Quality and Patient Safety Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Emeritus Professor of Economics, Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e024514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024514.
To evaluate whether hospital re-accreditation improves quality, patient safety and reliability over three accreditation cycles by testing the accreditation life cycle model on quality measures.
The validity of the life cycle model was tested by calibrating interrupted time series (ITS) regression equations for 27 quality measures. The change in the variation of quality over the three accreditation cycles was evaluated using the Levene's test.
A 650-bed tertiary academic hospital in Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Each month (over 96 months), a simple random sample of 10% of patient records was selected and audited resulting in a total of 388 800 observations from 14 500 records.
The impact of hospital accreditation on the 27 quality measures was observed for 96 months, 1-year preaccreditation (2007) and 3 years postaccreditation for each of the three accreditation cycles (2008, 2011 and 2014).
The life cycle model was evaluated by aggregating the data for 27 quality measures to produce a composite score (Y) and to fit an ITS regression equation to the unweighted monthly mean of the series.
The results provide some evidence for the validity of the four phases of the life cycle namely, the initiation phase, the presurvey phase, the postaccreditation slump and the stagnation phase. Furthermore, the life cycle model explains 87% of the variation in quality compliance measures (R=0.87). The best-fit ITS model contains two significant variables (β and β) (p≤0.001). The Levene's test (p≤0.05) demonstrated a significant reduction in variation of the quality measures (Y) with subsequent accreditation cycles.
The study demonstrates that accreditation has the capacity to sustain improvements over the accreditation cycle. The significant reduction in the variation of the quality measures (Y) with subsequent accreditation cycles indicates that accreditation supports the goal of high reliability.
通过对质量指标进行认证生命周期模型测试,评估医院再认证是否在三个认证周期内通过测试认证生命周期模型,提高质量、患者安全性和可靠性。
通过校准 27 项质量指标的中断时间序列(ITS)回归方程,验证生命循环模型的有效性。使用莱文检验评估三个认证周期内质量变化的变异。
阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比的一家 650 床三级学术医院。
每月(96 个月内),从 14500 份记录中随机抽取 10%的患者记录进行简单随机抽样,共进行了 388800 次观察。
观察了 96 个月的医院认证对 27 项质量指标的影响,以及三个认证周期(2008 年、2011 年和 2014 年)中的每一个周期的认证前一年(2007 年)和认证后三年。
通过汇总 27 项质量指标的数据来生成综合评分(Y),并拟合未加权的月度平均值系列的 ITS 回归方程,对生命循环模型进行评估。
结果为生命循环的四个阶段(启动阶段、预调查阶段、认证后滑坡阶段和停滞阶段)提供了一些证据。此外,生命循环模型解释了 87%的质量合规指标的变化(R=0.87)。最佳拟合 ITS 模型包含两个显著变量(β 和β)(p≤0.001)。莱文检验(p≤0.05)表明,随着随后的认证周期,质量指标(Y)的变化显著减少。
研究表明,认证有能力在认证周期内持续改进。随着随后的认证周期,质量指标(Y)的变化显著减少,表明认证支持高可靠性的目标。