Ivey Gavin, Deans Carolyn
Discipline of Psychology, College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Am J Psychother. 2019 Mar 1;72(1):9-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20180005. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
This article reports on a research project investigating psychology graduate students' experiences of Y model psychotherapy training at an Australian university. Focus group interviews were conducted with clinical psychology students (N=20), and thematic analysis was used to capture core aspects of their training experience. Participants felt that the dual training in cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy gave them a significant advantage over students trained in only a single approach. Notwithstanding the perceived benefits of their training, participants emphasized how intellectually and emotionally demanding it was. Students struggled to shift between therapeutic orientations, both in learning about and conducting different therapies and in accommodating differing supervisory expectations. Psychodynamic therapy was viewed as the most conceptually, technically, and personally challenging component to learn, but also as the most enriching. Despite the emphasis the students placed on the psychodynamic arm of the Y model training, participants reported a variety of therapeutic identity positions, and most maintained a flexible view of how they would practice therapeutically.
本文报道了一个研究项目,该项目调查了澳大利亚一所大学心理学研究生接受Y型心理治疗培训的经历。对临床心理学专业的学生(N = 20)进行了焦点小组访谈,并采用主题分析法来捕捉他们培训经历的核心方面。参与者认为,认知行为疗法和心理动力疗法的双重培训使他们比仅接受单一方法培训的学生具有显著优势。尽管他们认识到培训的益处,但参与者强调了培训在智力和情感上的高要求。学生们在学习和实施不同疗法以及适应不同的督导期望时,很难在不同治疗方向之间转换。心理动力疗法被视为在概念、技术和个人层面上最难学习的部分,但也是最有收获的部分。尽管学生们强调了Y型模型培训中心理动力疗法这一方面,但参与者报告了多种治疗身份立场,并且大多数人对自己的治疗实践方式保持灵活的看法。