• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项 3 期随机对照试验中,采用托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎患者的健康相关生活质量。

Health-related quality of life in patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK.

出版信息

Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Feb 20;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1837-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13075-019-1837-7
PMID:30786937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6381622/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) every week or every other week and prednisone tapering achieved superior rates of sustained remission to patients treated with placebo and prednisone tapering in a randomised controlled trial. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients from this trial is now reported.

METHODS

Exploratory analyses of SF-36 PCS and MCS and domain scores, PtGA and FACIT-Fatigue were performed in patients treated with weekly subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg plus 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ-QW + Pred-26) or placebo plus 26-week or 52-week prednisone tapers (PBO + Pred-26 or PBO + Pred-52). These analyses were performed on responder and non-responder patients, including those who achieved the primary outcome and those who experienced flare and received escape prednisone doses.

RESULTS

Baseline SF-36 PCS, MCS and domain scores were low, indicating impaired HRQOL related to GCA. At week 52, least squares mean (LSM) changes in PCS scores improved with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 but worsened in both PBO + Pred groups (p <  0.001). LSM changes in MCS scores increased with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 versus PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.001). Treatment with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 resulted in significantly greater improvement in four of eight SF-36 domains compared with PBO + Pred-26 and six of eight domains compared with PBO + Pred-52 (p < 0.01). Improvement with TCZ-QW + Pred-26 met or exceeded minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in all eight domains compared with five domains with PBO + Pred-26 and none with PBO + Pred-52. Domain scores in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group at week 52 met or exceeded age- and gender-matched normative values (A/G norms). LSM changes from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue scores increased significantly with TCZ-QW + Pred-26, exceeding MCID and A/G norms (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GCA receiving TCZ-QW + Pred-26 reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SF-36 and FACIT-Fatigue scores compared with those receiving prednisone only. Improvements in the TCZ-QW + Pred-26 group led to recovery of HRQOL to levels at least comparable to those of A/G-matched normative values at week 52 and exceeded normative values in five of eight domains.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01791153. Date of registration: February 13, 2013.

摘要

背景

在一项随机对照试验中,每周或每两周接受托珠单抗(TCZ)治疗并逐渐减少泼尼松剂量的巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者达到持续缓解的比例优于接受安慰剂和逐渐减少泼尼松剂量的患者。现在报告了该试验中患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。

方法

对每周皮下注射 TCZ 162mg 加 26 周泼尼松减量(TCZ-QW + Pred-26)或安慰剂加 26 周或 52 周泼尼松减量(PBO + Pred-26 或 PBO + Pred-52)治疗的患者进行 SF-36 PCS 和 MCS 以及域评分、PtGA 和 FACIT-Fatigue 的探索性分析。这些分析针对应答者和无应答者患者进行,包括达到主要结局的患者和经历发作并接受逃逸泼尼松剂量的患者。

结果

基线 SF-36 PCS、MCS 和域评分较低,表明与 GCA 相关的 HRQOL 受损。在第 52 周时,TCZ-QW + Pred-26 治疗的最小二乘均值(LSM)变化改善,但 PBO + Pred 两组均恶化(p < 0.001)。TCZ-QW + Pred-26 治疗的 MCS 评分 LSM 升高,与 PBO + Pred-52 相比(p < 0.001)。与 PBO + Pred-26 相比,TCZ-QW + Pred-26 治疗导致 8 个 SF-36 域中的 4 个域显著改善,与 PBO + Pred-52 相比 6 个域显著改善(p < 0.01)。与 PBO + Pred-26 相比,TCZ-QW + Pred-26 治疗在所有 8 个域中改善均达到或超过最小临床重要差异(MCID),而在 5 个域中达到或超过 PBO + Pred-26,在 8 个域中均未达到 PBO + Pred-52。TCZ-QW + Pred-26 组第 52 周的域评分达到或超过年龄和性别匹配的正常范围(A/G 正常值)。TCZ-QW + Pred-26 治疗的 FACIT-Fatigue 评分的 LSM 从基线开始的变化显著增加,达到 MCID 和 A/G 正常值(p < 0.001)。

结论

与仅接受泼尼松治疗的患者相比,接受 TCZ-QW + Pred-26 治疗的 GCA 患者报告 SF-36 和 FACIT-Fatigue 评分有统计学意义和有临床意义的改善。TCZ-QW + Pred-26 组的改善导致 HRQOL 恢复到至少与 A/G 匹配的正常水平相当的水平,并且在 8 个域中的 5 个域中超过了正常值。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01791153。注册日期:2013 年 2 月 13 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/97773af13400/13075_2019_1837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/c92fccdf4109/13075_2019_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/8a379a566bbb/13075_2019_1837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/97773af13400/13075_2019_1837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/c92fccdf4109/13075_2019_1837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/8a379a566bbb/13075_2019_1837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ba/6381622/97773af13400/13075_2019_1837_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life in patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.在一项 3 期随机对照试验中,采用托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎患者的健康相关生活质量。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Feb 20;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1837-7.
2
Glucocorticoid Dosages and Acute-Phase Reactant Levels at Giant Cell Arteritis Flare in a Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab.托珠单抗随机临床试验中巨细胞动脉炎发作时的糖皮质激素剂量和急性期反应物水平。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;71(8):1329-1338. doi: 10.1002/art.40876. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
3
Treatment failure in giant cell arteritis.巨细胞动脉炎的治疗失败。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov;80(11):1467-1474. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220347. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
New-onset versus relapsing giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab: 3-year results from a randomized controlled trial and extension.新发病与复发巨细胞动脉炎应用托珠单抗治疗:一项随机对照试验和扩展研究的 3 年结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Jul 6;61(7):2915-2922. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab780.
5
Tocilizumab vs placebo for the treatment of giant cell arteritis with polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms, cranial symptoms or both in a randomized trial.托珠单抗与安慰剂治疗巨细胞动脉炎伴多肌痛风湿症症状、颅部症状或两者均有的随机试验。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Apr;51(2):469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
6
Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.
7
Intravenous tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis: a phase Ib dose-ranging pharmacokinetic bridging study.静脉注射托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎:一项 Ib 期剂量范围药代动力学桥接研究。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 4;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02815-9.
8
Impact of tocilizumab monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from two randomised controlled trials.托珠单抗单药治疗对两项随机对照试验中类风湿关节炎患者报告结局的影响。
RMD Open. 2017 Sep 14;3(2):e000496. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000496. eCollection 2017.
9
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III study of shortening the dosing interval of subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to subcutaneous tocilizumab every other week: Results of the 12-week double-blind period.一项关于缩短类风湿关节炎患者皮下注射托珠单抗单药治疗给药间隔时间的随机、双盲、平行组III期研究,这些患者对每两周一次的皮下注射托珠单抗反应不足:12周双盲期结果
Mod Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;28(1):76-84. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2017.1332507. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
The impact of treatment with avacopan on health-related quality of life in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial.阿伐考潘治疗抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎对健康相关生活质量的影响:来自 ADVOCATE 试验的数据的事后分析。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Aug;5(8):e451-e460. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00092-9. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Illness Burden and Unmet Patient Needs in Giant Cell Arteritis: Current State and Future Prospects.巨细胞动脉炎的疾病负担与未满足的患者需求:现状与未来展望
Open Access Rheumatol. 2025 Jul 1;17:117-134. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S517664. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Biological Agents in Giant Cell Arteritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis.生物制剂治疗巨细胞动脉炎的疗效与安全性:一项更新的荟萃分析
Avicenna J Med. 2025 Jun 19;15(2):64-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809621. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Efficacy of pharmacological interventions: a systematic review informing the 2023 EULAR recommendations for the management of fatigue in people with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroendocrine and neurophysiological effects of interleukin 6 in rheumatoid arthritis.白细胞介素 6 在类风湿关节炎中的神经内分泌和神经生理学作用。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Nov 1;57(11):1885-1895. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex391.
2
What is the impact of giant cell arteritis on patients' lives? A UK qualitative study.巨细胞动脉炎对患者生活有何影响?一项英国的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 23;7(8):e017073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017073.
3
Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎的临床试验。
药物干预的疗效:一项系统评价,为 2023 年 EULAR 炎症性风湿和肌肉骨骼疾病患者疲劳管理建议提供信息。
RMD Open. 2023 Dec 6;9(4):e003349. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003349.
4
Evidence on treat to target strategies in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review.关于肌痛性风湿症和巨细胞动脉炎的靶向治疗策略的证据:系统文献回顾。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Feb 1;63(2):285-297. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead471.
5
A systematic literature review informing the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment with interleukin-6 pathway inhibition with biological DMARDs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.一项系统文献综述,为免疫介导的炎症性疾病中生物 DMARD 类白细胞介素-6 通路抑制药物的疗效和安全性共识声明提供信息。
RMD Open. 2022 Sep;8(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002359.
6
Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA).巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的治疗
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 24;11(7):1799. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071799.
7
Blocking GM-CSF receptor α with mavrilimumab reduces infiltrating cells, pro-inflammatory markers and neoangiogenesis in ex vivo cultured arteries from patients with giant cell arteritis.用马伏鲁单抗阻断 GM-CSF 受体 α 可减少巨细胞动脉炎患者离体培养动脉中的浸润细胞、促炎标志物和新生血管形成。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Apr;81(4):524-536. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220873. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
Large-vessel vasculitis.大血管血管炎
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Jan 6;7(1):93. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00327-5.
9
Tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 22;8(8):CD013484. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013484.pub2.
10
Treatment failure in giant cell arteritis.巨细胞动脉炎的治疗失败。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov;80(11):1467-1474. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220347. Epub 2021 May 28.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.
4
Contemporary prevalence estimates for giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica, 2015.2015 年巨细胞动脉炎和风湿性多肌痛的当代流行率估计。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):253-256. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
Quality of life of patients treated for giant cell arteritis: a case-control study.巨细胞动脉炎治疗患者的生活质量:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;36(9):2055-2062. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3619-4. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Newly diagnosed vs. relapsing giant cell arteritis: Baseline data from the GiACTA trial.新诊断与复发的巨细胞动脉炎:来自GiACTA试验的基线数据。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Apr;46(5):657-664. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
The prevalence of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica in a UK primary care population.英国基层医疗人群中巨细胞动脉炎和风湿性多肌痛的患病率。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 15;17:285. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1127-3.
8
Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival of Biopsy-Proven Giant Cell Arteritis in Northern Italy During a 26-Year Period.意大利北部26年间经活检证实的巨细胞动脉炎的发病率、患病率及生存率
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Mar;69(3):430-438. doi: 10.1002/acr.22942.
9
Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: an update.巨细胞动脉炎和风湿性多肌痛:最新进展。
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):6. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0480-1.
10
Epidemiological study of primary systemic vasculitides among adults in southern Spain and review of the main epidemiological studies.西班牙南部成年人原发性系统性血管炎的流行病学研究及主要流行病学研究综述
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;33(2 Suppl 89):S-11-8. Epub 2014 Nov 7.