• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%十六烷基吡啶氯口腔冲洗液减少牙齿和种植体周围炎症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in reducing inflammation around the teeth and implants: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1729-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03474-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03474-3
PMID:32737664
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinse, as an adjunct to professional plaque removal (PPR) and mechanical hygiene, in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PiM) and gingivitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients displaying PiM in, at least, one implant were included in this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Subjects received PPR (at baseline and 6-month visits) and were instructed to rinse, twice daily, during 1 year with the tested mouth rinse or a placebo. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included in the study and 46 attended the final visit. In the teeth and implants with inflammation, a higher reduction in BOP was observed in the test group. Statistically significant differences between groups were only observed in the lingual sites of the teeth with gingivitis (mean difference = 11.96%; 95% confidence interval [1.09; 22.83]; p = 0.03). Overall, compliance and satisfaction were good, even though staining were higher for the test group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of mechanical debridement with a 0.03% CHX and 0.05% CPC mouth rinse may have adjunctive benefits in the management of gingivitis, and it is associated with a higher degree of staining.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The control of gingivitis can be improved, after professional mechanical debridement, with toothbrushing and the supplementary use of a 0.03% CHX and 0.05% CPC mouth rinse at home.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03533166.

摘要

目的

评估 0.03%洗必泰(CHX)和 0.05%十六烷基吡啶(CPC)漱口水作为专业牙菌斑去除(PPR)和机械清洁辅助治疗的疗效,用于治疗种植体周围黏膜炎(PiM)和牙龈炎。

材料和方法

本随机、双盲、临床试验纳入了至少一个种植体上存在 PiM 的患者。受试者接受 PPR(基线和 6 个月访视),并被指示在 1 年内每天使用两次测试漱口水或安慰剂进行漱口。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月记录临床和患者报告的结果。

结果

本研究共纳入 54 名患者,其中 46 名患者完成了最终访视。在有炎症的牙齿和种植体中,实验组的 BOP 降低幅度更大。仅在牙龈炎牙齿的舌侧部位观察到组间存在统计学显著差异(平均差异=11.96%;95%置信区间[1.09;22.83];p=0.03)。总体而言,即使实验组的染色更高(p<0.05),但依从性和满意度仍较好。

结论

机械清创联合使用 0.03%CHX 和 0.05%CPC 漱口水可能对牙龈炎的治疗具有辅助作用,并且与更高程度的染色相关。

临床相关性

在专业机械清创后,通过刷牙和在家中补充使用 0.03%CHX 和 0.05%CPC 漱口水,可以改善牙龈炎的控制。

临床试验注册号

NCT03533166。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in reducing inflammation around the teeth and implants: a randomized clinical trial.0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%十六烷基吡啶氯口腔冲洗液减少牙齿和种植体周围炎症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1729-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03474-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri-implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial.含 0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%西吡氯铵辅助治疗种植体周围疾病的临床效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Mar;46(3):342-353. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13088.
3
Efficacy of 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash as an adjunct to toothbrushing compared with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in reducing dental plaque and gingival inflammation: A randomized control trial.与0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定漱口水相比,0.05%西吡氯铵漱口水辅助刷牙在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎症方面的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):195-202. doi: 10.1111/idh.12614. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
4
Comparison of the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride with an essential oil mouth rinse on dental plaque and gingivitis - a six-month randomized controlled clinical trial.氯化十六烷基吡啶与一种精油漱口水对牙菌斑和牙龈炎影响的比较——一项为期六个月的随机对照临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Aug;34(8):658-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01103.x.
5
Long-term efficacy of a 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in relation to plaque and gingivitis: a 6-month randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial.0.07%西吡氯铵含漱液对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的长期疗效:一项为期6个月的随机、赋形剂对照临床试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 May;13(2):93-103. doi: 10.1111/idh.12082. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
A 6-month clinical study assessing the safety and efficacy of two cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinses.一项为期6个月的临床研究,评估两种西吡氯铵漱口水的安全性和有效性。
Am J Dent. 2005 Jul;18 Spec No:24A-28A.
7
A clinical investigation of the efficacy of a commercial mouthrinse containing 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride to control established dental plaque and gingivitis.一项关于含0.05%西吡氯铵的商用漱口水控制已形成牙菌斑和牙龈炎疗效的临床研究。
J Clin Dent. 2009;20(2):55-61.
8
A 6-month clinical trial to study the effects of a cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinse on gingivitis and plaque.一项为期6个月的临床试验,旨在研究氯化十六烷基吡啶漱口水对牙龈炎和牙菌斑的影响。
Am J Dent. 2005 Jul;18 Spec No:9A-14A.
9
Efficacy of a new mouth rinse formulation based on 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a 6-month randomized clinical trial.基于 0.07%西吡氯铵的新型漱口液配方在控制菌斑和牙龈炎中的功效:一项为期 6 个月的随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1007-15. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12158. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
10
Clinical and microbiological effects of the use of a cetylpyridinium chloride dentifrice and mouth rinse in orthodontic patients: a 3-month randomized clinical trial.在正畸患者中使用氯化十六烷基吡啶牙膏和漱口水的临床及微生物学效果:一项为期3个月的随机临床试验
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Sep 28;40(5):465-474. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx096.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of seven non-surgical methods combined with mechanical debridement in peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: A network meta-analysis.比较七种非手术方法联合机械清创术治疗种植体周围炎和种植体周围黏膜炎的疗效:一项网状荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 14;19(8):e0305342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305342. eCollection 2024.
2
Maintenance of peri-implant health in general dental practice.一般牙科实践中的种植体周围健康维护。
Br Dent J. 2024 May;236(10):781-789. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7406-8. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
Revisiting Oral Antiseptics, Microorganism Targets and Effectiveness.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of peri-implant diseases - a critical review on the current evidence.种植体周围疾病的患病率——对当前证据的批判性综述
Braz Oral Res. 2019 Sep 30;33(suppl 1):e063. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0063. eCollection 2019.
2
Efficacy of adjunctive anti-plaque chemical agents in managing gingivitis: A systematic review and network meta-analyses.辅助性抗菌斑化学制剂治疗牙龈炎的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jul;46(7):723-739. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13127. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri-implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial.
重新审视口腔抗菌剂、微生物靶点及有效性
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 29;13(9):1332. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091332.
4
The Effectiveness of the Association of Chlorhexidine with Mechanical Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis.洗必泰联合机械治疗种植体周围黏膜炎的有效性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;11(13):1918. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131918.
5
Efficacy of Adjunctive Chlorhexidine in non-surgical treatment of Peri-Implantitis/Peri-Implant Mucositis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助洗必泰在种植体周围炎/种植体周围黏膜炎非手术治疗中的疗效:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):595-604. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.7253.
6
Adjunctive Use of Active Compounds such as Chlorhexidine in the Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis for Oral Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.辅助使用洗必泰等活性化合物治疗口腔种植体周围黏膜炎的非手术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Aug 27;2022:2312784. doi: 10.1155/2022/2312784. eCollection 2022.
7
The Effects of Three Chlorhexidine-Based Mouthwashes on Human Osteoblast-Like SaOS-2 Cells. An In Vitro Study.三种基于洗必泰的漱口液对人成骨样 SaOS-2 细胞的影响。一项体外研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 15;22(18):9986. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189986.
8
Efficacy of 0.05% Chlorhexidine and 0.05% Cetylpyridinium Chloride Mouthwash to Eliminate Living Bacteria on In Situ Collected Biofilms: An In Vitro Study.0.05%氯己定和0.05%西吡氯铵漱口水对原位收集生物膜上存活细菌的清除效果:一项体外研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;10(6):730. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060730.
含 0.03%洗必泰和 0.05%西吡氯铵辅助治疗种植体周围疾病的临床效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Mar;46(3):342-353. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13088.
4
The depth of the implant mucosal tunnel modifies the development and resolution of experimental peri-implant mucositis: A case-control study.种植体黏膜隧道的深度会改变实验性种植体周围黏膜炎的发展和转归:一项病例对照研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Feb;46(2):248-255. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13066. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implant diseases in Spain.西班牙种植体周围病的流行状况及风险因素
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Dec;45(12):1510-1520. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13017. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
Plaque-induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations.菌斑性龈炎:病例定义与诊断要点。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S46-S73. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0576.
7
Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.牙周健康和牙龈疾病及状况在完整和被减少的牙周组织:2017 年世界牙周病和种植体周围病分类研讨会工作组 1 的共识报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S68-S77. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12940.
8
Peri-implant mucositis.种植体周围黏膜炎。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S237-S245. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12953.
9
Biological effect of the abutment material on the stability of peri-implant marginal bone levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基台材料对种植体边缘骨稳定性的生物学效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:124-144. doi: 10.1111/clr.13293. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
Epidemiology and risk factors of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.种植体周围炎的流行病学和危险因素:系统评价。
J Periodontal Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):657-681. doi: 10.1111/jre.12562. Epub 2018 Jun 7.