Napp Antonia, Kosan Janina, Hoffend Charlotte, Häge Anna, Breitfeld Philipp, Doehn Christoph, Daubmann Anne, Kubitz Jens, Beck Stefanie
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini-Str. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martini-Str. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.041. Epub 2020 May 15.
Comprehensive training of the population in basic life support (BLS) increases the chance of survival in cardiac arrest. To implement BLS trainings at schools a high number of instructors will be needed. This non-inferiority study investigated, if online education is effective to prepare instructors to teach BLS compared to face-to-face education.
A cluster randomised, controlled, single blinded study was performed in 2018 in Hamburg, Germany. A mixed group of potential instructors were allocated alternately to either the intervention or control group and participated in a four-hour instructor training. The instructor training of the control group was realised by trained educators. The intervention group participated in a self-regulated online training with hands-on training supported by peers. Instructors provided BLS training for high school students. The primary endpoint was a mean score in the BLS skills assessment of the students. The secondary endpoint was teaching effectiveness of the instructors.
BLS assessments of 808 students of 46 classes, who were taught by 74 instructors could be analysed. The students trained by interventional instructors achieved 0.14 points less (95% CI: -0.27 to 0.56) compared to students trained by control instructors (9.34 vs. 9.48). The non-inferiority could not be confirmed. The teaching performance in the intervention group was better in some aspects compared to the control group.
Integrating all results of this study, online education may be an effective alternative to prepare potential BLS instructors. Using free online courses, motivated persons can independently acquire necessary skills to become instructors and autonomously realise low cost BLS trainings at schools.
对公众进行基础生命支持(BLS)综合培训可增加心脏骤停时的存活几率。要在学校开展BLS培训,将需要大量的教员。这项非劣效性研究调查了在线教育与面对面教育相比,在培训BLS教员方面是否有效。
2018年在德国汉堡进行了一项整群随机、对照、单盲研究。一组潜在教员被交替分配到干预组或对照组,并参加为期四小时的教员培训。对照组的教员培训由训练有素的教育工作者实施。干预组参加了由同伴支持的实践培训的自主在线培训。教员为高中生提供BLS培训。主要终点是学生BLS技能评估的平均得分。次要终点是教员的教学效果。
可以分析由74名教员授课的46个班级的808名学生的BLS评估。与由对照教员培训的学生相比,由干预教员培训的学生得分低0.14分(95%CI:-0.27至0.56)(9.34对9.48)。未证实非劣效性。干预组的教学表现在某些方面优于对照组。
综合本研究的所有结果,在线教育可能是培训潜在BLS教员的有效替代方法。利用免费在线课程,有积极性的人可以独立获得成为教员所需技能,并在学校自主开展低成本的BLS培训。