Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗与安慰剂治疗巨细胞动脉炎伴多肌痛风湿症症状、颅部症状或两者均有的随机试验。

Tocilizumab vs placebo for the treatment of giant cell arteritis with polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms, cranial symptoms or both in a randomized trial.

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Apr;51(2):469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled GiACTA trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). The present study evaluated the efficacy of TCZ in patients with GCA presenting with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms only, cranial symptoms only or both PMR and cranial symptoms in the GiACTA trial.

METHODS

In GiACTA, 250 patients with GCA received either TCZ weekly or every other week plus a 26-week prednisone taper or PBO plus a 26- or 52-week prednisone taper. This post hoc analysis assessed baseline characteristics, sustained remission rate, number of flares, annualized flare rate, time to flare, cumulative prednisone dose, methotrexate use and safety in patients with PMR symptoms only, cranial symptoms only or both at baseline.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 patients had PMR symptoms only, 94 had cranial symptoms only and 104 had both symptoms at baseline. At Week 52, rates of sustained remission were significantly higher with TCZ vs PBO in all 3 groups (PMR only, 45.2% vs 19.0%, P = 0.0446; cranial only, 60.3% vs 19.4%, P = 0.0001; PMR and cranial, 55.0% vs 11.4%, P < 0.0001). Smaller proportions of TCZ-treated patients experienced disease flare than PBO-treated patients across all groups (PMR only, 41.9% vs 57.1%; cranial only, 20.7% vs 47.2%; PMR and cranial, 31.7% vs 81.8%). Annualized flare rate and risk of flare were significantly lower with TCZ vs PBO for patients with cranial symptoms only and both symptoms; they were numerically lower, but did not reach statistical significance, in the smaller group of patients with PMR symptoms only.

CONCLUSIONS

TCZ improved clinical outcomes in patients who presented with PMR symptoms only, cranial symptoms only or both at baseline, suggesting that TCZ is effective in patients with GCA regardless of the presenting clinical phenotype.

摘要

目的

随机、安慰剂(PBO)对照的 GiACTA 试验表明,托珠单抗(TCZ)治疗巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者的疗效和安全性。本研究评估了 TCZ 在 GiACTA 试验中仅表现为多发性肌痛(PMR)症状、仅颅症状或同时具有 PMR 和颅症状的 GCA 患者中的疗效。

方法

在 GiACTA 中,250 名 GCA 患者接受 TCZ 每周或每两周一次加 26 周泼尼松减量或 PBO 加 26 或 52 周泼尼松减量。本事后分析评估了基线特征、持续缓解率、发作次数、年化发作率、发作时间、累积泼尼松剂量、甲氨蝶呤使用和安全性在仅 PMR 症状、仅颅症状或基线时同时具有这两种症状的患者中。

结果

总体而言,52 名患者仅表现为 PMR 症状,94 名患者仅表现为颅症状,104 名患者同时具有这两种症状。在第 52 周时,TCZ 组的持续缓解率明显高于 PBO 组,在所有 3 组中(仅 PMR,45.2% vs. 19.0%,P=0.0446;仅颅,60.3% vs. 19.4%,P=0.0001;PMR 和颅,55.0% vs. 11.4%,P<0.0001)。在所有组中,接受 TCZ 治疗的患者发生疾病发作的比例均低于接受 PBO 治疗的患者(仅 PMR,41.9% vs. 57.1%;仅颅,20.7% vs. 47.2%;PMR 和颅,31.7% vs. 81.8%)。对于仅颅症状或同时具有这两种症状的患者,TCZ 组的年化发作率和发作风险明显低于 PBO 组,在仅 PMR 症状患者中,这两个指标虽有所降低,但未达到统计学意义。

结论

TCZ 改善了基线时仅表现为 PMR 症状、仅颅症状或同时具有这两种症状的患者的临床结局,表明 TCZ 对具有 GCA 的患者有效,无论其临床表现型如何。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验