医学生和高/初/中学生。在本评价中,“学童”指13至18岁的学生。纳入的研究主要是医学生向学童教授CPR。使用医学教育研究质量工具(MERSQI)对研究进行严格评价,并根据柯克帕特里克层次对结果进行分类。

结果

纳入了11项研究,其中6项随机对照试验和5项队列研究,共有1670名学童和355名医学生参与。8项研究考察了针对学童的结果,2项研究考察了医学生的结果,1项研究同时考察了两者。11项研究中有4项使用了经过验证的结果测量方法。仅发现了柯克帕特里克第1级和第2级的结果,学童和医学生的所有结果均为阳性。学童在培训后CPR的理论和实践方面均有进步,而医学生在教学后展示出领导和指导等专业实践技能的提升以及自身CPR技能的提高。

结论

学童通过医学生的培训能够有效地掌握CPR技能,而医学生自身在教学后也能从CPR技能和专业实践技能的提升中受益。需要开展进一步的研究,采用多中心随机对照试验等高质性方法,使用一致且经过验证的结果测量方法,并在更高的柯克帕特里克层次上测量结果,以确定对旁观者CPR率和社区OHCA存活率的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d7/10540049/75b21d20b1bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d7/10540049/75b21d20b1bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4d7/10540049/75b21d20b1bc/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of medical students training schoolchildren of ages 13-18 in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.医学生培训13至18岁学童心肺复苏术的效果:一项系统评价。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Sep 26;16:100463. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100463. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Education of schoolchildren in cardiopulmonary resuscitation - overview of the current literature.学童心肺复苏教育——当前文献综述
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Dec 1;29(6):616-620. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001111. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
The impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on schoolchildren and their CPR knowledge, attitudes toward CPR, and willingness to help others and to perform CPR: mixed methods research design.心肺复苏术(CPR)培训对学童及其 CPR 知识、对 CPR 的态度、以及帮助他人和实施 CPR 的意愿的影响:混合方法研究设计。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):915. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09072-y.
4
Self-confidence and level of knowledge after cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in 14 to 18-year-old schoolchildren: A randomised-interventional controlled study in secondary schools in Germany.14 至 18 岁学童心肺复苏培训后的自信心和知识水平:德国中学的一项随机干预对照研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jul;35(7):519-526. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000766.
5
Gender aspects in cardiopulmonary resuscitation by schoolchildren: A systematic review.儿童心肺复苏中的性别问题:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.心脏骤停时自动体外除颤器的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
7
Assessment of Community Interventions for Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估院外心脏骤停旁观者心肺复苏社区干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209256. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9256.
8
Kids save lives: Who should train schoolchildren in resuscitation? A systematic review.儿童挽救生命:谁应该培训小学生进行心肺复苏?一项系统综述。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Aug 29;20:100755. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100755. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Methods to teach schoolchildren how to perform and retain cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis.教小学生如何实施和保持心肺复苏术(CPR)技能的方法:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Aug 10;15:100439. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100439. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Innovative cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator programs in schools: Results from the Student Program for Olympic Resuscitation Training in Schools (SPORTS) study.创新性心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器在学校中的应用项目:来自学校奥林匹克复苏培训学生项目(SPORTS)研究的结果。
Resuscitation. 2016 Jul;104:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
An analysis of freshmen's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the influencing factors at a university in Wuhu City: a cross-sectional study.芜湖市某高校新生心肺复苏知识、态度及行为分析及其影响因素:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 8;13:1580600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1580600. eCollection 2025.
2
Short Survey on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Training in Rural British Columbia Schools: Preliminary Findings and Hypothesis-Generating Insights.不列颠哥伦比亚省农村学校心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器培训简短调查:初步结果与产生假设的见解
CJC Open. 2024 Jul 18;6(10):1240-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.07.006. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
KIDS SAVE LIVES: Basic Life Support Education for Schoolchildren: A Narrative Review and Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.儿童拯救生命:面向学龄儿童的基本生命支持教育:复苏国际联络委员会的叙述性综述和科学声明。
Resuscitation. 2023 Jul;188:109772. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109772. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Three-year trends in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the world: Second report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR).全球院外心脏骤停的三年趋势:国际复苏联合会联络委员会(ILCOR)的第二次报告
Resuscitation. 2023 May;186:109757. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109757. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
3
Aussie KIDS SAVE LIVES: A position statement from the Australian Resuscitation Council and supported by stakeholders.
澳大利亚儿童拯救生命:澳大利亚复苏委员会的立场声明,并得到利益相关者的支持。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):944-946. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13840. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Executive summary.欧洲复苏理事会指南 2021:执行摘要。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:1-60. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第1部分:执行摘要:2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S337-S357. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Mandatory cardiopulmonary resuscitation competencies for undergraduate healthcare students in Europe: A European Resuscitation Council guidance note.欧洲本科医学生的强制性心肺复苏技能:欧洲复苏委员会指导说明
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;37(10):839-841. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001272.
7
Implementation of basic life support training for school children: Online education for potential instructors? Results of a cluster randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.为学童实施基本生命支持培训:针对潜在教员的在线教育?一项整群随机对照非劣效性试验的结果
Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.041. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
Final-year medical students' knowledge of cardiac arrest and CPR: We must do more!医学生对心脏骤停和心肺复苏术的了解:我们必须做得更多!
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;296:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Impact of instructor professional background and interim retesting on knowledge and self-confidence of schoolchildren after basic life support training: a cluster randomised longitudinal study.导师专业背景和中期重测对基础生命支持培训后中小学生知识和自信心的影响:一项群组随机纵向研究。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Apr;36(4):239-244. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207923. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
App-based learning as an alternative for instructors in teaching basic life support to school children: a randomized control trial.基于应用程序的学习作为教师向学童教授基本生命支持的一种替代方法:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Clin Belg. 2019 Oct;74(5):317-325. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1500766. Epub 2018 Aug 14.