Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Australia.
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 18;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0915-x.
Previous studies in general practice and hospital settings have identified that prescribing of non-insulin diabetes medications may be sub-optimal in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and renal impairment. Since these publications, a number of new medications have become available for the management of T2D. Study aims were to, in a cohort of Australians with T2D and renal impairment attending general practice, (1) investigate whether the prescribing of non-insulin diabetes medications is consistent with dosing adjustments recommended within current Australian Diabetes Society (ADS) guidelines; and (2) identify patient socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with at least one prescription of a non-insulin diabetes medication inconsistent with current ADS guidelines for medication doses.
Cross-sectional study using data from the MedicineInsight general practice database managed by NPS MedicineWise. Patients with T2D who were aged 18 years and over, with an average eGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73m and at least one prescription of a non-insulin diabetes medication between 1st January 2015 and 30th June 2017 were included. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise patient characteristics and medication use. Marginal logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and prescribing of ≥1non-insulin diabetes medicine not consistent with ADS guidelines.
The majority of the 3505 patients included (90.4%) had an average eGFR of 30-59 ml/min/1.73m. In terms of absolute numbers, metformin was the medication most frequently prescribed at a dose not consistent with current ADS guidelines for dosing in renal impairment (n = 1601 patients), followed by DPP4 inhibitors (n = 611) and sulphonylureas (n = 278). The drug classes with the highest proportion of prescriptions with dosage not consistent with ADS guidelines were SGLT2 inhibitors (83%), followed by biguanides (58%) and DPP4 inhibitors (46%). Higher HbA1c, longer known diabetes duration and diagnosis of retinopathy were associated with receiving ≥1prescription with a dosage not consistent with guidelines.
Prescribing of non-insulin diabetes medications at doses inconsistent with current ADS guideline recommendations for dosing adjustments for people with renal impairment was common. Further research is needed to understand how general practitioners access, interpret and apply the ADS guidelines and the impact this may have on patient outcomes.
先前在普通科诊所和医院的研究表明,2 型糖尿病(T2D)和肾功能损害患者的非胰岛素糖尿病药物处方可能并不理想。自这些出版物发表以来,已有许多新药物可用于 T2D 的治疗。本研究旨在对在普通科就诊的患有 T2D 和肾功能损害的澳大利亚患者队列中,(1)研究非胰岛素糖尿病药物的处方是否符合当前澳大利亚糖尿病协会(ADS)指南中推荐的剂量调整;(2)确定与不符合当前 ADS 药物剂量指南的至少一种非胰岛素糖尿病药物处方相关的患者社会人口统计学和临床因素。
使用 NPS MedicineWise 管理的 MedicineInsight 普通科实践数据库中的数据进行横断面研究。纳入年龄在 18 岁及以上,平均 eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m,且在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间至少有一次非胰岛素糖尿病药物处方的 T2D 患者。采用描述性统计方法总结患者特征和药物使用情况。采用边缘逻辑回归模型估计社会人口统计学和临床因素与不符合 ADS 指南的至少一种非胰岛素糖尿病药物处方之间的关联。
纳入的 3505 例患者中(90.4%),大多数平均 eGFR 为 30-59ml/min/1.73m。就绝对数字而言,二甲双胍是剂量最常不符合当前 ADS 指南在肾功能损害中的剂量调整(n=1601 例)的药物,其次是 DPP4 抑制剂(n=611 例)和磺酰脲类药物(n=278 例)。剂量不符合 ADS 指南的处方比例最高的药物类别是 SGLT2 抑制剂(83%),其次是双胍类药物(58%)和 DPP4 抑制剂(46%)。较高的 HbA1c、较长的糖尿病病史和视网膜病变的诊断与接受剂量不符合指南的至少一种处方有关。
对于肾功能损害患者,非胰岛素糖尿病药物的处方剂量不符合当前 ADS 指南推荐的剂量调整建议的情况很常见。需要进一步研究以了解全科医生如何获取、解释和应用 ADS 指南,以及这可能对患者结局产生的影响。