Suppr超能文献

运用标准设定判定社区卫生工作者是否“准备好上岗”。

Determining whether Community Health Workers are 'Deployment Ready' Using Standard Setting.

机构信息

Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, GB.

Partners in Health, MW.

出版信息

Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):630-639. doi: 10.9204/aogh.2369.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community Health Workers (CHWs) provide basic health screening and advice to members of their own communities. Although CHWs are trained, no CHW programmes have used a formal method to identify the level of achievement on post-training assessments that distinguishes "safe" from "unsafe". Objectives: The aim of this study was to use Ebel method of standard setting for a post-training written knowledge assessment for CHWs in Neno, Malawi.

METHODS

12 participants agreed the definitions of a "just-deployment ready" and an "ideal" CHW. Participants rated the importance and difficulty of each question on a three-point scale and also indicated the proportion of "just-deployment ready" CHWs expected to answer each of the nine question types correctly. Mean scores were used to determine the passing standard, which was reduced by one standard error of measurement (SEM) as this was the first time any passing standard had been employed.The level of agreement across participants' ratings of importance and difficulty was calculated using Krippendorf's alpha. The assessment results from the first cohort of CHW trainees were analysed using classical test theory.

FINDINGS

There was poor agreement between participants on item ratings of both importance and difficulty (Krippendorf's alphas of 0.064 and 0.074 respectively). The pass mark applied to the assessment, following adjustment using the SEM, was 53.3%. Based on this pass mark, 68% of 129 CHW trainees were 'clear passes', 11% 'borderline passes', 9% 'borderline fails' and 12% 'clear fails'.

CONCLUSIONS

Determining whether a CHW is deployment-ready is an important, but difficult exercise, as evidenced by a lack of agreement regarding question importance and difficulty. Future exercises should allow more time for training, discussion and modification of ratings. Based on the assessment, most CHWs trained could be considered deployment-ready, but following-up their performance in the field will be vital to validate the pass mark set.

摘要

背景

社区卫生工作者(CHW)为其所在社区的成员提供基本的健康筛查和建议。虽然 CHW 接受过培训,但没有任何 CHW 计划使用正式方法来确定培训后评估的达标水平,以区分“安全”和“不安全”。目的:本研究旨在使用 Ebel 标准设定方法对马拉维 Neno 的 CHW 进行培训后书面知识评估。

方法

12 名参与者同意了“刚部署就绪”和“理想”CHW 的定义。参与者对每个问题的重要性和难度进行了三分制评分,还指出了预计有多少“刚部署就绪”的 CHW 能够正确回答九种题型中的每一种。平均分用于确定通过标准,由于这是首次使用任何通过标准,因此将其降低一个测量标准误差(SEM)。参与者对重要性和难度的评分之间的一致性使用 Krippendorf 的 alpha 进行计算。使用经典测试理论对第一组 CHW 培训生的评估结果进行了分析。

发现

参与者对项目评分的重要性和难度的一致性较差(Krippendorf 的 alpha 值分别为 0.064 和 0.074)。根据 SEM 进行调整后,应用于评估的通过分数为 53.3%。根据这个通过分数,129 名 CHW 培训生中有 68%是“明确通过”,11%是“边缘通过”,9%是“边缘失败”,12%是“明确失败”。

结论

确定 CHW 是否具备部署能力是一项重要但困难的工作,因为在问题的重要性和难度方面缺乏共识。未来的练习应该为培训、讨论和评分修改留出更多时间。根据评估结果,大多数接受培训的 CHW 可以被认为是具备部署能力的,但在实地跟进他们的表现对于验证设定的通过分数至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d6/6748218/92a66b1dfee4/agh-84-4-2369-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验