• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中植入物预防措施在减少术中微生物污染方面的疗效

Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination.

作者信息

Agarwal Aakash, Lin Boren, Wang Jeffrey C, Schultz Christian, Garfin Steve R, Goel Vijay K, Anand Neel, Agarwal Anand K

机构信息

University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

USC Spine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):62-66. doi: 10.1177/2192568218780676. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/2192568218780676
PMID:30775210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6362554/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective single-center study.

OBJECTIVES

Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence.

METHODS

Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one with an intraoperative guard (group 1) and the other without such a guard (group 2), each consisting of 5 samples distributed over 3 time points, were loaded onto the insertion device by the scrub tech and left on the sterile table. Approximately 20 minutes later, the lead surgeon who had just finished preparing the surgical site touches the pedicle screw. Then instead of implantation it was transferred to a sterile container using fresh clean gloves for bacterial and gene analysis. Guarded screw implies that even after unwrapping from the package, the screw carries an impermeable barrier along its entire length, which is only removed seconds prior to implantation.

RESULTS

The standard unguarded pedicle screws presented bioburden in the range of 10 to 10 (colony forming units/implant) with bacterial genus mostly consisting of and , the 2 most common genera found in surgical site infection reports. The common species among them were , , , and , whereas the guarded pedicle screws showed no bioburden.

CONCLUSIONS

Shielding the pedicle screws intraoperatively using a guard provides a superior level of asepsis than currently practiced. All unshielded pedicles screws were carrying bioburden of virulent bacterial species, which provides an opportunity for the development of postoperative infections.

摘要

研究设计

一项前瞻性单中心研究。

目的

评估在标准的术中操作中椎弓根螺钉的污染程度,以及使用不透水防护装置是否可以减轻或减少这种污染的发生。

方法

两组无菌预包装的椎弓根螺钉,一组带有术中防护装置(第1组),另一组没有这种防护装置(第2组),每组由分布在3个时间点的5个样本组成,由刷手护士装载到植入装置上并留在无菌台上。大约20分钟后,刚完成手术部位准备的主刀医生触摸椎弓根螺钉。然后,不是将其植入,而是使用干净的新手套将其转移到无菌容器中进行细菌和基因分析。带防护装置的螺钉意味着即使从包装中取出后,螺钉在其整个长度上仍带有不透水屏障,该屏障仅在植入前几秒钟才被移除。

结果

标准的无防护椎弓根螺钉的生物负荷在10至10(菌落形成单位/植入物)范围内,细菌属主要由手术部位感染报告中最常见的2个属 和 组成。其中常见的菌种有 、 、 和 ,而带防护装置的椎弓根螺钉未显示生物负荷。

结论

术中使用防护装置对椎弓根螺钉进行防护,可提供比目前操作更高水平的无菌状态。所有未防护的椎弓根螺钉都带有致病细菌种类的生物负荷,这为术后感染的发生提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/77bdb2e62aca/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/b5aa0798890e/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/350227c33fb8/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/5b4da4ed960e/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/682827c8be5d/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/bd0841b88b91/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/e07c2ac42a8f/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/74a1f0f9ca66/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/77bdb2e62aca/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/b5aa0798890e/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/350227c33fb8/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/5b4da4ed960e/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/682827c8be5d/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/bd0841b88b91/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/e07c2ac42a8f/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/74a1f0f9ca66/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de51/6362554/77bdb2e62aca/10.1177_2192568218780676-fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination.术中植入物预防措施在减少术中微生物污染方面的疗效
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):62-66. doi: 10.1177/2192568218780676. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
A Multicenter Trial Demonstrating Presence or Absence of Bacterial Contamination at the Screw-Bone Interface Owing to Absence or Presence of Pedicle Screw Guard, Respectively, During Spinal Fusion.一项多中心试验,分别在脊柱融合过程中观察有无椎弓根螺钉保护套时螺钉骨界面的细菌污染情况。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;33(8):E364-E368. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000976.
3
Updates on Evidence-Based Practices to Reduce Preoperative and Intraoperative Contamination of Implants in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.减少脊柱手术中植入物术前和术中污染的循证实践进展:一项叙述性综述
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Jun 21;4(2):111-116. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0038. eCollection 2020.
4
Implant Prophylaxis: The Next Best Practice Toward Asepsis in Spine Surgery.植入物预防:脊柱手术无菌操作的下一个最佳实践
Global Spine J. 2018 Oct;8(7):761-765. doi: 10.1177/2192568218762380. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Antimicrobial Effect of Polymer-Based Silver Nanoparticle Coated Pedicle Screws: Experimental Research on Biofilm Inhibition in Rabbits.基于聚合物的银纳米颗粒涂层椎弓根螺钉的抗菌作用:家兔生物膜抑制的实验研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(6):E323-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001223.
6
Benefit and accuracy of intraoperative 3D-imaging after pedicle screw placement: a prospective study in stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures.椎弓根螺钉置入术后术中三维成像的益处与准确性:一项关于胸腰椎骨折固定的前瞻性研究
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1469-77. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1050-5. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
7
Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography is as reliable as conventional computed tomography for identification of pedicle screw breach in thoracolumbar spine surgery.术中锥形束 CT 与传统 CT 对胸腰椎后路手术椎弓根螺钉突破的识别具有同等可靠性。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):2349-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07315-5. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.机器人辅助与透视引导下椎弓根螺钉置入治疗脊柱转移性疾病:配对队列比较
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1710.
9
Does Navigation Improve Accuracy of Placement of Pedicle Screws in Single-level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?: A Comparison Between Free-hand and Three-dimensional O-Arm Navigation Techniques.导航能否提高单节段腰椎退行性滑脱症椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性?徒手置入与三维O型臂导航技术的比较。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Oct;28(8):E472-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a9435e.
10
Development of a new technique for pedicle screw and Magerl screw insertion using a 3-dimensional image guide.利用三维图像引导开发新型椎弓根螺钉和 Magerl 螺钉置入技术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 1;37(23):1983-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825ab547.

引用本文的文献

1
Explantation of Pedicle Screws: When, Why, and How?椎弓根螺钉取出术:时机、原因及方法?
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71711. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Spectrum of Surgical Site Infection Pathogens in Chronic Infectious Spondylitis Requiring Revision Surgery: A 5-Year Cohort Study.需要翻修手术的慢性感染性脊柱炎手术部位感染病原体谱:一项5年队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 11;13(6):1592. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061592.
3
Use of Biomaterials in 3D Printing as a Solution to Microbial Infections in Arthroplasty and Osseous Reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Revision spine surgery in patients without clinical signs of infection: How often are there occult infections in removed hardware?翻修无临床感染迹象的脊柱手术患者:取出的内固定物中有多少是隐匿性感染?
Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2491-2495. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5654-5. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns in Breast Augmentation: A National Survey of Current Practice.隆乳术中抗菌预防的实践模式:一项关于当前实践的全国性调查。
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):629-632. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000942.
3
Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria.
生物材料在3D打印中的应用作为关节置换术和骨重建中微生物感染问题的解决方案
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Mar 1;9(3):154. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9030154.
4
Prevention of implant-associated spinal infections: the GAID-protocol.植入物相关脊柱感染的预防:GAID方案。
Front Surg. 2023 Nov 23;10:1308213. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1308213. eCollection 2023.
5
High Prevalence of Biofilms on Retrieved Implants from Aseptic Pseudarthrosis Cases.无菌性假关节病例取出的植入物上生物膜的高发生率。
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Sep 23;5(2):104-108. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0147. eCollection 2021.
6
Implant contamination as a cause of surgical site infection in spinal surgery: are single-use implants a reasonable solution? - a systematic review.植入物污染作为脊柱手术手术部位感染的一个原因:一次性使用植入物是一个合理的解决方案吗?——一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 25;21(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03653-z.
7
Implant Retention or Removal for Management of Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery.脊柱手术后手术部位感染管理中植入物的保留或取出
Global Spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):640-646. doi: 10.1177/2192568219869330. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
8
Updates on Evidence-Based Practices to Reduce Preoperative and Intraoperative Contamination of Implants in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.减少脊柱手术中植入物术前和术中污染的循证实践进展:一项叙述性综述
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Jun 21;4(2):111-116. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0038. eCollection 2020.
使用疾病控制中心手术部位感染标准的前瞻性随机对照试验中胸腰椎术后感染的分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 21;10:14. doi: 10.14444/3014. eCollection 2016.
4
Single-use instrumentation in posterior lumbar fusion could decrease incidence of surgical site infection: a prospective bi-centric study.后路腰椎融合术中使用一次性器械可降低手术部位感染发生率:一项前瞻性双中心研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Jan;26(1):21-6. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1692-4. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
Evaluation of the Time-dependent Contamination of Spinal Implants: Prospective Randomized Trial.脊柱植入物随时间变化的污染评估:前瞻性随机试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 15;40(16):1247-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000944.
6
Removing Outer Gloves as a Method to Reduce Spinal Surgery Infection.摘除外层手套作为降低脊柱手术感染的一种方法。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Jul;28(6):E343-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829046ca.
7
Implant contamination during spine surgery.脊柱手术中的植入物污染。
Spine J. 2013 Jun;13(6):637-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.053. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
8
Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.伤口保护器可降低手术部位感染:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):53-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182570372.
9
Surgical glove bacterial contamination and perforation during total hip arthroplasty implantation: when gloves should be changed.髋关节置换术中手术手套的细菌污染和穿孔:何时应更换手套。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4):432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.10.015. Epub 2012 May 10.
10
The 'pandora's box' dilemma: reprocessing of implantable screws and plates in orthopedic tray sets.“潘多拉魔盒”困境:骨科托盘套装中可植入螺钉和钢板的再处理
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2012 Spring;Suppl:55-9. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-12.1.55.