Zhao Chenyang, Xiao Mengsu, Jiang Yuxin, Liu He, Wang Ming, Wang Hongyan, Sun Qiang, Zhu Qingli
Department of Ultrasound, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China,
Department of Breast Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jan 23;11:921-930. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S190966. eCollection 2019.
To investigate the feasibility of a CAD system S-detect on a database from a single Chinese medical center.
An experienced radiologist performed breast US examinations and made assessments of 266 consecutive breast lesions in 227 patients. S-detect classified the lesions automatically in a dichotomous form. An in-training resident who was blind to both the US diagnostic results and histological results reviewed the images afterward. The final histological results were considered as the diagnostic gold standard. The diagnostic performances and interrater agreements were analyzed.
A total of 266 focal breast lesions (161 benign lesions and 105 malignant lesions) were assessed in this study. S-detect had a lower sensitivity (87.07%) and a higher specificity (72.27%) compared with the experienced radiologist (sensitivity 98.1% and specificity 65.43%). The sensitivity and specificity of S-detect were better than that of the resident (sensitivity 82.86% and specificity 68.94%). The AUC value of S-detect (0.807) showed no significant difference with the experienced radiologist (0.817) and was higher than that of the resident (0.758). S-detect had moderate agreement with the experienced radiologist.
In this single-center study, a high level of diagnostic performance of S-detect on 266 breast lesions of Chinese women was observed. S-detect had almost equal diagnostic capacity with an experienced radiologist and performed better than a novice reader. S-detect was also distinguished for its high specificity. These results supported the feasibility of S-detect in aiding the diagnosis of breast lesions on an independent database.
探讨计算机辅助检测(CAD)系统S-detect在单一中国医学中心数据库上的可行性。
一名经验丰富的放射科医生对227例患者的266个连续乳腺病变进行了超声检查并做出评估。S-detect以二分法自动对病变进行分类。一名对超声诊断结果和组织学结果均不知情的住院医师随后对图像进行了复查。最终组织学结果被视为诊断金标准。分析了诊断性能和阅片者间的一致性。
本研究共评估了266个乳腺局灶性病变(161个良性病变和105个恶性病变)。与经验丰富的放射科医生相比,S-detect的敏感性较低(87.07%),特异性较高(72.27%)(经验丰富的放射科医生敏感性为98.1%,特异性为65.43%)。S-detect的敏感性和特异性优于住院医师(敏感性82.86%,特异性68.94%)。S-detect的曲线下面积(AUC)值(0.807)与经验丰富的放射科医生(0.817)无显著差异,且高于住院医师(0.758)。S-detect与经验丰富的放射科医生有中度一致性。
在这项单中心研究中,观察到S-detect对266例中国女性乳腺病变具有较高的诊断性能。S-detect与经验丰富的放射科医生的诊断能力几乎相当,且表现优于新手阅片者。S-detect还因其高特异性而突出。这些结果支持了S-detect在独立数据库上辅助乳腺病变诊断的可行性。