• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of the pharmacovigilance systems of Brazil, Spain, the European Union and the United States based on the information provided by their regulatory agency websites.基于监管机构网站提供的信息,对巴西、西班牙、欧盟和美国的药物警戒系统进行比较分析。
Daru. 2019 Jun;27(1):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s40199-019-00249-4. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
3
Pharmacovigilance in India in Comparison With the USA and European Union: Challenges and Perspectives.印度与美国和欧盟的药物警戒:挑战与展望
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):781-786. doi: 10.1177/2168479018812775. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Harmonization of Pharmacovigilance Regulation in Brazil: Opportunities to Improve Risk Communication.巴西药物警戒法规的协调统一:改善风险沟通的机会。
Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
5
Provision of information on regulatory authorities' websites.在监管机构网站上提供信息。
Intern Med J. 2008 Jul;38(7):559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01588.x. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
6
Pharmacovigilance in Israel - tools, processes, and actions.以色列的药物警戒——工具、流程与行动
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Aug 1;6(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0154-3.
7
Issues with regulatory pharmacovigilance in East European countries: the industry perspective.东欧国家药品监管中的药物警戒问题:行业视角
Toxicol Lett. 2007 Feb 5;168(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.10.019. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
8
[Direct reporting by patients of adverse drug reactions in Spain].[西班牙患者对药物不良反应的直接报告]
Farm Hosp. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):65-71. doi: 10.7399/FH.2013.37.1.121.
9
Current state of biologic pharmacovigilance in the European Union: improvements are needed.欧盟生物药物警戒的现状:需要改进。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Mar;18(3):231-240. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1577818. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Key pharmacovigilance stakeholders' experiences of direct patient reporting of adverse drug reactions and their prospects of future development in the European Union.关键药物警戒利益相关者对欧盟患者直接报告药物不良反应的体验及其未来发展前景。
Public Health. 2018 Feb;155:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.11.023. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacovigilance in Vaccines: Importance, Main Aspects, Perspectives, and Challenges-A Narrative Review.疫苗的药物警戒:重要性、主要方面、前景与挑战——一篇叙述性综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;17(6):807. doi: 10.3390/ph17060807.
2
Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome After Administration of AZD1222 or Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine for COVID-19: A Systematic Review.接种 COVID-19 的 AZD1222 或 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗后发生血栓伴血小板减少综合征:系统评价。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211068487. doi: 10.1177/10760296211068487.

本文引用的文献

1
Possible adverse drug events leading to hospital admission in a Brazilian teaching hospital.巴西一所教学医院导致住院的潜在药物不良事件。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Mar;69(3):163-7. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(03)03.
2
Pharmacovigilance in Europe and North America: divergent approaches.欧洲和北美的药物警戒:不同的方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.046. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
Learning about the safety of drugs--a half-century of evolution.了解药物安全性——半个世纪的演变
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 8;365(23):2151-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1110327.
4
Trends of adverse drug reactions related-hospitalizations in Spain (2001-2006).西班牙与药物不良反应相关的住院治疗趋势(2001-2006 年)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 13;10:287. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-287.

基于监管机构网站提供的信息,对巴西、西班牙、欧盟和美国的药物警戒系统进行比较分析。

A comparative analysis of the pharmacovigilance systems of Brazil, Spain, the European Union and the United States based on the information provided by their regulatory agency websites.

机构信息

Doctoral Programme in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Pharmacist, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Professor Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, CEP 50670-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Daru. 2019 Jun;27(1):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s40199-019-00249-4. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s40199-019-00249-4
PMID:30778915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6593015/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance (PV) plays an essential role in monitoring and raising awareness of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Increasingly, ADRs are reported and PV information and activities are circulated via the Internet. PV actions are carried out by the Regulatory Agencies (RAs) responsible for medicinal products in each country.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to ascertain and assess the operation and areas of competence of the PV system in Brazil and to compare them with those of Spain, the European Union (EU) and the United States (USA), through the information available on the websites of the RAs in each country.

METHODS

A search of the information provided on the websites of these countries' RAs, establishing indicators to assess how far the information is available and accessible.

RESULTS

The RAs we studied are similarly organised and they complied with most of the 38 indicators we defined to obtain and assess the information they provide on PV procedures and their systems for electronic reporting of ADRs. Brazil's RA, ANVISA, complied with 100% of the areas of competence analysed and with 92.11% of the indicators established for the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazil's PV system, through ANVISA, achieves a good level of performance, both in itself and compared to the other RAs. There is room for improvement in three of the indicators analysed.

摘要

背景

药物警戒(PV)在监测和提高对药物不良反应(ADR)的认识方面发挥着重要作用。越来越多的 ADR 通过互联网报告,PV 信息和活动也在互联网上传播。PV 行动由负责每个国家药品的监管机构(RA)进行。

目的

本研究的目的是通过对各国 RA 网站上的信息进行评估,确定和评估巴西的 PV 系统的运作和能力领域,并将其与西班牙、欧盟(EU)和美国(USA)进行比较。

方法

对这些国家 RA 网站上提供的信息进行搜索,确定评估信息的可用性和可访问性的指标。

结果

我们研究的 RA 组织类似,并且它们符合我们为获取和评估其提供的关于 PV 程序及其 ADR 电子报告系统的信息而定义的 38 个指标中的大多数。巴西的 RA,ANVISA,符合我们分析的能力领域的 100%,以及为研究确定的指标的 92.11%。

结论

通过 ANVISA,巴西的 PV 系统在自身和与其他 RA 相比都达到了良好的水平。在分析的三个指标中还有改进的空间。