• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撰写实证性文章:透明度、可重复性、清晰度与可读性。

Writing Empirical Articles: Transparency, Reproducibility, Clarity, and Memorability.

作者信息

Gernsbacher Morton Ann

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018;1(3):403-414. doi: 10.1177/2515245918754485. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1177/2515245918754485
PMID:30775689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6377209/
Abstract

This article provides recommendations for writing empirical journal articles that enable transparency, reproducibility, clarity, and memorability. Recommendations for transparency include preregistering methods, hypotheses, and analyses; submitting registered reports; distinguishing confirmation from exploration; and showing your warts. Recommendations for reproducibility include documenting methods and results fully and cohesively, by taking advantage of open--science tools, and citing sources responsibly. Recommendations for clarity include writing short paragraphs, composed of short sentences; writing comprehensive abstracts; and seeking feedback from a naive audience. Recommendations for memorability include writing narratively; embracing the hourglass shape of empirical articles; beginning articles with a hook; and synthesizing, rather than Mad Libbing, previous literature.

摘要

本文提供了撰写实证性期刊文章的建议,这些建议有助于实现透明度、可重复性、清晰度和可读性。关于透明度的建议包括预先注册方法、假设和分析;提交注册报告;区分证实与探索;以及展示自身的不足。关于可重复性的建议包括充分且连贯地记录方法和结果,利用开放科学工具,并负责任地引用来源。关于清晰度的建议包括撰写由短句组成的短段落;撰写全面的摘要;以及从非专业读者那里寻求反馈。关于可读性的建议包括叙事性写作;采用实证性文章的沙漏型结构;以引人入胜的内容开篇;以及综合而非拼凑以往的文献。

相似文献

1
Writing Empirical Articles: Transparency, Reproducibility, Clarity, and Memorability.撰写实证性文章:透明度、可重复性、清晰度与可读性。
Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2018;1(3):403-414. doi: 10.1177/2515245918754485. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research.提高开放和严谨科学:与科学研究严谨性、可重复性和透明性相关的十个关键未来研究机会。
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 14;9:1235. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26594.1. eCollection 2020.
3
A clarity clinic for surgical writing.外科写作清晰度诊所。
J Surg Res. 2008 Jun 1;147(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.04.046. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
4
Extensions of open science for applied behavior analysis: Preregistration for single-case experimental designs.拓展应用行为分析的开放科学:单案例实验设计的预先注册。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024;57(4):808-820. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2909. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Creating Logical Flow When Writing Scientific Articles.撰写科技论文时的逻辑流程构建。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;36(40):e275. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e275.
6
Preregistering qualitative research.预先注册定性研究。
Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):229-244. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Registered Report Protocol: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research.注册报告方案:关于心理研究预注册态度和经验的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0253950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253950. eCollection 2021.
9
Ten tips for authors of scientific articles.给科学文章作者的十条建议。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Aug;29(8):1035-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.8.1035. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Plea for a Simple But Radical Change in Scientific Publication: To Improve Openness, Reliability, and Reproducibility, Let's Deposit and Validate Our Results before Writing Articles.呼吁对科学出版进行简单但彻底的改革:为了提高开放性、可靠性和可重复性,让我们在撰写文章之前先存放和验证我们的结果。
eNeuro. 2022 Sep 15;9(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0318-22.2022. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Empirical Failures of the Claim That Autistic People Lack a Theory of Mind.关于自闭症患者缺乏心理理论这一说法的实证性失败案例。
Arch Sci Psychol. 2019;7(1):102-118. doi: 10.1037/arc0000067. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
2
A consensus-based transparency checklist.基于共识的透明度清单。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):4-6. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6.
3
The registration continuum in clinical science: A guide toward transparent practices.临床科学中的注册连续性:透明实践指南。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Aug;128(6):528-540. doi: 10.1037/abn0000451.
4
What the replication crisis means for intervention science.复制危机对干预科学意味着什么。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Aug;154:3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.为有争议之事辩护:界定科研人员参与有争议研究行为的依据
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Feb;13(1):101-110. doi: 10.1177/1556264617743834. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Exploratory reports: A new article type for Cortex.探索性报告:《大脑皮层》的一种新文章类型。
Cortex. 2017 Nov;96:A1-A4. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
It's Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science.是时候拓宽可重复性对话了:来自临床心理科学的思考。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):742-756. doi: 10.1177/1745691617690042.
5
Ten simple rules for structuring papers.构建论文的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 28;13(9):e1005619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005619. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time.科学文献的可读性随着时间的推移而降低。
Elife. 2017 Sep 5;6:e27725. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27725.
7
Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers.普遍性约束(COG):所有实证论文的一个建议补充。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1123-1128. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708630. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology.被试幼稚与认知心理学的可重复性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1968-1972. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1348-y.
9
Editorial Perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma.编辑观点:在学术写作中使用“人在先”语言可能会加剧污名化。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;58(7):859-861. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12706.
10
Replicability and Reproducibility in Comparative Psychology.比较心理学中的可重复性和再现性。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 26;8:862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00862. eCollection 2017.