• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含 0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%西吡氯铵辅助治疗种植体周围疾病的临床效果:一项随机临床试验。

Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri-implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal Diseases) Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Mar;46(3):342-353. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13088.

DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13088
PMID:30779246
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse, as an adjunct to professionally and patient-administered mechanical plaque removal, in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PiM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients displaying PiM in, at least, one implant were included in this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Subjects received professional prophylaxis (baseline and 6 months) and were instructed to regular oral hygiene practices and to rinse, twice daily, with the test or placebo mouth rinses, during one year. Clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Disease resolution was defined as absence of bleeding on probing (BOP). Data were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA, Student's t and chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included and 46 attended the final visit (22 in control and 24 in test group). In the test group, there was a 24.49% greater reduction in BOP at the buccal sites (95% confidence interval [3.65-45.34%]; p = 0.002) than in controls. About 58.3% of test implants and 50% controls showed healthy peri-implant tissues at final visit (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the test mouth rinse demonstrated some adjunctive benefits in the treatment of PiM. Complete disease resolution could not be achieved in every case.

摘要

目的

评估 0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%十六烷基吡啶氯口腔冲洗液作为专业和患者辅助机械菌斑去除的辅助手段,在治疗种植体周围黏膜炎(PiM)中的疗效。

材料和方法

本随机、双盲、临床试验纳入了至少一个种植体存在 PiM 的患者。受试者接受专业预防措施(基线和 6 个月),并被指示定期进行口腔卫生,并在一年内每天两次使用试验或安慰剂漱口液漱口。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时评估临床、放射和微生物学结果。疾病缓解定义为探诊无出血(BOP)。数据通过重复测量方差分析、学生 t 检验和卡方检验进行分析。

结果

54 名患者入组,46 名患者完成了最终随访(对照组 22 名,试验组 24 名)。在试验组,颊侧 BOP 减少了 24.49%(95%置信区间 [3.65-45.34%];p=0.002),而对照组则减少了 95%置信区间 [3.65-45.34%]。在最终随访时,试验组约有 58.3%的种植体和 50%的对照组显示出健康的种植体周围组织(p>0.05)。

结论

使用试验漱口液在治疗 PiM 方面显示出一些辅助益处。并非每个病例都能达到完全的疾病缓解。

相似文献

1
Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri-implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial.含 0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%西吡氯铵辅助治疗种植体周围疾病的临床效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Mar;46(3):342-353. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13088.
2
Efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in reducing inflammation around the teeth and implants: a randomized clinical trial.0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%十六烷基吡啶氯口腔冲洗液减少牙齿和种植体周围炎症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1729-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03474-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
3
Efficacy of 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis.0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定用于种植体周围黏膜炎非手术治疗的疗效
J Periodontol. 2016 Nov;87(11):1305-1313. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160144. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Implant decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.手术治疗种植体周围炎期间使用2%氯己定进行种植体去污:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26(9):1015-23. doi: 10.1111/clr.12419. Epub 2014 May 26.
5
Efficacy of a low-concentration chlorhexidine mouth rinse in non-compliant periodontitis patients attending a supportive periodontal care programme: a randomized clinical trial.低浓度洗必泰含漱液对参加牙周支持治疗患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Mar;37(3):266-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01521.x. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
6
Clinical response to 2 different therapeutic regimens to treat peri-implant mucositis.两种不同治疗方案治疗种植体周围黏膜炎的临床反应。
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1118-25. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1118.
7
A randomized clinical trial on the short-term clinical and microbiological effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.05% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for patients in supportive periodontal care.一项关于在支持性牙周治疗中,辅助使用0.05%氯己定漱口水对患者短期临床和微生物学影响的随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Jan;31(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00438.x.
8
Comparison of the postoperative anti-inflammatory efficacy of chlorhexidine, saline rinses and herbal mouthwashes after mechanical debridement in patients with peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled trial.种植体周围黏膜炎患者机械清创后氯己定、生理盐水冲洗及草药漱口水术后抗炎效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):203-210. doi: 10.1111/idh.12582. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
9
Comparison of an Herbal- and a 0.12% Chlorhexidine-based Oral Rinse as Adjuncts to Nonsurgical Mechanical Debridement in the Management of Peri-implant Mucositis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.草药漱口水与0.12%氯己定漱口水作为非手术机械清创辅助治疗种植体周围黏膜炎的比较:一项随机对照试验
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Sep 4;18(4):645-651. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45069.
10
Comparison of the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride with an essential oil mouth rinse on dental plaque and gingivitis - a six-month randomized controlled clinical trial.氯化十六烷基吡啶与一种精油漱口水对牙菌斑和牙龈炎影响的比较——一项为期六个月的随机对照临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Aug;34(8):658-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01103.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiseptics Prescription for the Prevention and Treatment of Periodontal Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.用于预防和治疗牙周疾病的防腐剂处方:综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;8(7):e71019. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71019. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Comparative evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants hygiene protocols on subgingival bacterial load.正畸微型种植体卫生方案对龈下细菌负荷的比较评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 Mar 24;30(1):e2524108. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524108.oar. eCollection 2025.
3
Nanozymes: a promising solution for dental antibacterial applications.
纳米酶:牙科抗菌应用的一种有前景的解决方案。
RSC Adv. 2024 Nov 20;14(50):36945-36959. doi: 10.1039/d4ra07303g. eCollection 2024 Nov 19.
4
Maintenance of peri-implant health in general dental practice.一般牙科实践中的种植体周围健康维护。
Br Dent J. 2024 May;236(10):781-789. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7406-8. Epub 2024 May 24.
5
Local Oxygen-Based Therapy (bluem) for Treatment of Peri-Implant Disease: Clinical Case Presentation and Review of Literature about Conventional Local Adjunct Therapies.局部氧疗(bluem)治疗种植体周围病:临床病例报告及常规局部辅助治疗文献复习。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 8;60(3):447. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030447.
6
A Single Dose of Piperacillin Plus Tazobactam Gel as an Adjunct to Professional Mechanical Plaque Removal (PMPR) in Patients with Peri-Implant Mucositis: A 6-Month Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.单剂量哌拉西林加他唑巴坦凝胶作为种植体周围黏膜炎患者专业机械性菌斑清除(PMPR)辅助治疗的6个月双盲随机临床试验。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Mar 17;13(3):269. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13030269.
7
Revisiting Oral Antiseptics, Microorganism Targets and Effectiveness.重新审视口腔抗菌剂、微生物靶点及有效性
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 29;13(9):1332. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091332.
8
The Effectiveness of the Association of Chlorhexidine with Mechanical Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis.洗必泰联合机械治疗种植体周围黏膜炎的有效性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;11(13):1918. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131918.
9
Current Status of Peri-Implant Diseases: A Clinical Review for Evidence-Based Decision Making.种植体周围疾病的现状:基于证据的临床决策综述
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Apr 10;14(4):210. doi: 10.3390/jfb14040210.
10
The Antimicrobial Activity of Curcumin and Xanthohumol on Bacterial Biofilms Developed over Dental Implant Surfaces.姜黄素和黄腐酚对种植体表面细菌生物膜的抗菌活性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 25;24(3):2335. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032335.