Mercincavage Melissa, Burdge Jordan, Lochbuehler Kirsten, Souprountchouk Valentina, McCullough Alexandra A, Strasser Andrew A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction [CIRNA], University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Psychiatry, CIRNA, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Tob Regul Sci. 2018 Nov;4(6):8-17. doi: 10.18001/TRS.4.6.2.
In this study, we sought to determine how smokers allocate their attention when viewing the 9 cigarette pictorial warning labels (PWLs) proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and identify PWL attributes associated with increased attention.
Using eye-tracking data from an exploratory within-subject study, we examined smokers' attention (latency, latency duration, and dwell time) to areas of interest (image vs textual warning) for each PWL among 95 daily, non-treatment-seeking smokers (62.1% male, 48.4% white, mean [SD] age = 32.98 [10.14], mean [SD] cigarettes/day = 15.51 [8.43]). We also compared attention measures by PWL message congruency, textual warning location, and participant rankings of effectiveness.
Attention measures differed significantly among PWLs (p < .001) and by features and self-reported effectiveness rankings (p < .001 - .039). Congruent PWLs, those displaying text across the warning label, and those ranked most effective were associated with sustained attention to image, whereas incongruent PWLs, those displaying left text, and those ranked least effective, were associated with faster and sustained attention to text.
Smokers allocated their attention differently across PWLs. Formats and participant effectiveness rankings of PWLs were associated with visual attention patterns, suggesting the importance of these features to the design of potential future PWLs.
在本研究中,我们试图确定吸烟者在查看美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提议的9种香烟图片警示标签(PWL)时如何分配注意力,并识别与注意力增加相关的PWL属性。
利用一项探索性的受试者内研究的眼动追踪数据,我们检查了95名每日吸烟、未寻求治疗的吸烟者(62.1%为男性,48.4%为白人,平均[标准差]年龄 = 32.98 [10.14],平均[标准差]每日吸烟量 = 15.51 [8.43])对每个PWL的感兴趣区域(图像与文字警示)的注意力(潜伏期、潜伏期持续时间和注视时间)。我们还通过PWL信息一致性、文字警示位置和参与者对有效性的排名比较了注意力测量结果。
PWL之间的注意力测量结果存在显著差异(p <.001),并且在特征和自我报告的有效性排名方面也存在显著差异(p <.001 -.039)。一致的PWL,即那些在警示标签上显示文字的PWL,以及那些被评为最有效的PWL,与对图像的持续注意力相关;而不一致的PWL,即那些显示左侧文字的PWL,以及那些被评为最无效的PWL,与对文字的更快且持续的注意力相关。
吸烟者在不同的PWL上分配注意力的方式不同。PWL的格式和参与者的有效性排名与视觉注意力模式相关,这表明这些特征对未来潜在PWL设计的重要性。